Magic Lamps

Utd look set to make a new record of turnovers, but mena re not committing forward at all

Utd give the ball away every couple of minutes, but we are not clever enough to capitalize on that

German commentator letting the rip over SAFs ref hypocrisy, rightly so, so.o. speaks about that in the public for once

shit simulant Hernandez

too wasteful from us, even though Utd are vulnerable at the backa s much as we are

fuck hernandez again. sas sson as carricks ball floated in i knew this was gonna go in. wtf does cech there?

2 of these were scored from blatant offside positions.

it was meant ironicially

yeah, Rooney in the double pivot.

lol. I guarantee u, u will be the one to fuck off.

But you are quite convincing in you role as angry, retarded, Romanian farmer.And no it makes no difference. Zenden is a Romanian fool is the same as Zenden is a foolish Romanian. Just says that u are Romanian and a fool. + I did not really hear anything of your "atmosphere". Maybe it was not loud enough for the microphones. When u go to Stamford Bridge u still have a better atmosphere. When you don't care what 5 people u do not know think of you, why are you trying to point sth out to them? We do not care about your team no one has ever heard of, we do not care about this game, we do not care about the competition, and we do not care about you calling us stereotyping and insulting. And if u want I can also call u all retarded Romanian farmers +any adjectives u wish is that enough for u to stop spaming the forum?

yeah, he will fly passed him. We probably needed a coproduction of the Sun and that clown to construct such an abject sentence. wonder what fly passed him. Actually it happens many flies pass me every day. That is just because flies are so damn small and fast and i do not care about them passing me. But if Bucharest fielded flys they surely had an advantage cos they do not get stuck in the swamp they call pitch. Coincidentially it is also their natural habitat so of course they had an advantage. This result has nothing to do with Chelsea or with Lamps being to slow or with a player no one has ever heard of. our player simply did not care about this match. If they wanted to win this joke of a competition, they would smash this shit site with Lamps scoring a hattrick, but it is simply not worth the effort. This clown should shut up or he provides us with a reason to actually put in a bit of effort and drive them back into the caves they have come from.

What did I start? Did I offend u personally. Did I say you are a retarded farmer? U might make one of yourself by bitching around here but if you would call a stadium full of Germans retarded German farmers I would not give a fuck. And as I stated before, i did no intend to offend you or Romanians in general, but if you feel offended by that, I do not care, because in that case it is you problem being a hypersensitive pussy, nothing more.

Never going to happen. Rooney is a classy player, but i would not want us to go for him. Rooney means trouble and it is improbable our next manager would be as patient with him as Ferguson. Chelsea is a middle-class club and that is not only history. Most of our players have their A-levels or equivalent, are predominantly good-looking, groomed and cultivated individuals. Now look at Rooney. He has always come across as brutish, scruffy, repellent chav, probably the ugliest man in English football next to Tevez and Ferdinand. So he is a perfect fit for the Liverpool/Manchester sinkhole and their proletarian clubs and clientel. He will never come here, i am quite sure he will go to spain if he leaves Utd.

Yeah, sorry, u are so civilized and advanced you come to a forum and the first thing you do is to try to insult its members, that is just so mature and mannerly.

What was a bigger blunder by Roman. Buying Torres or hiring Benitez? On the one hand Torres has been doing his damage since 2 years and cost 50m, still we won the CL in his time. Rafa has cost us 2 titles in 2 months, relegated us from 2nd to 4th but has cost not that much. (OMG it feels so sick that we even have to pay our scourges)

when will you realize than "u can ask anyone" statements are no arguements. Even extremely successfull coaches like Guardiola and great players like xavi have talked shit and only because they have a subjective oppinion it does not mean it can't be wrong. Ferguson and Trappatoni are also is great coaches, still 80% of what they say is bullshit. When you see these individual awards there are many succesfull players and coaches who give their opinion so it is not subjective any more but intersubjective which is far more valuable from an epistemological point of view. When I see Lamps has won 39 of major and minor awards and Scholes only 7 minor awards, this is quite a statement. other than "u can ask bla bla bla", "neutral would pck", "if u ask all the other great midfielders bla bla" , which are only your wishi washi impressions.

Well maybe it is because I have only been in football since 2004 and Scholes has been a marginal note in the 9 years since then but I have never seen him as anything even close to Lamps and analyzing his achievements, statistics and highlight reels i still do not see anything he is better at. watch this One of Lamps's strenghts has been his long range passing, I do not see anyone who is better at it. He still plays 70 yard pinpoint passes every game.

nope. my post is somehow not complete. I meant i had to dig really deep to actually find soem awards scholes has won. he has been voted into the team of the decade of 1993-2002, Lamps has been player of the decade 2000-2009. Lamps has also won 39 individual awards to Scholes 7. Lamps also won 4 times player of the month, 3 times pfa team of the year to scholes's 2, Lamps has won silver award in european and world player of the year, world xi and countless other awards scholes can only dream of. That is why all in all Lamps beats scholes and gerrard in terms of all relevant statistics and individual awards. Lampard has been massively underrated in terms of individual awards throughout the years and still has collected almost 6 times as much as scholes has.

@ Lamps vs Scholes vs Gerrard 1.Lampard prime > Gerrard prime > Scholes prime In 2005 Lamps and Gerrard both were in there prime. Lamps was 2nd in world player of the year, gerrard 3rd, beaten by a distance. Scholes has never won an individual award of any significance 2.Lampard overall > Scholes overall > Gerrard overall (see below) reflected by performances, stats and statistics respectively. https://twitter.com/...1651584/photo/1 They are not quite up to date (from end janaury or so)and only premier league but, updating and including more competitions only influences these stats even more in Lamps's favour, cos Gerrard has only assembled a massive 3 goals since then whilst Scholes has recorded a bombastic 0 goals and 0 assists. Lamps has scored at least 5 goals. If u include all competitions Lamps has 266 goals which is about as much as Scholes and gerrard have combined overall. Also Lamps's 0,3 goals per game ratio beats them both comfortably with 0,2 and 0,23 respectively. Interesting is also that Lamps has more goals in the league alone than either Scholes or Gerrard have overall( which are more matches). Also for England Lamps has a far better scoring record than both. Lamps has outscored Gerrard in 13 of the 17 seasons they have played in parallel, including the including the last 4 running, even though being older, outassisted Gerrard in every season they have played in parallel i have checked so far, outassisted and outscored Paul Scholes in every season since 2004. Scholes's prime 2000-2005 is not even close to Lamps's 2005-2010 in terms of goals and assists and most importantly titles. Yes titles. When Scholes had the biggest imapct on his team during his career before becoming a bench player in these years he won 2 leagues, 1 fa cup, Lamps won 3 leagues, 4 fa cups and 2 league cups when he had the biggest impact on the team. Now i have dug really deep to find some individual awards Scholes actually has won. He has been in the team of the decade 1992-2001. , Lamps has been player of the decade 2000-2009. Lamps has also won 39 individual awards to Scholes 7. Lamps also won 4 times player of the month, 3 times pfa team of the year to scholes's 2, Lamps has won silver award in european and world player of the year, world xi and countless other awards scholes can only dream of. That is why all in all Lamps beats scholes and gerrard in terms of all relevant statistics and individual awards.

Do you really think it is a good idea to run a competition between our countries? There are countries who where or even still are communist that have become powerful but only one country has lost two world wars, has never had mineral resources and still has risen to one of the world's wealthiest and mightiest countries in the world. We have not done that by being ignorant, actually we have courses about other countries economies in school. There I learned that most companies only invest in Romania to pickup subsidies from the EU.As soon as these subsidies expire, they will be gone as fast as you can say mamaliga. I know many Romanians are anticipating much from the EU but the truth is, the EU and their stupid subsidies can only temporarily ban the rules of the competition. When you are not competitive in the next 3-5 years u will be as ill off as before with the only difference being that u have a massive loans to pay back. I wish u would succeed but I do not think so, I expect the inclusion of Romania backfiring the same as Greece's did. The problem with Romania is the massive inflation, in 2-3 years the wage costs for companies operating in romania will be the same as in Germany, but the workers are less skilled. Also Romanian workers are known for job-hopping. They use their trainings in Germany, France or UK for having job interviews at other firms there. that is why the companies such as Nokia, Bosch, hella, Marquardt will either go back or exploit new markets like Bangladesh, Indonesia etc. Some firms might start to invest in Romania, but they know they will only do it once.

1.Lampard prime > Gerrard prime > Scholes prime In 2005 Lamps and Gerrard both were in there prime. Lamps was 2nd in world player of the year, gerrard 3rd, beaten by a distance. Scholes has never won an individual award of any significance 2.Lampard overall > Scholes overall > Gerrard overall (see below) reflected by performances, stats and statistics respectively. https://twitter.com/BigJohnTerry/status/291291194531651584/photo/1 They are not quite up to date (from end janaury or so)and only premier league but, updating and including more competitions only influences these stats even more in Lamps's favour, cos Gerrard has only assembled a massive 3 goals since then whilst Scholes has recorded a bombastic 0 goals and 0 assists. Lamps has scored at least 5 goals. If u include all competitions Lamps has 266 goals which is about as much as Scholes and gerrard have combined overall. Also Lamps's 0,3 goals per game ratio beats them both comfortably with 0,2 and 0,23 respectively. Interesting is also that Lamps has more goals in the league alone than either Scholes or Gerrard have overall( which are more matches). Also for England Lamps has a far better scoring record than both. Lamps has outscored Gerrard in 13 of the 17 seasons they have played in parallel, including the including the last 4 running, even though being older, outassisted Gerrard in every season they have played in parallel i have checked so far, outassisted and outscored Paul Scholes in every season since 2004. Scholes's prime 2000-2005 is not even close to Lamps's 2005-2010 in terms of goals and assists and most importantly titles. Yes titles. When Scholes had the biggest imapct on his team during his career before becoming a bench player in these years he won 2 leagues, 1 fa cup, Lamps won 3 leagues, 4 fa cups and 2 league cups when he had the biggest impact on the team. Now i have dug really deep to find some individual awards. He has been "player of the decade 1992-2001

Actually I did not intend to offend you, neither did I write anything to suggest so.My observations are meant to be completely unbiased, which I am glad to elucidate. Fact is the major part of the Romanain population work in agriculture. It is also a fact that Romania is one of the least developed countries in Europe. Additionally, to my mind, shaping the conditions of a football match the way the audience and those responsible for the stadium did is not a sign of progressiveness. For me these indications where enough to warrant this colloquial generalization. Furthermore, I am not upset my team lost today as I accepted my teams decision not to win this match as the conditions and the match program make it unpractical and the existence of the home leg unnecessary to put in the required effort. Now i am curious whether the team decides to beat Steau by a high margin or to deliberately quit the competition. Btw have always been strongly against Romania joining the European Union, as it drastically weakens it economically. Still i have no antipathy against Romania or its inahbitants at all. It is simply my opinion as it is my opinion that it is a shame how this game was staged by the hosts and it was not worth being contested from the very beginning. That does not make me offensive towards you or Romanians in general, neither does it justify your offensive choice of words against a fellow board member. I only apology to those of the 55,000 who actually are not retarded and feel offended by that term, but I did not know how many i should subtract so i left it at 55,000.

A pitch that looked like it just had been dug over by some of the 55,000 retarded Romanian farmers whose only aim was it to distract our players by whistling and gleaming with cheap laserpointers, a ref as clueless as most of his kind, anti-footballers like Benayoun and Torres on the field, a fat Spanish waiter being responsible for our tactics, the thineest squad and the most games of all teams in the european top leagues. What do you expect?

No problem. I have learned not to give a shit about your opinion, cos all you do is listing some ridiculous theses (often random) theses and renounce giving any arguments for these, usually after quoting other members, even though your post seldom has anything to do with their texts. As a reminder, here is a little sample: "The board's decisions are what is best for the club"(yeah, exactly), "Lampard is not going to change anything when he comes back"(how many goals has he scored since?),"Mata is on course to a 25 goals 30 assists season...."(speaks for itself),"Scholes is better than Lampard"(still funny), unbiased Stating of facts like Scholes never having won an individual award and is small and ginger "is the biggest pile of shit I've ever read on the Internet". You are outdoing yourself again and again, so keep on babbling.