Jump to content

Schurrle signing confirmed; will wear #14


 Share

Recommended Posts

this reports abouth im earning 4.8 million euros are false I think. dont think that we will give him such a high salary from the beginning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

this reports abouth im earning 4.8 million euros are false I think. dont think that we will give him such a high salary from the beginning.

Was reported so by Kicker apparently.

http://www.weaintgotnohistory.com/chelsea-fc-transfer-rumours-news/2013/6/13/4426038/andre-schurrle-chelsea-fc-personal-terms-rumor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

shitl. i hoped the deal was off, as reported in Germany. Fuck it. This means we won't sign Hulk or another, better winger.

Didn't take long. The guy has just signed and someone is bitching because we aren't going to sign a winger who is older, costs more and took his arse to Russia for a paycheque.

Personally I'm excited about signing someone with so much potential. Plenty have people shit on this guy and tore him to shreds because there was a chance we might loan out De Bruyne for a year. Now we've managed to keep two hot prospects at the club for another year and it's still not good enough??

Fuck me. :wank2::wank2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First we hear the nickname Mazacar and now we have...

Schumacar

Schumazard

Mazaurrle

Shumazani

Mazabryune

Eden DeSchumacar

:doh:

His name is Schürrle. "Schü" is pronounced completely different than "Schu". Phonetically an English "Shyrrlea" probably comes closest to Schürrle in German.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OR it's yet another typical case of the club being silly to overpay someone in the wages.

'Another' and 'typical'.....really??

The club over the last couple of years has been a model of restraint and financial prudence in almost all their dealings. This guy is making roughly what Cahill makes (reportedly) partly because he's a good young player but also because that's the financial model at clubs nowadays. He's making less than Benayoun did, less than Malouda did and less than Essien still does but he should contribute more. He's making roughly what Damien Duff was on at Newcastle and that's if the reports are even close to being true, and even if they are there's no mention of signing fees (were there any? were they waived to increase his weekly take home?) and no mention of how the wages are made up (does he have any claim to his image rights and is this figure made up of bonuses).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't take long. The guy has just signed and someone is bitching because we aren't going to sign a winger who is older, costs more and took his arse to Russia for a paycheque.

Personally I'm excited about signing someone with so much potential. Plenty have people shit on this guy and tore him to shreds because there was a chance we might loan out De Bruyne for a year. Now we've managed to keep two hot prospects at the club for another year and it's still not good enough??

Fuck me. :wank2::wank2:

Later.

You can read my post on one of the first sides of his transfer thread. I was against signing him from the very beginning.Hulk would be better for us than Schürrle, cos he is better, faster, stronger, more experienced and does not on the same wing as hazard,w hich means one could easily plot the two of them in one team without changing one's position.

+We rather need an out and out winger more than a guy like Schürrle. So for me, either out and out winger or Hulk >>>> Schürrle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the Mata with You Turnbulling the thread now come Hazard can I give you pun Oscar to Cahill Sent from my iPhone using Genjutsu

What da f$$k did u read

Sent from my iPhone using Genjutsu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You