Fulham Broadway

had to really, otherwise the silence would have spoken volumes

Thing is, with players most of the time they are as good as their last game. Frank Lampard senior drilled it into his son, '' if you have a average/crap match, always have a shot at the end of the game, even if it doesnt fly in it'll stay in the fans memory''. With Oscar, how people would be singing his praises if that audacious effort had been six inches higher on Saturday...probably would have ended in a different result as well

Looks like I was a sucker for a media story. The Secret Footballer (the not so secret and not much of a footballer Dave Kitson) didn't really say he was "leading the revolt" but approached Jose re tactics, the media parasites took that interpretation . In reality that would mean Fabregas got on best with the manager that he got the gig to have a word on behalf of his team mates. Media are like vultures at the moment salivating over the Chels implosion. They love a demise more than anything. So no more bad words for the magic hat wearing gooner barca cunt

I respect your view of Jose Muzchap, but as you know we dont agree. Nothing wrong with 'questioning a shit approach to football' but the allegations, (if true), are of deliberate sabotage. We have laughed at 'agent joe cole' at liverpool, and Cech at arsenal perhaps letting in a couple, but its not reality. This with fabregas, again , if true, is deliberate conceding of a game, costing us points, and ultimately the manager, and untold damage to cfc, when the best thing he could have done is just left. However we know how the media make up rubbish, lets see if any other sources appear.

It's a fucking disgrace if it's even halfway true. Any players who do this to any manager, but particularly one with his pedigree, are arseholes. How dare they let the club and especially the supporters down like this. If they don't like the manager and style, then leave, it's very simple. Bet they were thinking about our negativity while taking their 500 selfies with the PL trophy after the Sunderland game. Cunts

Gooner barca cunt has led the revolt according to Express http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/616465/Chelsea-Revolt-Jose-Mourinho-Cesc-Fabregas-Arsenal-Premier-League

welcome back CM

Wasnt having a go BB So true, too many negatives piling up, preparing for the inevitable now. Wouldnt be Chels without a circus.

Hes usually right, but quite often spouts bollocks.If there was substance to this, you'd think it would be in the broadsheets, rather than an article on eurospurt..

Could get messy if it all comes out that Ivanovich/Hazard or some other player has been hanging out the back of her

Mr Abramovich to you. I dont know the bloke.

just checked on wiki, yup, hes Russian

That is how the Russian has operated before, but has he learned the revolving door isnt necessarily the best way ?

Good read For there is another way of looking at this debacle — although it won't have occurred to those secretly revelling in Mourinho's downfall. It's not him, it's them. It isn't Mourinho who is the obvious underperformer, but his team. Who has the true c.v. of substance here? Nemanja Matic, for instance, with his one fine season in English football, or Mourinho's eight national titles and three European trophies across four countries? What if last year, not this, was the exception? What if Chelsea overachieved when winning the league, swept along by Mourinho's astute organisation and one last, inspirational turn from captain John Terry? What if 2014-15 is the only season Eden Hazard is Footballer of the Year? That makes Mourinho the genius, not the jinx. He won the league with this lot? He won the league with a team now playing like the poorest champions in history? He won with single-season wonders, and old men, and players with a greatly inflated regard for their abilities and options? If there are rebels inside Mourinho's camp, this is what they have failed to consider. That onlookers — managers and owners at other clubs, in particular — will wonder what is the real Chelsea.

No you cant. Then again I dont just randomly post "Zolayes is a troll". Probably why I'm a mod and you're not. You always look for a personal argument, now back on topic.

No, I mentioned Cech, is that OK ? Mourinho was opposed to the offloading to the Arse, so potentially the others as well. You dont know, I dont know, so its disingenuous to assert 'he got rid' as fact. You only get warning points if you are provocative and aggressive, not for pretending to be a martyr.

lol that just sounds soooooo made up

To me its a total simplification, an unproven statement, and doing Mourinho a diservice in glibly stating 'he got rid'. Most of these decisions are made by a team of several CFC staff especially Mr Emanalo. Mourinho would have some input, granted. Conversely, it is common knowledge, for instance, Jose was vehemently opposed to the selling of Cech. Who's to say he didnt feel similarly about one, or several of the players you've mentioned ?

Lol probably not. Its probably because brana is married.

So many rumours flying about. About the grassing player etc The one about Jose telling Ivanovich and Eva to end their affair, seems far fetched, but Googling Eva Carneiro and Ivanovich brings up a few results. If he was fucking her, it explains a lot....

Rather than sack Mourinho, a better option to me, seeing as we all know his skills,would be a player clear out of the under performers. Rebuild in January as much as possible with hungry players. I dont want to keep harking back to Ferguson, but it is relevant as almost everyone was saying we need continuity when we'd sacked about 8. Ferguson was allowed to build 3 complete squads during his tenure. Players who joined wanted to give their best - because of the status of Ferguson, mainly because he was Man Utd personified, and that was because of his length of legendary service.Theres no reason if we get through this without a rash sacking and avoiding the Stamford Bridge revolving door, why Mourinho cant become a similar talisman.

True but it seems pretty kneejerk for people to demand his sacking now. It may be the route, it maybe thats what Mourinho wants - but we will never have continuity if the manager that has brought so much to the club is dispensed with in his first bad patch. By the same token , I would not want the board to hang on to a manager for 10 years with a bare troohy cabinet, the way a certain North london club has with a tetchy Frenchman. I would like to think the club are pragmatic, and allow some fluidity, cash flow for January, but I would also like to see Mourinho play players in their right positions ffs.

Falcing shite

I just want Roman to stand by a man who has brought the club many happy times. We can't be sacking a manager after just 2 or 3 months of poor results on the back of years of great results. We win together, we lose together would be my message.

3 Premier league titles for our club Chelsea 3 League Cups for Chelsea An FA Cup for your team Chelsea 2 CL Semi Finals for Chelsea A Community Cup Not bad for a Chelsea manager. But if hes the "best Chelsea manager my ass". Yeah Bobby Cambell comes close. Vote hasnt changed btw. A