Fernando

You had me till you said that Paulinho is a potential upgrade to David Luiz....

Is he ready enough to come back to Chelsea in the new season? Or will it be a case of too soon like KDB?

It seems like every striker A. Madrid buys is a hit. Maybe we should steal their targets!

Totally agree. Although if we get rid of David Luiz, Mikel, Lamp doesn't really come into the equation since he's on his last we will be left with Ramires and Matic. Don't want to count Van Ginkel yet, because it's like Kalas. Might have some promises, but Mourinho might not trust him. So that's a wild card to put your eggs in. Paulinho would be a decent addition but we would still need another CM. Unless we promote from within.

Lamps should not even be in this equation anymore. Ramires why does Mourinho like him so much? He offers nothing to our attack. At least DL offers more. So it will be dumb to get rid of David Luiz, if players like Mikel and Ramires are still here. I said it before, it's only good business if we use the money to buy someone better. Or if we promote from within, but I'm not holding my breath for that. Many managers have come and go promising to promote youth.

How long does it last for the one hot seat before moving to another?

So was Benitez..... That's why they brought him here for!

It was also rdm fault because he chose Torres over sturridge!

One thing your wrong is that the transition period started after the double from Carlo. The following season we started to get rid of players and trying to implement youth. That didn't work so we just bought youth with potential. So we really been in transition for a couple of years now. What has not helped is the changing of managers.

Did he said that with this look?

I think every manager that mocks or puts pressure on refs should be fine. I'm tired with this monkey business of putting pressure on the refs. But the FA should not have a double standards. If they fine Mourinho for saying something negative against the ref, they should do it for other managers as well.

Would be awesome to have Lavezzi, fucking beast! That guy will help us win the quadruple!

We did gave away Sturridge to Liverpool for a cut price after they screwed us over with Torres. So our club ain't the best in that department. Let's hope Mourinho puts a foot down, and don't let us take like mugs.

Hog wash, why would any1 pay 35 mill for that guy? If you say 15 or maybe pushing it to 20 then maybe. But even then I don't think he will solve our problems. I rather get Paulinho then him. But we still need DLP.

But if he thought highly of himself he would have known that he would pass those guys. If you can't make it above Torres and Ba, then your not as good as we thought. Anyhow I'm with the ones that say that the loan to Everton was beneficial for him. For us, had he stayed I bet he would have been a starter ahead of those duds I mentioned.

The B team is interesting. But then what happens with the U-18, U-21 and such?

Former Fulham owner Mohamed Al Fayed has blamed the removal of the Michael Jackson statue outside Craven Cottage for the team's relegation.

Here it is lads the Sky Sport post match feed. Jamie Carragher was so close to tears when he was analyzing post match game!

I'll take Lavezzi. He's another cunt, but we need cunts in our teams. Tired of the sissy girl like attitude like Torres!

What I want to know is if those sponsorship deal that PSG and City did with themselves will stand? Cause if UEFA let it slide then these two teams will be in the green in less then 5 years as those are massive injection that will count as revenue.....

Rules are rules, and we all agreed to it.

Yes, but if FFP hasn't come out of nowhere then you should know that FFP also had in mind sanctions step. First a fine, then point deductions and finally ban. It was an escalation punishment to repeatedly offenders.

What you mean pointless? The 50 million if it was only that it would have been pointless for a very rich club. The other punishment are of real consequences and best option then out rightly banning them. Cause it shows that UEFA is giving chances to teams to get their act straight. You imagine if we screw up once and break the rule? Do you want them to ban us right of the bat? No give us a chance to work it out. Now if the same club continues doing the same after having been already sanctioned, then it makes sense to escalate the punishment. But I repeat, you just focusing on the 50 million fine and forgetting the other punishment which are of greater impact!

And they also said that would be the last measured. They said that it will be progressive punishment for those continuously breaking the rules.