Jase

This game has just become even bigger.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/chelsea-avoid-points-deduction-blues-9450896?ICID=FB_mirror_MF It's not for the incident at City, but because we're repeat offenders.

The cautious, pessimistic Pizy is back!

More like you calling people "clowns"

Errr...

GO OR YOU ROT IN THE RESERVES!

I'll stop slandering you if you stop being a twat.

Andre Villas-Boas makes stunning £60m bid to bring Chelsea's Oscar to China next month We would be stupid if we turned turn this down!

Yeah...and look at the knee jerkers who liked his post.

Fantastic news! Azpi deserves it. Epitomizes what consistency is all about.

I don't necessarily disagree with the double standards point but this has nothing to do with that, no? We all have seen Karius' been making mistakes and what he's not done right. Neville gave his assessment - which wasn't even over the top - and that was it. Karius wasn't the first player Neville has criticized as a pundit and he won't be the last. Yet for some reason, Karius and Klopp seem to have taken this totally the wrong way (and it's ironic too, given he said he doesn't listen to criticism but went on the attack on the two Nevilles yesterday). Heck, Carragher has criticized Karius too but I don't see he or Klopp overreacting to it. Why? Is it because he's one of them? No one has said Neville was a resounding success at Valencia but you can't ignore the fact that there were other factors didn't help him at the club, apart from his own inexperience and that it was his first job into management. And just because he failed as a manager, that doesn't mean he's suddenly clueless as a pundit. Takes more than just judging players to be successful at a club. Let's also not forget not too long ago, many regarded him as the best pundit around and to use his time at Valencia to say he's suddenly not cut out to be a pundit is just nonsense.

Think Simeone may taken Atletico as far as he could. Feels like this would be his last season at the club.

Yes, Klopp was right about that but was he right to question Neville's credibility as a pundit just because he failed as a manager? No. That's just poor from Klopp. On a different note, yes, Neville wasn't successful at Valencia but was he that bad as he's been made out to be? The club are one big mess right now, from top to bottom. Even the more experienced Prandelli is struggling at Valencia.

Simeone...shambolic manager in a shambolic league? Beginning to wonder if you're a troll. Sure, Atletico had talented players even before he arrived but look at their results and what they achieved before he took over and after he took over. And going by your logic, I guess you could say the same about Conte too, no? People only wanted him due to where Juventus ended up in the table. He's shambolic manager who managed in a one-team league. Juventus had talented players even before Conte's arrival.

No thanks. He might be great going forward but he's defensively and tactically rubbish, which are two important characteristics you also need as a wingback.

Am I seeing things? Pizy is confident about a Chelsea match? We're so gonna drop points at Sunderland.

Klopp vs The Nevilles is just I know managers are supposed to defend their players in the public but I don't get why Klopp is even wasting his time with the criticism when he has more concerning issues, and his jibe towards Gary Neville over his failure at Valencia was just low and desperate.

Don't think this has been mentioned yet but credit to Conte for tweaking the system yesterday as well, not just changing the personnel. Started with 3-4-3, switched to 4-1-4-1 when that wasn't working, got the goal and then went to a 5-3-2 to see out the win. Not exactly ideal that we sat back after going 1-0 up but we defended well, didn't give West Brom a chance and got the job done. So, well played.

If you need some optimism, they only need to survive 4 more games before the cut off date.