Jump to content

Eden Hazard


the wes
 Share

Recommended Posts

Lukaku on Hazard...

http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11668/7788006/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

He will become the fourth Belgian to join Chelsea since last summer and Lukaku added: "I am glad he comes to Chelsea. He will make us stronger.

"I was hoping for this transfer for a long time. I told him, that if he needs anything I will be there for him.

"Maybe in the future all Belgians can play in the Chelsea team: Thibaut Courtois, Kevin De Bruyne, Hazard and me. That would be great."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't be silly. Why loan them to Premier League sides?

Vitesse in the Eredivisie is the TRUE way to measure a player's skill and help him grow to his unlimited potential!!!

Just look at Ulises Davila and van Aanholt!

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are people actually complaining about Hazard's price? Really? I can understand arguing about Hulk's inflated price but not Hazard. Look at Aguero's price. About £40 Million wasn't it? I bet people thought that was overpriced. We let him slip through our grasps because we weren't willing to pay a little extra. Than look what happened. He went and scored goals for fun and won Citeh the title. I'm pretty sure everyone would agree now that Aguero was worth every cent.

Hazard will prove his price tag as well. £32 is a good deal IMO. Hazard will be great this season. I expect him to have a great season like Aguero has. He'll become a fantasy type player that others would love to have.

32 million for the potential he has is a steal. Even going off his current ability, he's only .91 of an Andy Carroll and a 1.77 of a Stewart Downing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reports are coming in that he'll be on something around 175,000-200,000 a week. For a 21 year old to be on that kind of money, earning as much as Terry, Torres and Lampard do, he had better deliver.

No. No. No. The Belgian & French are reporting that he will be earning around 110K p/w only!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. No. No. The Belgian & French are reporting that he will be earning around 110K p/w only!

Oh. Well, I've seen 78 million bandied about, so that's 46 million (minus the 32 million transfer fee) over 5 years; 9.2 million a year and ~177,000 a week. That's how I arrived at my figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh. Well, I've seen 78 million bandied about, so that's 46 million (minus the 32 million transfer fee) over 5 years; 9.2 million a year and ~177,000 a week. That's how I arrived at my figure.

The club won't be so silly to offer a 21 y/o that amount of money. Best to trust the French or Belgian media in this case. The English media will do anything to make us look bad and as if the only reason Hazard coming to us is because of the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe even more? Isn't tax rate 0.5?

If so, Hazard is costing us >=15m a year.

Its BS... to be honest how would they actually now what we are paying him, sure neither he nor his agent have been telling every journalist they meet. Only last week the same journo's were reporting that both United, City and Chelsea has agreed personal terms with him.

Now he has choosen us its because we offered him more than the rest. BS reporting, wait till its in the Gaurdian then il believe it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its BS... to be honest how would they actually now what we are paying him, sure neither he nor his agent have been telling every journalist they meet. Only last week the same journo's were reporting that both United, City and Chelsea has agreed personal terms with him.

Now he has choosen us its because we offered him more than the rest. BS reporting, wait till its in the Gaurdian then il believe it.

I'm not suggesting anything, merely going by what L'Equipe (pretty reliable by most counts) are saying. A few pages back there was a link claiming Hazard had actually offered to reduce his wage to ~70k when we came knocking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's fine but he's not worth 32m. We signed Mata for 24m and Hazard is definitely not 8m better than him.

Thanks, but having watched copious amounts of Lille games just recently on the computer due to my French friend having all of this seasons games on his computer, I can comfortably say, yes, he is worth 32m, and yes, he is 8m better than Mata.

Get ready for a fun to watch season with this player. This guy absolutely dominates the game with his presence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You