Jump to content

Spike
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Sir Mikel OBE said:

And then it depends on how your businesses operate.

AI does make jobs easier, but that does not mean it frees the same workers to other things. It simply means we get rid of plenty of workers and place the remaining "less workload" on fewer and fewer people. That becomes the true cost of AI.

I can agree with that. 

However, I am not sure when, or if ever, organizations will be comfortable feeding confidential data through these AI bots, which could be exposed to both the reviewers of the AI or fed back and be prompted by other eyes. Not unless you're a big enough organization like Microsoft and can create your own AI/Data warehouse platform. 

Just increases exposure of data breaches. 

Edited by MoroccanBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Sir Mikel OBE said:

We won't judge AI readiness on being perfect though. We judge it how we judge the rest of business. Can it be good enough for an MBA to show as a cost saving metric?

I think commercial driving is more safe than something like copywriting or web development because a truck going wrong on the road can still lead to immediate death. White collar work in general is infinitely in more danger at the current moment.

yes, but commercial driving will be the first hit by "some automation" as in, "drivers" will become "monitors" rather than professional drivers. As in, their driving skill far less important than before. Likely not a great change as for wages and opportunity.

This will all be a slow transition. I don't think anything is imminent--well depends how you define imminent, but I expect decades, not years for real change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe in AI.
But it has to be pre-programmed for every task. How else is it going to work ?
Suppose we are the German high command in 1944 and we want to know where the allies will land.
To do this using AI first we have to feed it with data:
The coastlines of France, the defenses, the strength of the Luftwaffe and the concentrations of allied troops in England - if we can.
Then what sort of algorithm will AI use, to produce better results than those of Runsted-Rommel and anticipate the invasion ?
In retrospect it looks like the solution was to move the division "das reich" to the coast of Normandy in time and not after the event which is what the Germans did.
But we say this with the post-posterior information we have so it does n't count.
Will AI in a simulation solve this problem for the German high command ?

Edited by cosmicway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

HOOLIGANS - GREEK, CROATIAN AND OTHERS

Football hooliganism is an old thing.
Not as old as football itself but old enough.
In Greece they started life at around 1972. This is when for the first time moving masses of supporters were noticed, causing trouble.
Greece was still under the junta but that did n't play any role.
In the years to follow hooliganism took hold but in other countries it was already known from before. In England from the midsixties.
It is in a certain way the projection and the natural continuation of football fanaticism.
Before the hooligans the rage of football supporters was extinguished on the referees - or the bad referees if you like. We also had isolated incidents. Two rival supporters seating side by side - the one says some words and fighting ensues.
But things became a lot worse as we know.
It is not a small matter for someone who enters strong arguments from time to time to move into a phase where he wakes up in the middle of the night, moves from suburb to suburb to burn the offices of the rival club.
Here some analysis is required.

Many talk about nazis or, depending on which club we are talking about, for maoists-anarchists.
Basically this does n't hold ground. The UK nazis for example were calling themselves the party of racism, colonialism, iron fist rule should they ever came to power. But they were not calling themselves the party of ... Leicester City, or the party of ... Luton town FC, or the party of ... Arsenal.
The two kinds of logic don't fit together.
It is true that nazi instructors are getting involved, to school the youngsters.
It is also true that a football hooligan may become a nazi of his own free will, since nazism and hooliganism are similar states of mind.
But it's not true that the nazis, anarchists etc created hooliganism.

It's a football phenomenon and -unfortunately- the teams themselves have created it.
They have collected all the low life elements of society and made them into supporter clubs.
Could they have chosen doctors-lawyers-scientists to do that ? Rather not, they could n't so they engaged the low life elements.
This is the truth.
There is nothing else besides.
So therefere if for every 100 fanatical supporters we have 15 hooligans, it's enough to cause a big problem.

Is there a cure ?
There is and it is called Margaret Thatcher.
Margaret Thatcher was a politician who was disliked by many but what she did, to practically eliminate hooliganism from the UK was an achievement.
How can it be done ?
Five years out of Europe, 4-5 relegations plus the penalties imposed on the individuals who are arrested.
But are we going to see this ? Or perhaps we won't ?

Edited by cosmicway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, cosmicway said:

HOOLIGANS - GREEK, CROATIAN AND OTHERS

Football hooliganism is an old thing.
Not as old as football itsekf but old enough.
In Greece they started life at around 1972. This is when for the first time moving masses of supporters were noticed, causing trouble.
Greece was still under the junta but that did n't play any role.
In the years to follow hooliganism took hold but in other countries it was already known from before. In England from the midsixties.
It is in a ceratin way the projection and the natural continuation of football fanaticism.
Before the hooligans the rage of football supporters was extinguished on the referees - or the bad referees if you like. We also had isolated incidents. Two rival supporters seating side by side - the one says some words and fighting ensues.
But things became a lot worse as we know.
It is not a small matter for someone who enters strong arguments from time to time to move into a phase where he wakes up in the middle of the night, moves from suburb to suburb to burn the offices of the rival club.
Here some analysis is required.

Many talk about nazis or, depending on which club we are talking about, for maoists-anarchists.
Basically this does n't hold ground. The UK nazis for example were calling themselves the party of racism, colonialism, iron fist rule should they ever came to power. But they were not calling themselves the party of ... Leicester City, or the party of ... Luton town FC, or the party of ... Arsenal.
The two kinds of logic don't fit together.
It is true that nazi instructors are getting involved, to school the youngsters.
It is also true that a football hooligan may become a nazi of his own free will, since nazism and hooliganism are similar states of mind.
But it's not true that the nazis, anarchists etc created hooliganism.

It's a football phenomenon and -unfortunately- the teams themselves have created it.
They have collected all the low life elements of society and made them into supporter clubs.
Could they have chosen doctors-lawyers-scientists to do that ? Rather not, they could n't so they engaged the low life elements.
This is the truth.
There is nothing else besides.
So therefere if for every 100 fanatical supporters we have 15 hooligans, it's enough to cause a big problem.

Is there a cure ?
There is and it is called Margaret Thatcher.
Margaret Thatcher was a politician who was disliked by many but what she did, to practically eliminate hooliganism from the UK was an achievement.
How can it be done ?
Five years out of Europe, 4-5 relegations plus the penalties imposed on the individuals who are arrested.
But are we going to see this ? Or perhaps we won't ?

Anything that has passion also has violence, unfortunately the two things come hand in hand and you will never eliminate it completely.

Edited by YorkshireBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, YorkshireBlue said:

Anything that has passion also has violence, unfortunately the two things come hand in hand and you will never eliminate it completely.

Dynamo - 5 yrs out of Europe
PAOK Salonika - 3d division

Will they try again ? Would you place a bet on it ?

Those are the recent events - if we talk about the past I may expand to more cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, cosmicway said:

Dynamo - 5 yrs out of Europe
PAOK Salonika - 3d division

Will they try again ? Would you place a bet on it ?

Those are the recent events - if we talk about the past I may expand to more cases.

It will always happen, most of these fights are pre arranged to start with, you only ever hear about them when they escalate onto city streets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, cosmicway said:

Could they have chosen doctors-lawyers-scientists to do that ? Rather not, they could n't so they engaged the low life elements.
This is the truth.
There is nothing else besides.

Well, easy if it's only that. Here in the east it's hard not to point that the "hooligan" groups are often pretty much drug cartels and other kind of organized crime, with football being just an addition to have a little fight from time to time, holding the clubs and sometimes cities hostage to their influence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Vegetable said:

Well, easy if it's only that. Here in the east it's hard not to point that the "hooligan" groups are often pretty much drug cartels and other kind of organized crime, with football being just an addition to have a little fight from time to time, holding the clubs and sometimes cities hostage to their influence.

They would disappear with the Thatcher method.
But the politicians don't dare to.
Here is a funny story for you.

In 2005 Olympiakos fans set fire to a stadium. The match never started and Olympiakos had points deducted.
But they wanted the sentence to be repealed.
That was January 2005 and some weeks later -after the deduction of the points- I 'm invited by some crowd to attend a certain function in an orphanage in Piraeus.
It was for the new year and in Greece we have belated new year celebrations for up to February.
The folks who invited me was a local club of race goers (horse racing fans) so nothing to do with football, I went there and nobody knew I was even a football supporter or anything.
So I sit on a table, they offered us candy and waited for the mayor to make a speech, mainly about the activities of the orphanage I expected.
To my surprise I noticed various pieces of small paper on every table and out of curiosity I picked some of them to see what they were.
So what do I read ? It was poems with lewd verses about the other teams !
I did n't make a comment, sat and waited for the mayor.
So the mayor comes, there was a small band playing music as well and he made his speech.
What he said was "Pireaus port will burn if this sentence is not repealed - I came here to warn the government minister and everybody !"
The govt was New Democracy and what sort of mayor was that ?
He was a New Democracy mayor who the year before managed to defeat the left wing former mayor.
So -in effect- if New Democracy wanted to win in Piraeus again they had better behave !
True to form the sentence was repealed, the match was played, Olympiakos won 2-0 and at the end of the season won the league by the narrowest of margins - thanks to the reprieve.



 

Edited by cosmicway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, YorkshireBlue said:

You can be as sensible as you like, fighting over football will never Peter out.

What won't happen is politicians getting their act together and also politicians of different countries working together I 'm afraid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cosmicway said:

s there a cure ?
There is and it is called Margaret Thatcher.

🤣 🤣

Totally wrong I am afraid. She made some reactive public statements after Heysel when Liverpool  fans murdered 39 people. She tried to get her rat Sports Secretary Colin Moynihan introduce ID cards. It fell flat on its arse. The 80s when Thatcher was in power were the hooligan Glory years. Away games for Chelsea were like invasions, absolute carnage. The decade culminated in Bradford and Hillsborough disasters thanks to the tory press, such as the Sun having League tables of the best hooligans. The 80s were the decade of hooliganism, the ten years Thatcher presided over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fulham Broadway said:

🤣 🤣

Totally wrong I am afraid. She made some reactive public statements after Heysel when Liverpool  fans murdered 39 people. She tried to get her rat Sports Secretary Colin Moynihan introduce ID cards. It fell flat on its arse. The 80s when Thatcher was in power were the hooligan Glory years. Away games for Chelsea were like invasions, absolute carnage. The decade culminated in Bradford and Hillsborough disasters thanks to the tory press, such as the Sun having League tables of the best hooligans. The 80s were the decade of hooliganism, the ten years Thatcher presided over it.

I remember England v. Paraguay in 1986, the match before the hand of god.
It was a stadium full of NF hooligans. When England players were walking outside to collect balls for a throw in they were being shrouded by an NF flag hanging from the terraces (much to their dismay).
But nevertheless M.T. made a name and afterwards very little things happen when as rightly you say it was absolute carnage.
So whatever, I 'm talking about Thatcher method rather than Thatcherism as such.

Edited by cosmicway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You