Leif

I only wanted him when I thought we'd be missing out on the CL next season, as I'm sure he'd be great for a team in the Europa League. However; who on earth could imagine - "The European Champions have just signed Victor Moses from Wigan Athletic to solve their winger problem." ? I actually think this guy would be fantastic in the Bundesliga.

Looks like he's ours. Marseille are about to sign Boenisch on a free. He can play right or left back. He's too good for Marseille to just be a back-up option, and they can't afford to have him AND Cesar on their wage bill.

If you've ever watched the anime/cartoon AND played the game a decent amount, this HAS to make you smile at least a little bit!

To celebrate my 800th post! Woooo! (No, they're not mine.)

Ooo, that was a delightful pass to Elia(?).

Young viewers shouldn't be allowed to watch this match. That was complete rape.

.... :o :o :o :o :o

I'm not even taking the piss - Peter Crouch.

We simply must go for one of 3 formations in my opinion - Manchester City's 4-2-3-1. Arsenal's 4-3-3/4-2-1-3 Brazil's 4-2-1-3 I won't go into a big analysis of how they're different from our current 4-2-3-1. It should be obvious enough.

SHOOSH! I WANTED TO SOUND LIKE A SMART ASS! Thanks for ruining it. But you're right.

Let's have a raise of hands from those who think we're going to be signing the oil-rich Premier League champion's starting right-back based on stories without quotes.

What do we think then? Will he play for Werder Bremen tonight vs. Borussia Dortmund? Or will this be too early for him considering he's just got there?

About to destroy my girlfriend(my hand). Woohoo!

Shoulda been working on his game instead of RT'ing everyone yesterday.

Why are you to telling people to keep their opinions to themselves (On a FORUM for fuck sake) AND launching a personal attack to everyone by telling us to "SHUT IT"? It's not cool to just randomly instigate.

Since this is the most active thread right now, I'll be cheeky and put this here - WHAT A PASS FROM OSCAR!

Of course. There's always a way around it though. "To not see" and "not to see" are completely different phrases; both of which are correct when used in the right terms. I know you're trying to be smart now, but I did use "not to see" correctly. You're simply not familiar with the phrase. So you can slate me previously for taking spelling & grammar seriously, but then you take a little flag which in all honesty, has nothing to do with anyone else on this forum, seriously? Double standards. Finally; you DID suggest, in my opinion, but I won't try and portray that opinion of mine as fact as you were rather vague. If there was a misunderstanding on that part, then that's fine.

Well that was fun. I assume there's a hit out on me now where all my future posts are dismissed etc. Similar to Kojo. (Apologies for bringing you into this.)

Excuse me? Of course that counts. As the conversation progressed, it changed from "Stamford Bridge" to simply "Have you seen them live?". I hope you knew that before entering this conversation, otherwise you shouldn't be in it.

Ever heard of a paper round? Well this is embarrassing. "To not see" was actually written with perfect grammar & spelling. LOL. Now a lying bastard? Just ask anyone on here - Last week my flag was the Brazil flag, and the week before that the English flag. Yet again, an invalid 'point', if you could even call it that. Oh really? I seem to remember you making reference to my join date and then suggesting I hadn't seen many, if any, games before this season. Correct?

Have you read the previous posts? If not, I'll excuse you for not picking up the sarcastic tone in my comment.

...what? Signing Oscar has shown that we're improving? How, may I ask? Ah I see. And what position did Moses play last season? When we got rid of Ferreira? What? Since when is Essien a defensive midfielder? Did I miss something? At least makes your points correct, man! Never once did I imply I was better than you. You've simply chosen to interpret what I've said that way, without asking in which tone I was speaking, or, in a more literal matter, typing. So you're now saying that my OPINION is WRONG? In none of my posts to you did I state a single fact - Everything I've said to, up until this post anyway, was opinion. Who are you to judge whether someone's opinion is correct or not? Now you're even telling me what I'm judging my opinions on! :') Brilliant. Again, I clearly said READ MY EARLIER POSTS. You clearly haven't, otherwise you would know by now why I stopped watching. Incredible.

Go and get a job if you don't have one. Get a second job. Get a third job. There is money all over the world. There is no excuse to not see Chelsea playing live. Go outside right now, and find people who need help. Help them out, and then claim your reward - money. See? Yet another accusation based off of nothing. I don't even live in Scotland, nor have I ever supported a Scottish team. So TIME and QUALITY are 2 factors somehow combined into what makes an acceptable accusation? Your original accusation was that was a suggestion that I wasn't a 'real Chelsea supporter' because I joined rather recently. Never did you mention anything regarding the quality of my posts.

Here I am. I take it back.

Well you've got enough for clothes, food and internet don't you? Cutting back a bit and you'd have more than enough to go to Stamford Bridge. So don't you fucking dare question ANYONE on this forum whether they're a 'true Chelsea fan' or not. I'm not going to pull out the easy card which is - You're a glory hunter. You're Polish yet supporting an English team etc, because I don't need to. I was going to say that me pulling out that card has zero substance, just like your accusation, but actually, mine has MORE substance as you've already admitted to never being to a game. You're basing your accusations off of a joining date, and therefore, there is very little to discuss; especially considering it seems you've never been to a Chelsea game.