Hiddink V Jose

[Henrique 9,133]

:goodpost:

When people say this manager is the most successful in the club, i feel like they should get slap!

You comparing apple to peanuts! The amount of money that has been giving to the past managers gives a big disadvantage to those of pre-roman.

If any, it should be look at as the best manager so far in the Roman era.

Pre-Roman you have great coaches that have work wonders with a lesser budget then most managers we have had today.

Forget Bielsea !

The problem is that you can realize many Chelsea's supporters still have the mentality of small club's supporters, like people saying Carlo's last season wasn't that bad, or that he should stay because "in the past was a dream for Chelsea staying in second position", so his perform wasn't that bad.

I see Chelsea nowadays as a club that can beats Manchester, Real and Barcelona, so second position is not a dream nor pragmatic and classless football.

[Shane 2,275]

Forget Bielsea !

The problem is that you can realize many Chelsea's supporters still have the mentality of small club's supporters, like people saying Carlo's last season wasn't that bad, or that he should stay because "in the past was a dream for Chelsea staying in second position", so his perform wasn't that bad.

I see Chelsea nowadays as a club that can beats Manchester, Real and Barcelona, so second position is not a dream nor pragmatic and classless football.

I Hiddink came, and finished second, got knocked out of the Champions League at the Quater final stage, and didn't win either cup, and played 'claseless' football as you call it, Would you want him sacked aswell?

[Henrique 9,133]

I Hiddink came, and finished second, got knocked out of the Champions League at the Quater final stage, and didn't win either cup, and played 'claseless' football as you call it, Would you want him sacked aswell?

World is not black + white.

Only results is not enough to sack a manager, what matter is how and why those results came.

[eldo 868]

With all due respect. Chelsea's last major trophy was back in 50s.

Mourinho being the most succesful manager in club history is not big deal, specially its only 8 years of Abramovich Era.

If Mourinho had taken pre-Abramovichs Chelsea and managed to win back to back PL I will understand this "best manager in club history". Its pure statistcs.

Its not the case, he took a team with a stellar squad. 2 PL trophies was expected for such a team.

3 FA Cups and 2 Cup Winners' Cups before Roman came?

If Guss becomes our manager, spends 100m and wins 2 PL trophies it will be the same.

[Cosmin 2,484]

Hiddink.

[neel 257]

I really hope We win a CL soon to people forget this guy. 4 years later and his ghost keep coming back time to time.

I rather see Carlo staying forever than people wating for the return of the Messiah.

Amen

[TomCFC 356]

The Special One.

[Madmax 9,219]

In a nutshell, Mourinho > Hiddink.

But I know who I'd want at Chelsea.

[warnie_666 1,081]

Special one is tactically the best out there but I do agree with Henrique on the fact that Against Liverpool he committed tactical blunders. One goal in 6 champions leave games against a side struggling to finish top 4. That's just ridiculous. Had he been more adventurous we would have won a champions league and he still would have been with us