chealsist 23 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 I think we need one player in attack like Cavani not Hulk we have enough middfielder right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael. 0 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 I would love Hulk, but Moses will be just fine, and won't be so hard on our budget. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blue_swaggin_96 96 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 i don't believe nothing RDm says, is upto roman and i think hulk is ours! not sure about rest of you but , i couldn't give flying fuck about how much the player cost as long his ours and we win trophies!this might sound like insult-both some of you need to work your financial situations before you worry about the clubs! were fine@@@@ tired of seeing all this scrubs with this coporate comments. really annoying especially in transfer threat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedsBlue 1,549 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Well if its between Hulk and Moses then I think we should go for the green monster instead.Moses is a very good player but his chances of him succeeding here will be very slim.Maybe this season he will get some few games because he will be our 3rd choice striker and right winger but what will happen next season?He will probably get the same number of chances as I can see Torres leaving and a world class striker coming with then the return of Lukaku and then there is Danny also.Obviously,I cant exactly know what may happen to our strike force next season but its clear that Moses won't go up the pecking order.So then why sign him at all and ruin his career.Signing Hulk on the other hand will make him an automatic starter and will give us the same luxury of having a striker and winger in one player.If Chelsea can offer a starting berth to Moses and give him the chances we intend on giving to Hulk then the Moses deal should be a real bargain but that's highly unlikely and so therefore maybe its best if we forget about other alternatives and just concentrate on getting Hulk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stats 7,142 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 I think we need one player in attack like Cavani not Hulk we have enough middfielder right nowHulk is not a midfielder, he is a inside forward/striker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TorontoChelsea 4,064 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Hulk is not a midfielder, he is a inside forward/strikerWhich makes signing him strange. Hulk is best as a 4-3-3 winger but we are going to play a 4-2-3-1 system so Hulk would be playing on the right of the 3 as an attacking midfielder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Would peope prefer Hulk or Moses and someone like Cavani? I know which I'd prefer... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stats 7,142 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Which makes signing him strange. Hulk is best as a 4-3-3 winger but we are going to play a 4-2-3-1 system so Hulk would be playing on the right of the 3 as an attacking midfielder.Yes pretty much I think but he will have a lot of freedom. Similar to how Robben is used at Bayern. Also a good striker as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouNameIt 1,511 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Would peope prefer Hulk or Moses and someone like Cavani? I know which I'd prefer...My problem with signing Cavani would be that Danny can forget playing as CF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nadavTKL 1,787 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Which makes signing him strange. Hulk is best as a 4-3-3 winger but we are going to play a 4-2-3-1 system so Hulk would be playing on the right of the 3 as an attacking midfielder.Hazard also played 4-3-3 at Lile. And C.Ronaldo is playing LW in Real's 4-2-3-1, and he's very similar to Hulk. Hulk and Hazard will need to contribute more defensivly but its definitely not strange to assume they could do this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,570 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Football Agent 007 @EPLAgent007I understand Porto and Chelsea have agreed an initial fee for Hulk; of around €40 million. Porto still negotiating small add-ons. #CFC #FCP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
francozola 2,040 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 I wish people would stop quoting shit from that Agent007 cunt. He posts absolute rubbish. And people say he's accurate sometimes... When you predict 100000 different events, chances are you'll get a couple right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blue_swaggin_96 96 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 i think the hulk is deal is done deal as fars papers go! hahaawe need hulk if we want to retain our european title! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Term-X 7,891 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Would peope prefer Hulk or Moses and someone like Cavani? I know which I'd prefer...Nuri Sahin.Heck.. I'd rather hijack Madrid's Modric deal than sign Cavani atm, the current double-pivot is giving me nightmares. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Nuri Sahin.Heck.. I'd rather hijack Madrid's Modric deal than sign Cavani atm, the current double-pivot is giving me nightmares.The trouble with our double pivot is defensive protection though. Not creativity. Would Modric really be the answer to that problem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,570 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 The trouble with our double pivot is defensive protection though. Not creativity. Would Modric really be the answer to that problem?O-S-C-A-R Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 The trouble with our double pivot is defensive protection though. Not creativity. Would Modric really be the answer to that problem?Not exclusively. What we don't have in the double pivot is an outlet, someone who connects play. It's mutually exclusive. Lampard should be the one linking play up due to him having the necessary skill set but due to his natural B2B tendencies he leaves Mikel exposed. Modric has the ability to make the right decision on when to join attack and when to sit deep to connect the team. A Mikel - Modric partnership in the pivot would be glorious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 ^^ I disagree. I would much rather a solid as a rock pair in our double pivots. That's what a 4-2-3-1 needs IMO. We have enough creativity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Term-X 7,891 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 O-S-C-A-RWe need someone deep lying to pull the strings though, Oscar from 'what we've gathered' would be wasted there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson 358 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 “@EPLAgent007: Hulk has today told his team mates he is leaving Porto for Chelsea. #CFC”Please be true!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts