Fernando

Giroud earned his start. Now he can go back to the bench to be a sub. Tammy had a good rest and now he can return to the lineup.

Still not worried. I didn't expect us to challenge for tittle this season. But what I'm seeing is what I thought we would get, burn out. Some players have been overplayed like Werner and Mount. Also Kai after Coravirus has not been up to standard. How a nice winter break would work wonder for us, but we will have to pick up. Rotation is needed in the coming weeks. That being said I still see us picking up form and finishing comfortably in top 4.

I don't think we have a chance. But this is in February so a lot of things can happen between then.

Just our bogey team. Nothing to worry about. On to next game.

Iranian teenager who posted distorted pictures of herself is jailed for 10 years Instagram star Sahar Tabar says she is still hoping for a pardon after conviction for corrupting young people https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/11/iranian-teenager-jailed-10-years-distorted-pictures-instagram-sahar-tabar

What is this?

Another failure in CL

Lampard son, as some said here as the reason he gets picked.....

No good word when winning but as soon as when no win people come out of hidding?

Yeah I thought a draw was about right.

I don't think we win. I will be actually surprised if we win. I'm going for a tie or a lose.

Don't worry as soon as we lose this thread gets filled. People just love to come out of the shed when we lose for some reason.....

Don't worry he will be run to the ground and dip in form come January-February. Then we will hear the Lampard son comments.

That's why we need Rice and give the boot to Jorginho.

Miss many chances, that is a bit worrying.

Can't pass this Mount!

Running Mount to the ground and as well Werner. Not good.

You can ask a question about free will freely in the first place. If free will did not exist then your question has no essential meaning because it's just pre determined biological processes causing sound to come out of your vocal cords.

Truth claim = your rising above the bondage of total subjectivity. If your totally determined, your pre wire to think the way you do. So you can't make a truth statement. The moment you make a truth claim your violating determinism.

Well I will pray for you. And no I don't believe in killing people or forcing you to change. It should never be about that because then it wouldn't be love, but a violation. Take care and have a good day.

You did not prove anything. Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able, and willing? Thence whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? 1. I'm not arguing for omnipotent, i'm arguing that only using that 1 rule then yes he is not omnipotent. But if you use other stuff god is love, god is all knowing, god is everlasting etc etc then you got to take each side without creating a contradiction. 2. You can argue that not willing makes he seem malevolent but we are stuck in this side of eternity that we can't see past all the angles. In nature there's some animals that must suffer in order to help develop to fly and fend for themselves. If they where to get helped they would be weak. We don't know enough to come to that conclusion 3 Whence cometh evil? I answer that but you don't want to accept, it came from Lucifer that rebelled against god. 4. And last neither able nor willing, I think my point 2 answer that.

What is the opposite of free choice? Is it pre determined? Now let me ask you, are you free to answer that question? Are you making a truth claim?

Those fundamental are important because you are tying disprove God based on 2 concepts of all powerful and and all good. So then I state okay let's take away God from the equation then you must answer other things that explain why God does not exist. If God does not exist then how we as evolving things got any conscious to decide what is wrong and right? So my main point was how you decided that, as far as law and what not? And you state that the modern nations do that. And laws are amended as we progress. Hence we collective decide what is good and wrong?

What is at the founding? How did we get consciences to set that up? How did we "collective sense organization" in the evolutionary process? Anyhow we are set up now and if we go by that, then it seems like a herd mentality. We go by circumstances.

? You chose to not answer my question. How do we create our own laws, how we determined right and wrong. Unless your answer is based on herd mentality? Based on what the modern world is doing?