We Hate Scouse

It's disappointing to see him banned to be honest. He had strong opinions, but they created discussion and debate. Something that is very lacking as of late. I personally think this will be a negative for the site.

Only two that I'm aware of, as previously stated in this thread.

It's just the kit that they pitched to the board. Mock kits were obviously created to sell the brand to the board. I don't know who has been chosen yet.

The kit pitched to the board is similar to the away one here (obviously in home colours). It has the crew neck but it has double piping on the sleeves and also along the bottom of the shirt. It does look very nice and sleek.

Under Armour were the other brand to pitch to the board. Not sure if there has been more, I'll see what I can find out.

Why else would these other brands be coming to Chelsea with shirts that they've made pitching them to the board? I doubt it's just for banter......

I don't know the ins and outs of it to be honest. Just the photos I've seen of the mock shirts.

There's been Nike and another well known brand pitching to the board. Unless Adidas offer us big money they'll be gone unfortunately.

Not for long...

He's already gone unfortunately.

No.

I find it rather amusing how people react. In 27 (TWENTY SEVEN) European countries this would've been deemed completely legal. No questions asked. Everyone would go about their day as usual. No news stories. No sackings. Nothing, but because here in the UK it's 16 everyone is going mad. What makes the UK age right? If he left it a few months until she was 16, again he's fine to pound the fuck out of her. What difference do those months make? What does she learn? What does she develop? When you put it in to perspective it gets rather tedious. I understand the laws there to protect children, but in my eyes this wasn't a child and they did not need protecting.

You mean to suggest that we can't assume that Emenalo is single handedly the issue, that only we notice and not anybody of importance of the club? That he decides every transfer alone and also decided to sack Mourinho? Preposterous, he's completely to blame...at least that's what these uninformed, ignorant morons would have us believe. Imagine trying to get a man sacked based on absolutely nothing.

Cringe worthy.

I wouldn't put it past people to bump this thread each time he scores saying how much we need him now

The FA have already said that they won't facilitate 2 teams in 1 stadium as it would ruin the fixtures. Won't happen.

Hearing talk that a transfer is imminent. No word on who it is etc.

Because it's the managers job to control the team?....

Regardless, we bring RLC on and he fucks up and loses us the game that could be a huge detriment to his confidence and impact on his progress. It simply wasn't the sort of game for youth.

Sick of people lambasting Hiddink for not selecting RLC or playing youth. It's his 2nd game in charge, he'll still be assessing the squad and will obviously stick with the current first team this early in to his tenure and in a game as big as United away. The youth will get a lot more chances under Hiddink than they did Jose. Mark my words.

National team management and club management are incomparable. Ridiculous to make a decision based on that.

Sissoko.

Isn't it now done on head to head instead of goal difference? Porto beat us 2-1 so they'd go through on a draw. We have to win.

Insane rumour

It already got rejected by the Football League when proposed.