Jump to content

🇧🇷 David Luiz


the wes
 Share

Recommended Posts

I hope Lampard stays and I think he's needed at the club right now with Cole almost certainly gone and Cech possibly having a smaller role. Van Ginkel's absence was weirdly unnoticed by most people outside the club, but he could be a real surprise next season.

I think Ramires hangs around because he has a unique skillset. Chalobah has a chance to impress in the summer and I'm hoping he does enough - I'd give him the number 4 shirt right now actually.

I think we'll sign someone else but it won't be a Kroos or Rakitic or Fabregas. Be interesting to see what happens with Pasalic as well. Could go to the World Cup, could get a few weeks training here, could be loaned out. Wouldn't put it past Jose to surprise people and include someone a bit younger next season.

From what i've heard, Pasalic is likely to be loaned to an Italian or German club

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luiz gets a lot of slack, but I think the main problem is the way we play.

Just like any other player, Luiz will fit some formations and tactics better than others. If we look at his perfomances from midfield against top clubs it can be seen that he is at his best when he has a more creative role and the team has more space to run into which he can exploit.

If he played in a team that revolved around possession, and where he is allowed more creative freedom from his deep defensive position, I think he would truly shine and justify a hefty price tag.

Cahill has benefited from the way Mou wants the defence to play as it hides his weaknesses, while it is the other way around for Luiz.

This is the thing about Luiz and arguments that support him - people meander from talking about him as a midfielder and defender too easily. You talk about the way we defend not suiting him but then talk up his performances as a midfielder. When you talk about his 'deep defensive position' do you mean CB or DM?

Are PSG buying a defender or midfielder here?

I think you're right that our system does require defenders to do the basics consistently and that is a problem for Luiz. He'll shine for PSG because the French league is far weaker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hazard can be replaced by a player who is equally good for less than 50 million, Im not sayin his not good but 50 million is no laughing matter,

Please name these players? And don't say Reus because we all know if Reus didn't have that supposed release clause in his contract he'd be going for well over £50m too.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I meant was that his perfomances against top teams as a midfielder allows him to show of his strengths better than his job in defence has. If he played as a CB in a possession-based team he would be able to act more like a CB-DM hybrid (Think Martinez in the german cup final) and would be allowed more of the freedom that makes him a worthwhile player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please name these players? And don't say Reus because we all know if Reus didn't have that supposed release clause in his contract he'd be going for well over £50m too.

Di Maria, Sanchez, Gotze, Mata, Griezmann, Robben just to name a few players who would be below the 50 million range and would give eqaully the same output as Hazard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hazard can be replaced by a player who is equally good for less than 50 million, Im not sayin his not good but 50 million is no laughing matter,

Wrong assessment, I feel.

Hazard is worth more than 50m now & his stock is rising.

Hazard has potential to be as good as Messi or Ronaldo in three or more years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrong assessment, I feel.

Hazard is worth more than 50m now & his stock is rising.

Hazard has potential to be as good as Messi or Ronaldo in three or more years.

The problem with us is we see 50 mill as nothin after Torres and Willian stupid transfer, but if one was to really use 50 million wisely they would get really really good players, take for example Liverpool bought Suarez for 22 million and Sturidge for 12 million tht is 16 million less than we paid for Torres who is arguably a worse player. im not sayin Hazard is not good enough but for 50 million I would sell him and use the funds to build an even better team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chelsea have agreed to sell David Luiz to Paris St Germain for a fee which could approach £40million, and may make the shaggy-haired Brazilian the most expensive defender in the world.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/chelsea/10851119/David-Luiz-to-move-to-Paris-Saint-Germain-after-Chelsea-agree-40million-fee.html

I was waiting for The Telegraph to report to actually believe it. Its bye bye, Luiz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with us is we see 50 mill as nothin after Torres and Willian stupid transfer, but if one was to really use 50 million wisely they would get really really good players, take for example Liverpool bought Suarez for 22 million and Sturidge for 12 million tht is 16 million less than we paid for Torres who is arguably a worse player. im not sayin Hazard is not good enough but for 50 million I would sell him and use the funds to build an even better team

Sorry pal, but I honestly do not wish to go round & round here. You have your opinion & I have mine.

Hazard is very close to 50m right now & counting.

Willian was worth to buy, in my view. Torres was, is a flop for 50m. There is no need to compare Torres to anyone, it´s useless.

Also, thank God you have nothing to do with Chelsea´s transfers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Di Maria, Sanchez, Gotze, Mata, Griezmann, Robben just to name a few players who would be below the 50 million range and would give eqaully the same output as Hazard

Robben would be an awful signing simply because he's ageing now.

Griezmann and Sanchez are not in Hazard's class.

Mata and Gotze are predominantly number 10s.

Real don't need to sell Di Maria and Hazard is better than him out wide anyway.

Selling Hazard and replacing him for any of these would be a downgrade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry pal, but I honestly do not wish to go round & round here. You have your opinion & I have mine.

Hazard is very close to 50m right now & counting.

Willian was worth to buy, in my view. Torres was, is a flop for 50m. There is no need to compare Torres to anyone, it´s useless.

Also, thank God you have nothing to do with Chelsea´s transfers.

If I did I would definatly not hv wasted 50 million on a guy who was clearly injured, I would not have spent 7 million on Demba Ba instead would hv given a chance to my young striker sturridge, I would also not have spent 32 million on willian when I needed to spend on a that money on a striker a position which was of a more prior concern,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...