SebastienBonny 49 Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 They can not afford him theire selfs, so they need to do it this way..I hope were taking an clausule with the sell of him, no loan back to Belgium unless Genk..Yeah.Wouldn't be good if Anderlecht gets De Bruyne on loan...But I do think Anderlecht is thinking about that deal.Selling Lukaku to Chelsea, getting De Bruyne on loan from Chelsea.There was an article today in a belgian news paper: Anderlecht manager Herman Van Holsbeeck flies to Monaco today to talk about transferring Lukaku to Chelsea. BUT at the same time, also Kevin De Bruyne's manager is in Monaco.Anderlecht would like to sell Lukaku to Chelsea, to buy De Bruyne with the money they get for him, but Chelsea wants De Bruyne as well.They would put him on loan to Anderlecht, but Genk does not want to sell De Bruyne to Chelsea if they'll put him on loan to Anderlecht afterwards...IF Chelsea wants to put De Bruyne on loan, it would have to be to Genk, otherwise they won't sell him to Chelsea.To be continued I guess... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Styles 9,790 Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 De Brune excites a lot, he seems so direct and has great technical ability. Anderlecht are being incredibly stupid if they think Genk will sell him to Chelsea if they think he will end up on loan back in Belgium straight away.What would really be funny is if we weren't aware of De Bruyne at all until Anderlecht proposed a deal and then we just said 'nah we'll have him as well'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave30 728 Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 i would prefer him to stay at Chelsea and be given chances in the first team immediately if we were to buy him , but if we do feel the need to loan out yet another youth player why not loan him to Genk then both parties are happy . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoFear 23 Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 It is not about us needing to loan someone but Anderlecht wanting a forward player in return for us taking Lukaku from them. I would say give them Lalkovic on loan for a year and keep De Bruyne with ourselves. This way Genk would be happy too that we are not sending their player directly to their title rivals !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 De Bruyne ..I fail to see the sense in buying him and leaving out on loan in Belgium . We might sign him on a 4y deal then leave him there for a year so really we are getting him on a 3 y deal or put another way increasing his cost by 25% . More vitally the Belgian league is far below the level of the PL. If we buy him it needs to be now , so he can spend the pre season with us . Get to know the rest of the squad and our training and playing style. If it proves he needs a loan period to gain more English experience then the time for that would be next January with an English club and managerwe could trust. Clubs such as Swansea , Bolton or Burnley might fit that criteria. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madmax 9,219 Posted June 9, 2011 Author Share Posted June 9, 2011 Yeah.Wouldn't be good if Anderlecht gets De Bruyne on loan...But I do think Anderlecht is thinking about that deal.Selling Lukaku to Chelsea, getting De Bruyne on loan from Chelsea.There was an article today in a belgian news paper: Anderlecht manager Herman Van Holsbeeck flies to Monaco today to talk about transferring Lukaku to Chelsea. BUT at the same time, also Kevin De Bruyne's manager is in Monaco.Anderlecht would like to sell Lukaku to Chelsea, to buy De Bruyne with the money they get for him, but Chelsea wants De Bruyne as well.They would put him on loan to Anderlecht, but Genk does not want to sell De Bruyne to Chelsea if they'll put him on loan to Anderlecht afterwards...IF Chelsea wants to put De Bruyne on loan, it would have to be to Genk, otherwise they won't sell him to Chelsea.To be continued I guess...Drogba is in Monaco as well. Cannot be a coincidence. Definitely something going on there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic weeds 446 Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Drogba is in Monaco as well. Cannot be a coincidence. Definitely something going on there.to convince Lukaku's agent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheva. 5,373 Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Drogba is in Monaco as well. Cannot be a coincidence. Definitely something going on there.To make sure nothing goes wrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave30 728 Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 i would prefer us to sign Kevin than Lukaku 100 % Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose M 140 Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Drogba is in Monaco as well. Cannot be a coincidence. Definitely something going on there.Source? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madmax 9,219 Posted June 9, 2011 Author Share Posted June 9, 2011 Source?He was in France this past week for his re-marriage. I read somewhere that he'll be holidaying in monaco after that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamilton 2,120 Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Genk should ask 3 Chelsea youngster if De Bruyne goes to Anderlecht :eyebrows: I can not believe that we would let that happen.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Lukaku_ 13 Posted June 10, 2011 Share Posted June 10, 2011 Why, why oh why are we letting de Bruyne go out on loan? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheva. 5,373 Posted June 10, 2011 Share Posted June 10, 2011 Why, why oh why are we letting de Bruyne go out on loan?I know, imo we could use him next season. Oh well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Lukaku_ 13 Posted June 10, 2011 Share Posted June 10, 2011 I know, imo we could use him next season. Oh well.Exactly. I dont know too lot about him but from what I've heard he's a player who could come in handy for us especially with Malouda and Zhirkov likely to leave. But like you said oh well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swoopz 183 Posted June 10, 2011 Share Posted June 10, 2011 Exactly. I dont know too lot about him but from what I've heard he's a player who could come in handy for us especially with Malouda and Zhirkov likely to leave. But like you said oh well.Who said they're likely to leave? Zhirkov will be a frequent player (I actually think he will be starting) with Hiddinks system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Armour 4,439 Posted June 10, 2011 Share Posted June 10, 2011 With De Bruyne reluctant to moving to a rival Belgian club, Chelsea could loan out one of their own youngsters instead.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incometax 116 Posted June 10, 2011 Share Posted June 10, 2011 to be honest hard to find video on this guy, so i played him in fifa 11 on ps3 and was impressed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ulsterchelsea 3,221 Posted June 10, 2011 Share Posted June 10, 2011 Drogba is in Monaco as well. Cannot be a coincidence. Definitely something going on there.To have a holiday? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ulsterchelsea 3,221 Posted June 10, 2011 Share Posted June 10, 2011 Who said they're likely to leave? Zhirkov will be a frequent player (I actually think he will be starting) with Hiddinks system.Zhirkov said this week or last he was likely to go i think Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.