Fernando
Everything posted by Fernando
-
You can ask a question about free will freely in the first place. If free will did not exist then your question has no essential meaning because it's just pre determined biological processes causing sound to come out of your vocal cords.
-
Truth claim = your rising above the bondage of total subjectivity. If your totally determined, your pre wire to think the way you do. So you can't make a truth statement. The moment you make a truth claim your violating determinism.
-
Well I will pray for you. And no I don't believe in killing people or forcing you to change. It should never be about that because then it wouldn't be love, but a violation. Take care and have a good day.
-
You did not prove anything. Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able, and willing? Thence whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? 1. I'm not arguing for omnipotent, i'm arguing that only using that 1 rule then yes he is not omnipotent. But if you use other stuff god is love, god is all knowing, god is everlasting etc etc then you got to take each side without creating a contradiction. 2. You can argue that not willing makes he seem malevolent but we are stuck in this side of eternity that we can't see past all the angles. In nature there's some animals that must suffer in order to help develop to fly and fend for themselves. If they where to get helped they would be weak. We don't know enough to come to that conclusion 3 Whence cometh evil? I answer that but you don't want to accept, it came from Lucifer that rebelled against god. 4. And last neither able nor willing, I think my point 2 answer that.
-
What is the opposite of free choice? Is it pre determined? Now let me ask you, are you free to answer that question? Are you making a truth claim?
- 16,129 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- governments
- laws of countries
- (and 1 more)
-
Those fundamental are important because you are tying disprove God based on 2 concepts of all powerful and and all good. So then I state okay let's take away God from the equation then you must answer other things that explain why God does not exist. If God does not exist then how we as evolving things got any conscious to decide what is wrong and right? So my main point was how you decided that, as far as law and what not? And you state that the modern nations do that. And laws are amended as we progress. Hence we collective decide what is good and wrong?
-
What is at the founding? How did we get consciences to set that up? How did we "collective sense organization" in the evolutionary process? Anyhow we are set up now and if we go by that, then it seems like a herd mentality. We go by circumstances.
-
? You chose to not answer my question. How do we create our own laws, how we determined right and wrong. Unless your answer is based on herd mentality? Based on what the modern world is doing?
-
So then we as human, as a society can create our own rules right? Of what we we feel is right and wrong? No God in the equation, okay let's go with that. So now we are society that does not include God in our decision making. We create our own rules of right and wrong. So how would that go? Is it based on what we feel? The circumstances we are in? etc etc
-
Okay I see your an atheist and you believe the concept of good and evil is a construct. So as an atheist what you believe? How do you view good and evil? What is your take, how do you see it? And last what is the purpose of death, what role it serves in this world that we are in?
-
A short video about that question that you asked.
-
I answer, I said how you can create an oxymoron? Omnipotent in what way? Is Omnipotent to create an oxymoron? then no! Can an omnipotent God force people to love and yet God in it's nature be love? It's an oxymoron. So your fundamental question is flaw because you take one side of the aspect of God and reject all other aspect.
-
Well that is the only answer we have for where evil came from. But if you want to go more deep it actually came from Lucifer a created being that rebelled against God. So the initial rebellion started with an angel and then trickle down to humans. Now evil exist, what we call sin. And the question is how to get rid of sin from our body if we are born with that?
-
I like philosophy, and I can answer those questions. First of all evil came in to humanity when Adam and Eve sin. And after that every human born had that corruption dna in them. So the question is then, if we have this corruption how do we "clean" that? In addition God being omnipotent cannot create an oxymoron. Example, being omnipotent does not means you can do everything, like lying. If God says he is truth then he cannot lie. There is no lie, so he would not lie to be "omnipotent" That being said we have learned that God is love, and when you take that into equation love cannot do certain things, so in that sense there's some stuff that God cannot do! For example, God cannot force you to love him otherwise it would be forced, rape, etc etc. If I put a gun to my wife and tell her to marry me, if would be forced and would not be loved. Giving that god is love there's some things to consider: Love requires: 1 Freedom Freedom involves: 2 Risk Risk entails: 3 Responsibility and responsibility enables 4 Growth. When ever you think about God, using the concept of "omnipotent" is an incomplete picture. If you start your view with God is love you will see certain parameters that have to be meet.
- 16,129 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- governments
- laws of countries
- (and 1 more)
-
And that's why those guys should be discredited. When God gives a prophesy it comes to pass 100 percent. These guys, God never spoke to them, they just speak out of their own mind.
- 16,129 replies
-
- 3
-
-
- governments
- laws of countries
- (and 1 more)
-
I will be surprised if we win against Spurs. I think Spurs are a bit more experienced and coach nice by Mourinho. Mourinho does good in his second season usually.
-
Mendy is the deal that made us be more solid. Doesn't hurt to have Silva, but without Mendy we would not be this solid. He is the real deal, the hire to Cech.
-
November - December time frame was the appointed time for me to see the real deal. And have to say I'm glad I waited and I'm seeing the results that I thought we should see by this time frame. That being said I'm still cautiously optimistic.
-
Test passed.
-
We don't have a great bench. But when everyone is fit it's much better. Hence no problem with the big squad we have because injuries happen a lot.
-
I just want to comment on this. It sounds just like what the democrats tried to do this whole 4 years under Trump. And they where allowed to do that as in their right to contest everything. Everyone has this right, now it's Trump turn with all his millions......
-
As long as Mendy is in, I'm fine.
-
Well this is what I just read recently: CNBC: Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani joins Pennsylvania court case seeking to deny Biden victory after other attorneys quit. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/17/trump-lawyer-rudy-giuliani-asks-to-join-pennsylvania-vote-case.html Seems like there's a court case going on.
-
I don't think it will get to there. I think if the court concludes that everything was legit he will have nothing more to say. So let's hope the court can conclude this very fast in the coming days.
-
Interesting stuff. It is true, whoever had the vision to scout and buy into Belgium in that time did amazing. Too bad we screw up everything because of Mourinho and company.
