Politics & Stuff

[YorkshireBlue 3,264]

29 minutes ago, cosmicway said:

This was your stupid question:

Simple question, would you let an unvetted male migrant into your house with your wife and kids so they had some where to stay? I have no problem with immigration, aslong as your legal and we know who you are and what you can offer, easy to let people in, but where do you put them once they are here.

So how do I know who is vetted and who is n't and is it my function ?
How do I also know which ones among my fellow countrymen are pickpockets and who are n't ?

Then do people normally invite various fellow countrymen, non-relatives, to ... stay at their house ?
I do have a small flat in my country house available for aibnb but I suppose you don't mean that.
Yet again one summer there were a couple of fishermen -Greeks- accomodated and come October they did n't want to go and I had to lock the house and leave !

All that stuff is misleading.
But, from among the racists, I have n't seen anyone who is kind to foreign doctors (vetted), black nurses (also vetted), other workers (vetted too).
Their daily job is to spread hatred, like with Vinicious Junior and the Valencia fans.

Your question is a Jew baiting question but also defies logic.
I 'm supposed to be nasty with ... unvetted people (for criminal activities, communism) but as I don't know them I am asked to spread hatred.

Funny that apparently the "stupid questions" is one you cannot answer. Who said your supposed to be nasty infact wtf are you even talking about, I asked if you would take in an unvetted male migrant into your house, where your wife and kids are, so he had some where to stay. It's really simple watch professor woke. The answer is NO would I fuck, not because he's foreign, not because of the colour of his skin, not because he can't speak English, because I dunno who the hell he his or what he's done, just like I wouldn't take in a random English man. But you some.how seem to think looking out for your own family and not letting these guys come live at your house is Jew bating and spreading hate, wtf are you on.

[cosmicway 1,333]

29 minutes ago, YorkshireBlue said:

Funny that apparently the "stupid questions" is one you cannot answer. Who said your supposed to be nasty infact wtf are you even talking about, I asked if you would take in an unvetted male migrant into your house, where your wife and kids are, so he had some where to stay. It's really simple watch professor woke. The answer is NO would I fuck, not because he's foreign, not because of the colour of his skin, not because he can't speak English, because I dunno who the hell he his or what he's done, just like I wouldn't take in a random English man. But you some.how seem to think looking out for your own family and not letting these guys come live at your house is Jew bating and spreading hate, wtf are you on.

Let's starts from basics.
Foreigners can be of the following varieties

(1) Hostiles, Al-Qaedda for example
(2) Common law criminals. The poor and the jobless are always suspect of course.
(3) Friendly guys.

Once upon a time a man from the second bureau in the army asked me this question: Where would a foreign spy reside ? In the posh neighbourhoods or in the working class districts ? Having doctor Sorge in mind I answered "posh neighbourhoods - Kolonaki". He says "wrong, he will go and live in the west side of town with the gypsies - that way he has a chance to stay unnoticed". As I was a private and he was a colonel I must believe, but I still entertain my doubts. How will you manage to steal Whitehall secrets from a gypsie neighbourhood ? You must -like doctor Sorge- move among the high society in Tokyo Japan.

However the (3) are obviously the big majority - or we would have one bomb in every block of houses.
So, in effect, one is simply spreading hatred by talking against the immigrants - or he is hiding his real agenda.
 

[YorkshireBlue 3,264]

2 minutes ago, cosmicway said:

Let's starts from basics.
Foreigners can be of the following varieties

(1) Hostiles, Al-Qaedda for example
(2) Common law criminals. The poor and the jobless are always suspect of course.
(3) Friendly guys.

Once upon a time a man from the second bureau in the army asked me this question: Where would a foreign spy reside ? In the posh neighbourhoods or in the working class districts ? Having doctor Sorge in mind I answered "posh neighbourhoods - Kolonaki". He says "wrong, he will go and live in the west side of town with the gypsies - that way he has a chance to stay unnoticed". As I was a private and he was a colonel I must believe, but I still entertain my doubts. How will you manage to steal Whitehall secrets from a gypsie neighbourhood ? You must -like doctor Sorge- move among the high society in Tokyo Japan.

However the (3) are obviously the big majority - or we would have one bomb in every block of houses.
So, in effect, one is simply spreading hatred by talking against the immigrants - or he is hiding his real agenda.
 

I'll just wait until you can type yes or no, rather than some nonsense like that 👍

[cosmicway 1,333]

15 minutes ago, YorkshireBlue said:

I'll just wait until you can type yes or no, rather than some nonsense like that 👍

It's a Jew baiting question.

[lucio 5,418]

13 minutes ago, cosmicway said:

It's a Jew baiting question.

The fuck does his question have to do with Jews ?

[cosmicway 1,333]

9 minutes ago, lucio said:

The fuck does his question have to do with Jews ?

That's what it is - low caliber intellect.

[lucio 5,418]

2 minutes ago, cosmicway said:

That's what it is - low caliber intellect.

It's just basic logic and common sense. Better than your unrelated mental gymnastics 

[YorkshireBlue 3,264]

9 minutes ago, lucio said:

It's just basic logic and common sense. Better than your unrelated mental gymnastics 

He can't answer the question, because he knows the answer is no, but if he says no he can't continue banging on about the subject. 

[cosmicway 1,333]

3 minutes ago, lucio said:

It's just basic logic and common sense. Better than your unrelated mental gymnastics 

 

4 minutes ago, YorkshireBlue said:

He can't answer the question, because he knows the answer is no, but if he says no he can't continue banging on about the subject. 

As I don't invite anybody to stay as a guest -bar exceptional circumstances- let's make the answer no.
Also I 'm not part of any governmentel charities, party political charity schemes.
The question is a shameful Jew baiting question.
Our issue here is equality, freedom from harrassment and discrimination of people who are innocent.
So the Jew baiters are seeking avenues to justify their horrible prejudices.
 

[lucio 5,418]

2 minutes ago, cosmicway said:

 

As I don't invite anybody to stay as a guest -bar exceptional circumstances- let's make the answer no.
Also I 'm not part of any governmentel charities, party political charity schemes.
The question is a shameful Jew baiting question.
Our issue here is equality, freedom from harrassment and discrimination of people who are innocent.
So the Jew baiters are seeking avenues to justify their horrible prejudices.
 

Lay off the petrol

[YorkshireBlue 3,264]

15 minutes ago, lucio said:

Our issue here is equality, freedom from harrassment and discrimination of people who are innocent.

But you wouldn't house one. So your happy for them to open the floodgates and allow every one in, just as long as you don't have to help house them. Happy to promote, but not happy to help. Gotcha 

[cosmicway 1,333]

7 minutes ago, YorkshireBlue said:

But you wouldn't house one. So your happy for them to open the floodgates and allow every one in, just as long as you don't have to help house them. Happy to promote, but not happy to help. Gotcha 

I answered the ridiculous Jew baiting question.
I never talkled about for "help" -other than what the state entitles one to.
You brought this one up by way of Jew baiting.
The issue is e-q-u-a-l-i-t-y and the victims of harrassment by racist fanatics include people with 25 British passports, as we all know.