🇧🇪 Romelu Lukaku

[Stingray 9,441]

Anyways friends, let's enjoy Lukaku as he's starting against Stoke this afternoon, 4 pm English time

Bang in a few others son!

15 pm english time and 16 pm Central European time, simon says :-)

[Keikoismad 162]

15 pm english time and 16 pm Central European time, simon says :-)

Yep, true !

Excuse me sir, I was thinking of Belgian time, my fault

[Mundaka 243]

Against stoke... will be quite a battle i think

[Keikoismad 162]

15 pm english time and 16 pm Central European time, simon says :-)

Edited!

[Mufassir08 2,400]

God thomas is awful

[Mundaka 243]

WBA loses the ball way to often

[Keikoismad 162]

What a bad first half

[Mundaka 243]

Lukaku just missed a nice chance , but had little time to really control it, header around minute 65

Subbed at minute 75, had nearly no good chances but did pretty good in general, did what he could do.

[Blue Gino 377]

http://www.expressandstar.com/sport/west-bromwich-albion-fc/2013/03/15/ben-foster-warns-stoke-of-romelu-lukaku-threat/

I apologize if someone already posted this interview with Ben Foster talking about Romelu. Lots of encouraging stuff in this interview. I'm glad Lukaku is coming back. The timing is right to get that young Belgian nucleus together on the pitch for Chelsea next season, growing together. It won't be hard to find backup strikers to play behind him.

[BlueLyon 9,359]

Man United is looking for Lewandowski. They already have Rvp, Rooney,Chicarito, Welbeck. City will probably end with Jovetic along Aguero, Dzeko/Tevez. Lpool has Suarez, Danny and possibly Gameiro to join.

I love Lukaku idea of being starter, BUT we will never make it top two if we start season with Lukaku, Ba and Torres/Lambert/Kone...get real Rvp, Suarez, Aguero can score 20goals+, Lukaku might end with 15-18, but he wont have same effect in our team. When opponent plays vs Wba they dont press as much as they do against Chelsea. Besides, comparing Rvp, Suarez and Aguero with Lukaku is that they can decide the game alone. Lukaku is more a target man or poacher ala Higuain/Gomez who score lot of goals, but cant produce brilliance regulary. Lukaku is young and is evolving, but he isnt the man to lead Chelsea yet. Our striker must be good enough to ease the pressure from Mata and Hazard, Lukaku is more in development and needs to develop further. Either we loan him or make him second striker, because I feel that as much fantastic he is now and I would pick him as starter now over Ba or Torres anyday, but next season he wont fulfill the expectarions and we will be dissapointed. Sure he deserves a chance, but if we want to try win PL next year or be competitive with Manchesters and in CL, we need striker ala Cavani. Or we can play Lukaku, make him world class striker, but next season will be similar to this one. Period.

[The only place to be 11,313]

Man United is looking for Lewandowski. They already have Rvp, Rooney,Chicarito, Welbeck. City will probably end with Jovetic along Aguero, Dzeko/Tevez. Lpool has Suarez, Danny and possibly Gameiro to join.

I love Lukaku idea of being starter, BUT we will never make it top two if we start season with Lukaku, Ba and Torres/Lambert/Kone...get real Rvp, Suarez, Aguero can score 20goals+, Lukaku might end with 15-18, but he wont have same effect in our team. When opponent plays vs Wba they dont press as much as they do against Chelsea. Besides, comparing Rvp, Suarez and Aguero with Lukaku is that they can decide the game alone. Lukaku is more a target man or poacher ala Higuain/Gomez who score lot of goals, but cant produce brilliance regulary. Lukaku is young and is evolving, but he isnt the man to lead Chelsea yet. Our striker must be good enough to ease the pressure from Mata and Hazard, Lukaku is more in development and needs to develop further. Either we loan him or make him second striker, because I feel that as much fantastic he is now and I would pick him as starter now over Ba or Torres anyday, but next season he wont fulfill the expectarions and we will be dissapointed. Sure he deserves a chance, but if we want to try win PL next year or be competitive with Manchesters and in CL, we need striker ala Cavani. Or we can play Lukaku, make him world class striker, but next season will be similar to this one. Period.

Give the kid some fucking support. I know you love the idea of us buying every single player in the world, but saying we can't finish top 2 with a guy who shows so much already is ridiculous. He has the right attitude, he loves this club and he's scored 13 goals in his first proper season in the league.

The teams you're mentioning DON'T have the goals from other areas like we do. Look at Mata and Hazard - we need a guy who runs the right lines to create space for these guys, and chips in with a dozen or so league goals. I'm fed up with the constant slighting of our youngsters. You said Chalobah wasn't ready in another thread, I asked why and I got radio fucking silence.

This kid has the tools. This kid has the attitude. He needs the support and he needs a chance.

But yeah, let's go buy Cavani who is UNPROVEN IN THE ENGLISH PREMIER LEAGUE (that's the one we play in FYI).

[Korea 734]

Man United is looking for Lewandowski. They already have Rvp, Rooney,Chicarito, Welbeck. City will probably end with Jovetic along Aguero, Dzeko/Tevez. Lpool has Suarez, Danny and possibly Gameiro to join.

I love Lukaku idea of being starter, BUT we will never make it top two if we start season with Lukaku, Ba and Torres/Lambert/Kone...get real Rvp, Suarez, Aguero can score 20goals+, Lukaku might end with 15-18, but he wont have same effect in our team. When opponent plays vs Wba they dont press as much as they do against Chelsea. Besides, comparing Rvp, Suarez and Aguero with Lukaku is that they can decide the game alone. Lukaku is more a target man or poacher ala Higuain/Gomez who score lot of goals, but cant produce brilliance regulary. Lukaku is young and is evolving, but he isnt the man to lead Chelsea yet. Our striker must be good enough to ease the pressure from Mata and Hazard, Lukaku is more in development and needs to develop further. Either we loan him or make him second striker, because I feel that as much fantastic he is now and I would pick him as starter now over Ba or Torres anyday, but next season he wont fulfill the expectarions and we will be dissapointed. Sure he deserves a chance, but if we want to try win PL next year or be competitive with Manchesters and in CL, we need striker ala Cavani. Or we can play Lukaku, make him world class striker, but next season will be similar to this one. Period.

Nah brah, Your being too optimistic. If Ba and Lukaku are the number 1s, we are aiming for top 4, not top 2... Also, we are probably making it to group of 16 in UCL....

[The only place to be 11,313]

Nah brah, Your being too optimistic. If Ba and Lukaku are the number 1s, we are aiming for top 4, not top 2... Also, we are probably making it to group of 16 in UCL....

That's amazing - you can predict that based solely on our strikers and not making any mention of the midfield (which is the root of every single fucking problem we have right now) we might have?

We can win the league with Ba and Lukaku up front, although I think we need a third similar to Kalou (could well be Moses) IF we strengthen the double pivot. We have enough goals behind the striker in my opinion, we just need a striker who does what Lukaku does.

It's very easy to say we should buy a big name striker but that has implications - to our ability to spend in other areas, our promotion of young players like Lukaku and it's not without risk.

We need to start doing things the right way and if we're not going do that voluntarily, then maybe we need to be forced to do it by missing out on the CL for a season. There are instances throughout sport of circumstances forcing teams to make the changes that eventually bring them success - maybe we need to be forced to do things we're too stupid/scared/timid to do ourselves.

[Mundaka 243]

I prefer positioning/workrate/finishing over technical aspects in our ST, and lukaku has those, ok there are ones who will be better in link-up play n stuff, but thats not quite what we need, we need one that is willing to run to/keep defenders buzy, and i can assure, the fridge will keep them buzy, liverpool defenders couldn't sleep prolly after he passed through. Someone who we can play a ball to and hold it while we counter, presses much.. and lukaku is good enough in all of those already.

[Backstreet09 499]

Nah brah, Your being too optimistic. If Ba and Lukaku are the number 1s, we are aiming for top 4, not top 2... Also, we are probably making it to group of 16 in UCL....

That's like the most depressing shit I've heard all day . I know well with Lukaku and Ba , It'd be more of a miracle winning any trophies but theirs a thing called fate ^__^

[Korea 734]

That's amazing - you can predict that based solely on our strikers and not making any mention of the midfield (which is the root of every single fucking problem we have right now) we might have?

We can win the league with Ba and Lukaku up front, although I think we need a third similar to Kalou (could well be Moses) IF we strengthen the double pivot. We have enough goals behind the striker in my opinion, we just need a striker who does what Lukaku does.

It's very easy to say we should buy a big name striker but that has implications - to our ability to spend in other areas, our promotion of young players like Lukaku and it's not without risk.

We need to start doing things the right way and if we're not going do that voluntarily, then maybe we need to be forced to do it by missing out on the CL for a season. There are instances throughout sport of circumstances forcing teams to make the changes that eventually bring them success - maybe we need to be forced to do things we're too stupid/scared/timid to do ourselves.

Well, lets look, keeping everything constant on Chelsea (besides Lukaku coming in) Also, I've stating many times how are midfield sucks, if you did not know....

1. Man U= Is Man U going to get worse next year? Probably not, if anything they are going to make another marque signing and improve somewhat.

2. Man City= This year they def. underachieved, so, in most likelihood, Mancini is out and potentially the new manager will bring some positive energy to the club. Also, they will prob bring in another highly ranked forward.

Can Chelsea overtake them? Possibly, but realistically, probably not.....

Also, what UCL team has a 20 year old leading the line? 00000000

[Korea 734]

I prefer positioning/workrate/finishing over technical aspects in our ST, and lukaku has those, ok there are ones who will be better in link-up play n stuff, but thats not quite what we need, we need one that is willing to run to/keep defenders buzy, and i can assure, the fridge will keep them buzy, liverpool defenders couldn't sleep prolly after he passed through. Someone who we can play a ball to and hold it while we counter, presses much.. and lukaku is good enough in all of those already.

We need a hold up striker and a person that can link the ball well to everyone else...... Ba kind of does that, Torres tries, but he's not that type of player...

I don't really see Lukaku as that type of forward yet.........(Maybe he will develop into that, however, as of now, why bring him in, when he can play first team at WBA?)

[OneMoSalah 8,886]

We don't need 3 strikers who can score over 20 something goals each because Oscar, Hazard and Mata are goal scoring players too. Mata has 18 this season, Oscar has 9, Hazard has 11, Ba has 16(?) and Torres has 18. Thats 72 goals between 5 players even though Ba scored 12 or 13 for Newcastle. I'm unsure whether or not my numbers are right though, I was trying to recall from the top of my head haha. Also throw in Lampard, Cahill, JT, Ivanovic, Luiz, players who are all capable of scoring goals too. As long as other players are scoring and helping the strkers we have, we don't exactly need 3 20-25 goal a season strikers. We could do with the option tbh but if we take Lukaku back, keep Torres and Ba then I think we will be fine if the MF players also help out. Plus if we don't loan Romelu and sign Falcao or Cavani how will he get games? He wont........ we need to start playing the younger guys regardless of 'we could have Cavani or Falcao'

[The only place to be 11,313]

Well, lets look, keeping everything constant on Chelsea (besides Lukaku coming in)

Which we won't.

[Mundaka 243]

I don't really see Lukaku as that type of forward yet.........(Maybe he will develop into that, however, as of now, why bring him in, when he can play first team at WBA?)

Because, unless we pay more than 30M there aren't better options.

Btw manu will have to be happy if they end in top 3 next year, with another year for giggs/scholes/rvp/ferdinand/vidic... they will feel that. Pretty confident here in top 2 next year, even if we didn't buy anyone else.