Jump to content

The Benitez Thread


CHOULO19
 Share

  

274 members have voted

  1. 1. Rafa Out?



Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Rafa Benitez is a completely cunt, it is so obvious he couldnt gain respect of our players.

I dont think anyone can judge whoever supported him, things might have turned out alrgiht and we really werent so good under RDM, but the members who did indeed supported him need to apologize and recognise their mistake. Same with the members who thought Corinthians was a pub team or some team that would get relegated.

I am one of those who believed in Benitez, but I was terriblely wrong. I am sorry!

GTFO FSW, NOW!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

any nincompoop. infact does it matter. any1 would be better. let JT be the player-manager.

Never, roman doesn't care about a person and what they represent to this football club. Making JT manager would eventually result in roman sacking JT and i hated him sacking RDM, so i don't think i could take that happenning to JT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never, roman doesn't care about a person and what they represent to this football club. Making JT manager would eventually result in roman sacking JT and i hated him sacking RDM, so i don't think i could take that happenning to JT.

no need to "sack" JT. just make him the manager till the end of season, then get the big one. plus it was just one case study.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bollocks.

give me any instance showing otherwise. an instance which shows roman has respected "chelsea" the club and its players (past and present) which was and is. roman's decisions might be good for a club, but those decisions would have been good for any club any where in the club. but for "chelsea" he definitely gives shit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

give me any instance showing otherwise. an instance which shows roman has respected "chelsea" the club and its players (past and present) which was and is. roman's decisions might be good for a club, but those decisions would have been good for any club any where in the club. but for "chelsea" he definitely gives shit.

The first player he tried to sign.

The hiring of Di Matteo as assistant.

His relationship with Bobby Campbell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chill down fellas, look at his loss from a bright side. We don't wanna be stuck with Rafa doing good and Mourinho and Guardiola both available in the summer...
If Benitez keeps doing badly, he will be sacked and we will pursue one of the two mentioned above with all our might, and when Romans wants something, Romans gets it.

Really retarded we lost today...idiotic. Blame falls on everyone, but a big part goes on Rafa. I dunno what is he like behind the scenes and how he interacts with players, but from what I've seen, he couldn't lift them up today and even Frank was on the pitch...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first player he tried to sign.

The hiring of Di Matteo as assistant.

His relationship with Bobby Campbell.

dude seriously, 3 instances? OUT OF ONE IS SELF DESTRUCTIVE. btw how does jurgen take a part in this or who are u talking about. because as far i remember jurgen macho was the first buy of roman era but definitely dont remember the 1st player he "tried" to sign.

anyways do actually believe what u r arguing for? do u think roman sees torres as nothin other than a 50mil investment out of which he wants to get something, otherwise i cant fathom a reason y any club in this world let alone the european champions with the desire to win the CL and PL again would have that blonde as their only striker for atleast half a season. and this is just one thing. i dont even wanna go into the rdm sacking, letting DD go, jose leaving the club because of ego clash with him etc.

i dont see anythin wrong in the statement "hutcho_cfc" had written.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dude seriously, 3 instances? OUT OF ONE IS SELF DESTRUCTIVE. btw how does jurgen take a part in this or who are u talking about. because as far i remember jurgen macho was the first buy of roman era but definitely dont remember the 1st player he "tried" to sign.

anyways do actually believe what u r arguing for? do u think roman sees torres as nothin other than a 50mil investment out of which he wants to get something, otherwise i cant fathom a reason y any club in this world let alone the european champions with the desire to win the CL and PL again would have that blonde as their only striker for atleast half a season. and this is just one thing. i dont even wanna go into the rdm sacking, letting DD go, jose leaving the club because of ego clash with him etc.

i dont see anythin wrong in the statement "hutcho_cfc" had written.

To be fair, you only asked for one instance.

The first player Roman tried to buy was Zola. I believe he cares about the club and it's history, as well as it's future. In fact I know he does.

Torres is a £50 million investment. It's hard to just right that type of asset off without trying everything, and letting DD go was the right decision all round in my opinion. He's a Chelsea legend who went out in the best way possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When is he going to cut this 'positives' crap from his post-match press conferences?

''Against a good team we had four clear chances, you don't normally see that many in a final, so that means a lot.

'For some players coming back, like Frank Lampard, it will be an improvement on his match fitness. For others, it will be a good experience; they will know what it's like to play against a strong South American team and to play in another continent with a different atmosphere.''

wow four chances. I'd be expecting at least that with Mata, Hazard and Oscar in midfield. Lampard gaining match fitness and playing in a different atmosphere- if that isn't clutching at straws for positives I don't know what is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, you only asked for one instance.

The first player Roman tried to buy was Zola. I believe he cares about the club and it's history, as well as it's future. In fact I know he does.

Torres is a £50 million investment. It's hard to just right that type of asset off without trying everything, and letting DD go was the right decision all round in my opinion. He's a Chelsea legend who went out in the best way possible.

dude dont troll me, we let zola go out as a "free agent" in the same summer roman came in. infact zola went from chelsea on 2 july 2003 to be absolutely precise, so u r absolutely wrong about it unless i have lost my mind completely and dont remember a thing. anyways u right about him caring for the club's future(short term to be precise) but not about its past. and we were not ready for life without DD and its showing. if roman had not been so hell bent on torres he would have given dd a contract for the club's benefit and god knows DD had deserved it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You