Rmpr

WOW, Sweden must be very proud! 4-4

You must learn how to do the famous Caipirinha, it is a wonder. 1st: Choose a fruit (strawberry, pineapple, kiwi, grapefruit, etc) and cut it into pieces (does not need to be very small); 2nd: Add 2-3 spoons of sugar; 3rd: Smash the fruit and sugar so they blend together and the fruit is small enough to pass through the straw. 4th: Fill the cup with ice; 5th: Fill the cup with Sake (rice wine), Cachaça or Vodka; Obs: It is of vital importance that you pour the liquid after the drink is prepared and with ice. E N J O Y

I can`t stand the wait anymore. It is taking such a long fucking time!

Such a kid yet

Neymar is no scrub, even as a striker he wil work things out. I just dont think we should invent stuff to fit everybody in. If we dont have space for him, then sorry, but he should not come. You do got a point, I just am not a fan of False 9, I enjoy strikers like Drogba, Falcao, Ronaldo (real), etc. For a player we will either get him after 2014 WC (Santos is already looking to extend it until 2016) or pay about 60mi + 150-200k on wages, should not lose his effectiveness!

Mate, they are not strikers. I said it in my first post, I have no problems with height or strengh in midfield. The front man is in 4-2-3-1 to offer diferent qualities to the midfiled. Strength, aerial threat, ability to do pivot to upcoming players, etc. Neymar would be just an adition to what we have with Hazard, Mata and Oscar (an unbelivable adition, but would not open the attacking options).

But I do not have a problem with Rossi, Tevez, Aguero or Messi. I have a problem with Neymar. He would lose his upsides inside the penalty box. He would lose his flair and drible (since it is more crowded). He is not strong, I mean, Rossi is a monster close to him (Stoke was just an example of a strong team), a lot of his dives are just because he falls when he gets touched. They all have a decent header, Neymar has none, look at his miss vs China. You gotta admit, as a striker, you must be able to stand and head the ball. For me, Neymar loses 20-30% of what he can deliver as a striker. He just is not a target man! I see where you are trying to get, I think I made my point as well. There is no wrong view here, people see football diferently, they can all work,

No, aerial threat and stoke were two diferent examples. Stoke was to point out his lack of strengh (he is weaker than Oscar), as a midfield player, I dont see a problem, but as a Striker, it is needed. The header, was another example of why Neymar wont perform as a Striker. Maybe it was my english, but I really though it was clear... I think we should move our talk elsewhere, it is not about Falcao anymore.

I dont think you read it well. Try one more time... He is a midget, but he has a good header. Barcelona just dont cross the ball (they dont even take corners), when he had to perform he did, Rome 2009? Neymar, otherwise, has missed some easy ones.

He aint no striker. He played against China and Iraq, do they offer any challenge or physical thoughness? Imagine him against Stoke! It is diferent playing as a winger, you can avoid contact by dribling, but there is no space inside the box. He does not offer a super aerial threat, top strikers have that ability. Falcao, Cavani, Didier, etc.

Just wait... You can save this quote, if he turns out to be great (wich I 100% dont belive) you can do whatever you want. He will improve, he wont become world class though. It is not about EPL style of football, this is bullshit, a talented player is a talented player (anywhere). You can know if someone is gifted only with a few touches on the ball, 5 minutes you already feel his skills. You can see the class of Hazard, Oscar, CR7, Neymar, etc, just buy witnessing a simple training session. I was simply not impressed with Lukaku. He can make a great back-up striker, not a player that would contest a top finisher. RM gets the best of Benzema and Higuain because they need to fight for position.

Because we clearly lack depth in Neymar position. We dont have Hazard, Marin, KDB, etc. We need Falcao (or another senior striker) to fight for Torres starting spot. I dont belive Sturridge will stay and Lukaku isnt good enough. As much as I like Neymar, our THREE MAESTROS should not be benched.

Dont buy Brazilian shirt mate. Dont give those corrupt bastards on CBF your hard earned money!

I always asked myself why english fans downgrade their team. We have a ton of respect for English Team. Although we never lost, people were very nervous prior to 2002 quater finals...

They count less, I dont know the scale but a official match earn a lot more points than friendly. Just like for Golden Boot, if you score in a major league you get a x2, if a lower league a x1.5 or even x1. Anyways, who cares about FIFA Rankings.... It will always be Brazil and Chelsea as TOP TEAM.

Brazil does not play any official game for 2 years. All we can do is fall in rankings...

Euros is a WC without Brazil and Argentina.

Off course we want his money, off course we want Gazprom money and we want Burma money. It is highly unethical, but lets get back to reality and stop dreaming of utopia. The club needs the money, the company needs a way to clean it. Let us have a partnership, it works for me.... I agree with you!

WE HAVE A PARTNERSHIP WITH GAZPROM SO...

EDIT: nevermind.

I get your point mate, but Chelsea is not a selling club. We only sell players that does not offer much on the pitch anymore. The only player I see beeing huge after leaving CFC is Robben, and he is our biggest sale. Unlike some other team....hmmmm.....a Small London Club....hmmm, oh yeah, ARSE.

LMAO, brilliant mate!

WTF HAPPENED? I would not be so patient, as the guy in white shirt.

You make it sound like a bad thing that the media hate us. I like it! We keep proving them wrong and making they look like ignorants. English sports media is shit, sorry but it is (not that Brazilian is any better).

Alright mate, you can belive in whatever you want to belive. I personally dont think he did all these things, but that is not debatable, it is faith. You should have made it clear, people really thought you were only talking about his existence (me, for example).