David Luiz

[bushman 2,043]

Hazard can be replaced by a player who is equally good for less than 50 million, Im not sayin his not good but 50 million is no laughing matter,

Wrong assessment, I feel.

Hazard is worth more than 50m now & his stock is rising.

Hazard has potential to be as good as Messi or Ronaldo in three or more years.

[Vybz Kartel 1,613]

Wrong assessment, I feel.

Hazard is worth more than 50m now & his stock is rising.

Hazard has potential to be as good as Messi or Ronaldo in three or more years.

The problem with us is we see 50 mill as nothin after Torres and Willian stupid transfer, but if one was to really use 50 million wisely they would get really really good players, take for example Liverpool bought Suarez for 22 million and Sturidge for 12 million tht is 16 million less than we paid for Torres who is arguably a worse player. im not sayin Hazard is not good enough but for 50 million I would sell him and use the funds to build an even better team

[Sidzeret 2,257]

Chelsea have agreed to sell David Luiz to Paris St Germain for a fee which could approach £40million, and may make the shaggy-haired Brazilian the most expensive defender in the world.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/chelsea/10851119/David-Luiz-to-move-to-Paris-Saint-Germain-after-Chelsea-agree-40million-fee.html

I was waiting for The Telegraph to report to actually believe it. Its bye bye, Luiz

[bushman 2,043]

The problem with us is we see 50 mill as nothin after Torres and Willian stupid transfer, but if one was to really use 50 million wisely they would get really really good players, take for example Liverpool bought Suarez for 22 million and Sturidge for 12 million tht is 16 million less than we paid for Torres who is arguably a worse player. im not sayin Hazard is not good enough but for 50 million I would sell him and use the funds to build an even better team

Sorry pal, but I honestly do not wish to go round & round here. You have your opinion & I have mine.

Hazard is very close to 50m right now & counting.

Willian was worth to buy, in my view. Torres was, is a flop for 50m. There is no need to compare Torres to anyone, it´s useless.

Also, thank God you have nothing to do with Chelsea´s transfers.

[The Skipper 20,593]

Di Maria, Sanchez, Gotze, Mata, Griezmann, Robben just to name a few players who would be below the 50 million range and would give eqaully the same output as Hazard

Robben would be an awful signing simply because he's ageing now.

Griezmann and Sanchez are not in Hazard's class.

Mata and Gotze are predominantly number 10s.

Real don't need to sell Di Maria and Hazard is better than him out wide anyway.

Selling Hazard and replacing him for any of these would be a downgrade.

[Vybz Kartel 1,613]

Sorry pal, but I honestly do not wish to go round & round here. You have your opinion & I have mine.

Hazard is very close to 50m right now & counting.

Willian was worth to buy, in my view. Torres was, is a flop for 50m. There is no need to compare Torres to anyone, it´s useless.

Also, thank God you have nothing to do with Chelsea´s transfers.

If I did I would definatly not hv wasted 50 million on a guy who was clearly injured, I would not have spent 7 million on Demba Ba instead would hv given a chance to my young striker sturridge, I would also not have spent 32 million on willian when I needed to spend on a that money on a striker a position which was of a more prior concern,

[bushman 2,043]

If I did I would definatly not hv wasted 50 million on a guy who was clearly injured, I would not have spent 7 million on Demba Ba instead would hv given a chance to my young striker sturridge, I would also not have spent 32 million on willian when I needed to spend on a that money on a striker a position which was of a more prior concern,

As I said, thank God you have nothing to do with it.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

I was excited about the 50m till I saw the source was Neil Ashton...

Jason Cundy just retweeted Ashton's article and he NEVER does that. Perhaps this could be a major sign that it's happening. Maybe the Mail's price is wrong, but anything from 30 million pounds up and it's a fantastic deal.

How would Cundy know anything about Chelsea transfers?

[bushman 2,043]

I believe, the price will be around 40m. Going once, twice, sold.

[yuvala 2,167]

40M for Luiz ?

That's really A LOT for him.

[Viper22 2,418]

If I did I would definatly not hv wasted 50 million on a guy who was clearly injured, I would not have spent 7 million on Demba Ba instead would hv given a chance to my young striker sturridge, I would also not have spent 32 million on willian when I needed to spend on a that money on a striker a position which was of a more prior concern,

Hindsight makes everyone a genius eh? The fact that you think Griezzman, Robben or Sanchez are as good as Hazard suggests that you would have made many MANY more mistakes than have been made at this club. "We need a striker! Quick, sign Soldado!"

[Viper22 2,418]

I was excited about the 50m till I saw the source was Neil Ashton...

How would Cundy know anything about Chelsea transfers?

We all get excited then you come and shoot everything down with stuff like 'logic' and 'intuition'. Damn you .

[Thendo 1,088]

To good to be true. If we can get 30m for him that would be great.

[The only place to be 11,313]

The problem with us is we see 50 mill as nothin after Torres and Willian stupid transfer, but if one was to really use 50 million wisely they would get really really good players, take for example Liverpool bought Suarez for 22 million and Sturidge for 12 million tht is 16 million less than we paid for Torres who is arguably a worse player. im not sayin Hazard is not good enough but for 50 million I would sell him and use the funds to build an even better team

You don't sell Hazards unless you have to. They're not players who are abundant. He's a potential ballon d'or and the truth is that any club looking to buy him right now would have to start at the world record transfer fee and maybe go up to €100 million.

[edetarod 2,155]

ah, it's the time of the ridiculous transfer rumors again

remember when we signed Cavani last year, it was official they said

[Hutcho 8,443]

Wow anything over 40 is a snap call as much as I like the guy.

[zolayes 14,489]

I know it was in the Sun but if PSG pay 50 million then the deal must be done.

[bushman 2,043]

Close around 40m dear old chaps.