Chelsea Sack Andre Villas-Boas

[Fernando 6,585]

You are a clown, get some balls.

Neither is being a flip flopper....

[Peace. 4,352]

Not a very wise thing to do, since they are multi-milionaries that gave so much for this club in past seasons.

AVB is multi-millionaire that gave us nothing, there is no reason to you stop watching Chelsea because of this guy.

Yes there's a reason why I will stop watching Chelsea if they win against André. It is merely because Chelsea isn't their toy. If they want to play despite being shit, and having a big fat check at the end of every weeks, they should fuck off to Emirates. I won't watch a team managed by a bunch of old egoistical underperforming players who are pleased with their mediocrity.

You say they give so much to this club in the past, true, but since I am not a scouser I am looking toward the future, and all I see them giving to us in the future, is mediocrity.

Edited February 14, 2012 by Peace.

[BleedsBlue 1,549]

Not a very wise thing to do, since they are multi-milionaries that gave so much for this club in past seasons.

AVB is multi-millionaire that gave us nothing, there is no reason to you stop watching Chelsea because of this guy.

Its good to know that you aren't an Arsenal fan.

[Peace. 4,352]

Why there is no players unrest at Manchester City ? Why there was unrest under Scolari but not under Mourinho, or under Ancelotti?

Go and check ManC's squad. You'll understand why there's no un-rested players.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

Thats embarrassing. This guys gave this club a lot of things in the past, if there is unrest its because he is pathetic.

Why there is no players unrest at Manchester City? Why there was unrest under Scolari but not under Mourinho, or under Ancelotti?

The multimillionaires put next to zero effort in our last game then turn onto their coach and go way out of their rights to criticize him disrespecting not only the manager but the club and it's fans in the processes. And you say it's disgraceful for me to to point out that the are at fault??

[Fernando 6,585]

Not a very wise thing to do, since they are multi-milionaries that gave so much for this club in past seasons.

AVB is multi-millionaire that gave us nothing, there is no reason to you stop watching Chelsea because of this guy.

Talking in past tense?

Like Liverpool love to do?

[Henrique 9,133]

Yes there's a reason why I will stop watching Chelsea if they win against André. It is merely because Chelsea isn't their toy. If they want to play despite being shit, and having a big fat check at the end of every weeks, they should fuck off to Emirates. I won't watch a team managed by a bunch of old egoistical underperforming players who are pleased with their mediocrity.

You say they give so much to this club in the past, true, but since I am not a scouser I am looking toward the future, and all I see them giving to us in the future, is mediocrity.

Dont try to use my words. I did not say I want to live in the past, or that this players should stay here next season. I'm only saying Its not worth stop watching Chelsea because of André Villas Boas, since he is the one using Bosingwa, insisting with Malouda and as soon as Essien recovered he put Romeu in the shadows again.

I'm really looking into future, thats why I believe it will be a disgrace if we give the portuguese another season, at least some players are good enough to be squad players next season.

[Henrique 9,133]

The players dont want AVB because he doesnt have a clue, hope he will get the axe as soon as possible.

[Peace. 4,352]

Dont try to use my words. I did not say I want to live in the past, or that this players should stay here next season. I'm only saying Its not worth stop watching Chelsea because of André Villas Boas, since he is the one using Bosingwa, insisting with Malouda and as soon as Essien recovered he put Romeu in the shadows again.

It could be André, Santa Clause or Elizabeth II, it doesn't make a diference to my eyes. The thing which would bother me, is that old average players who would be the "boss" at the club. If it was Messi, Xavi and Puyol who would lead the front anti-AVB, then I wouldn't mind, since they are exceptional players, but no, this is only Lampard, Malouda and co, i.e. mediocre players. And finally, if it was Abramovich himself who was to sack AVB, without being adviced by the players, I would still keep watching Chelsea.

Edited February 14, 2012 by Peace.

[BleedsBlue 1,549]

It could be André, Santa Clause or Elizabeth II, it doesn't make a diference to my eyes. The thing which would bother me, is that old average players who would be the "boss" at the club. If it was Messi, Xavi and Puyol who would lead the front anti-AVB, then I wouldn't mind, since they are exceptional players, but no, this is only Lampard, Malouda and co, i.e. mediocre players. And finally, if it was Abramovich himself who was to sack AVB, without being adviced by the players, I would still keep watching Chelsea.

Little harsh there don't you think,Mikel would be a better example.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

The players dont want AVB because he doesnt have a clue, hope he will get the axe as soon as possible.

And what if the next manager who comes in decides to relegate them to the bench and they start another coup. My point here is, regardless of André's abilities these players will always cause turmoil in the dressing room. Until they are gone & André's allowed a shackle free attempt to have a go with Chelsea, we shouldn't be so quick to hit the 'sack' button.

[Henrique 9,133]

It could be André, Santa Clause or Elizabeth II, it doesn't make a diference to my eyes. The thing which would bother me, is that old average players who would be the "boss" at the club. If it was Messi, Xavi and Puyol who would lead the front anti-AVB, then I wouldn't mind, since they are exceptional players, but no, this is only Lampard, Malouda and co, i.e. mediocre players. And finally, if it was Abramovich himself who was to sack AVB, without being adviced by the players, I would still keep watching Chelsea.

Okay, feel free to stop watching the team you claim to support because "sacking AVB would mean old average players would become the boss".

I wont stop watching it even if zolayes and his assistant eldo replace AVB tomorrow.

[diskoviolente 425]

The players dont want AVB because he doesnt have a clue, hope he will get the axe as soon as possible.

And what next ? Sacking the next one in Feb ?

Henrique, I seriously don´t why you are a football fan. I get the serious feeling that you just in it for the glamour and money that Chelsea represented in the past.

I am not saying you are a plastic supporter, obviously you are not as you keep "supporting" the club and ask for AVBs head imidiatly when there is a slump. I can´t remember, but were you one of the supporters that wanted Carlo gone as well ?

Give us an insight into your future plans/ideas for Chelsea Football Club, will you.

Football isn´t all hush and push. I don´t want to bring in the ole Fergie or Wenger, but obviously the fans/board stuck with them and look where they are now.

You are asking for the impossible, mate.

It is simple math isn´t it. There are 16 players per game available and 1 manager plus assistent manager trying to set them up and demand them to do what they get paid for a lot of dosh. So, if it doesn´t work in a game, do you think it is down to the one person or the 11 on the pitch who are not pulling their weight ?

[Henrique 9,133]

And what if the next manager who comes in decides to relegate them to the bench and they start another coup. My point here is, regardless of André's abilities these players will always cause turmoil in the dressing room. Until they are gone & André's allowed a shackle free attempt to have a go with Chelsea, we shouldn't be so quick to hit the 'sack' button.

You are assuming they are starting a "coup" because they are on the bench. Lampard played the last game, Terry did not played because he is injured, Drogba is not here, neither is Kalou, and the only "old guard" on the bench last game was Malouda.

If Lampard is on the bench some matches, it means Raul Meireles (an almost 29 years old player) is playing. Lampard is playing bad this season, but he is still better than Raul, because the portuguese is almost 100% useless every match.

You should wake up and realize that there is nothing changing in this current season, the papers say about AVB trying to refresh the squad? How? As soon as Essien recovered he put Romeu in the shadows again, the player he is using to replace Lampard in some macthes is, as I said before, a 29 years old avarage one.

He buy a new and young CB and what happens? He decided to use Ivanovic as a CB and keep insisting with Bosingwa in RB. Why in the hell if there is an old guard unrest, the reason should be because "they are on the bench" when all I see every game is the same old guard?

[manpe 10,861]

There are 16 players per game available

11+7=18

[LDN Blue 7,903]

You are assuming they are starting a "coup" because they are on the bench. Lampard played the last game, Terry did not played because he is injured, Drogba is not here, neither is Kalou, and the only "old guard" on the bench last game was Malouda.

If Lampard is on the bench some matches, it means Raul Meireles (an almost 29 years old player) is playing. Lampard is playing bad this season, but he is still better than Raul, because the portuguese is almost 100% useless every match.

You should wake up and realize that there is nothing changing in this current season, the papers say about AVB trying to refresh the squad? How? As soon as Essien recovered he put Romeu in the shadows again, the player he using to replace Lampard in some macthes is, as I said before, a 29 years old avarage one.

He buy a new and young CB and what happens? He decided to use Ivanovic and keep insisting with Bosingwa. Why in the hell if there is an old guard unrest, the reason is because "they are on the bench" when all I see every game is the same old guard?

Those are good points, and to a certain extent true. However they are professionals and they shouldn't be crying to Uncle Roman because things aren't going well results wise. That's the problem there is at this club where certain players are allowed to have too much of a relationship with the owner, that it constantly undermines the coach time and time again.

Not saying AVB is totally faultless in what's going on at the moment, of course he has flaws, but the players shouldn't be allowed the level of power that they have in the club.

[diskoviolente 425]

11+7=18

ah shit, i forgot that there 7 subs, for some reason i thought it was 5.

Anyway, makes it even worse.

[Henrique 9,133]

Those are good points, and to a certain extent true. However they are professionals and they shouldn't be crying to Uncle Roman because things aren't going well results wise. That's the problem there is at this club where certain players are allowed to have too much of a relationship with the owner, that it constantly undermines the coach time and time again.

Not saying AVB is totally faultless in what's going on at the moment, of course he has flaws, but the players shouldn't be allowed the level of power that they have in the club.

Again, the reports arent saying such a thing. In fact AVB called an extra meeting where he thought he would stamp his authority and it seems the players just lost their patience and told the manager he also is in an awful form.

[eldo 868]

Again, the reports arent saying such a thing. In fact AVB called an extra meeting where he thought he would stamp his authority and it seems the players just lost their patience and told the manager he also is in an awful form.

There's AVB out thread. You should post there.

[Idiot 71]

The Team isn't in the position to criticize the manager at all. They don't deliver at all so they should focus on their own performance... Even with bad man managment they should be able to do better