didierforever

Early goal. Most important thing. We might be able to set the tone for the week. Put pool and city under some pressure.

Dude, why don't u ask me how many starts willian had this season???LOLOLOLOL.also how many did mata and kdb in half a season. :lol:

Hahahaha.... dude. U do get that it was not me that spent the money on schurrle and willian. Jose did. I am only trying to make someone who has no clue about football understand as to why he did that. So if u think, I am laughable to think that we did right in buying them, then jose should get the same treatment, right? LOL.We needed to strengthen on backlone??? Lol. Gc-jt-dl as cbs. Azpu and iva as rbs. Bertrand and cole as lbs. Lol. U r absolutely right dude. This chelsea team is more reliant on STs rather than AM and cms. Oh wait!!!!! Lol. The feeling is mutual dude. Lol.

Hahahahahaha... lol-max. Lets sign usain bolt. Cos all we need is pace. lol.Schurrle has made 32 appearances for us this season. Mine might be funny, yours are hilarious.

Lol. Or u could argue that willian and scgurrle are wingers, pacy, apt at working at both ends of the pitch, something that mata and kdb can't. The sane moses who can't start ahead of sterling? LOL-MAX Were you successful with buying messi as a ST in fifa. Chelsea should have done that too, right? LOL.

Lol. The board would have been wtong.the fans would have wrong. Only thing that matters is JOSE. For him we had our no.1 no.10 in oscar, we had our no.1 LW, , 2 CAMs who would have had to play on the wings and would not fit in (mata and kdb) and 2 ams in moses and marin who well would be useless. So according to thw only person whose opinion mattered, we did need to strengthen. Just havong nos.is not good enough. Too complicated for u. Go back to your FIFA.

lol. Are u running out of footballing points? Going to corrwct my grammar next? Why don't u just give up dude?

Did we have AMs in jose's first stint. Did we have 3 men behind the strikwr playing in his first stint. Are u really now simply gonna find faults with a badly franed sentence rather then answer to what is the most obvious thing thay I wanted to say.Just to make it perfectly clear, I was talking about our currwnt system.

How do I forgwt those guys when u r quoting a post in which I have named all 6 of them... LOL-MAXJose's systems is more reliant on speed and wingers than strikers. Our 3 behind the striker is more important than the strikwr himaelf. We needed speed on the wings which mata definitely doea not give and kdb winning as just a flop here. So, by my logic, jose decided to strengthen in our nost important area and get players which suited our system. Our objective for the season was top 4, plus building for the future which jose thiught we could do with those 3 strikers and with the AM buys. Infact in hindsight, the buys seem very good considering the system we have employed and how much mata and kdb would have struggled in it.

We were stacked in ams? LOL.oscar - no. 1 am. Hazard no.1 lw. Mata- sold cos does not fit the system Kdb- sold cos does not fit the system Moses- can't get a start ahead of sterling Maron - lol. True dude, I can definitely see why jose should not have gone for willian and schurrle who have been a mega part of our seasob. LOL. CM was a much needed reinforcement which mvg was. Basic accounting along with some chelsea knowledge is what is needed here dude. One of which you defo seem to lack. I am talking about somwthing substantial. Not dailyfail reports. Abything concrete? Jose had said before hand that mata would need to adapt, that oscar was his no.1 no.10. That mata would be played as RW.suprising that their was absolutely nothibg about torres.

So what are you basing this on? I am basinf my posts on what I have seen from mou and chelsea. Torres was never even said to be in ANY kind of a deal. We would be very weird if our board was absolutely hell bent on offloadinf Torres. But wait there was nothin. But let your imagination again make you say whatever u want since that is all u having been doing. Let me say this again, this is reality not FIFA/FM. please reply again keeping that in mind. Also lol at what you have understood so far. U do know that we have already acquired a loss of 34 mil for 11-12 and 12-13 seasons and the permissible loss for 11-12, 12-13, 13-14, is just 38.5mil. But since you have eveeything sorted out while playing fifa 14, our board should have done thw same. Lol.simply lol. Simply can't be bothered any nore.

I have had a bid discussion with skipper. Not going to discuss benzema again. People who dint see the classico would say benzema was great against barca as he scored 2. Anyone who did watch the classico would say he should havr put the game beyond barca. But when u just see the stats at the end of the season, they are 2 goals. So numbers don't always say the whole story or even the correct story.

Dude. U really are a piece of work. I ll try and explain it you in the most easiest of the way possible ever. Lets start from the begining. U said we were not ABLE to sell torres. When it could not be far from the truth. We dint want to sell torres. We could not afford to sell torres. Also if u actually remember, we were in for a 30mil rated rooney. We could AFFORD to buy a new striker but selling torres was not even taken into accoubt. Does that give you a hint as to what the actual dynamics of the situation was. Selling torres (for 10mil) this season would have meant a LOSS of 17mil plus losing a striker. How difficult is that to grasp for u?? I ll try to explain it to u like I would to my niece. Torres costs us 19mil a season. If we had sold him we would have taken a loss of 17mil just thru the sale plus the acquisitin of a new striker who would take torres' place (this striker should not be confused with a new striker cos that was different, this striker only replaves torres) would cost 12mil. Hence for just one striker position we woild be spendong 29 mil compared to the 19 we have paid now. Now this season, if we simply subtract the 10mil deleted from the amortized value, the new striker replacing torres would cost us about 19-20 mil which about the same value that torres costs us anyway. Get it!!!! I don't know why its so hard? I am pretty sure my niece has understood it by now. Did u read the article I gave u? If yes then why in the name of hell are u talkinf about essien again. Lamps and cole are CLUB legends. U don't sell them. NEVER. We have 20+ loanees. Last year kdb was one. We earned a mega profit on his sale. What in the name of god has that got to do with this. Infact the system of loaning out and selling/integrating into the squad is so that we can deal with FFP and be safe for the future. How the hell does that effect us poorly by ffp.

dude seriously again!!!! I just explained the dynamics with torres. It is unacceptable to spend 30mil for one position and get a loss of 10mil on that. Also I just explained that if we sell torres this season how much sense it would make. As for by not selling torres we lost out on a PL and other title argument, a club is not run like a fifa game. Jose made it clear that our objective was top 4 and not the title. If we do get the title then its perfect but that is not what we were fighting for. Plus jose and the board thought torres was good enough for that which considering our situation right now, was a good decision. Again, please don't treat it like fifa. When I said youth, how did u get to marin? How is he yiuth or academy related? He was bought last season as a squad player and his transfer was a disaster. Piazon is an investment. Every club will have some players who they think is good enough to nake the next step. Where are u getting at with these things? How is it related to lukaku and /or even qpr/remy?

Hahahahaha. Dude u really are a piece of work. Do u have any idea about FFP and how it works. Here read this and get the basic idea of how FFP works and how a deal like essien helps us. By the way, rhe youth players abd the academy is not included in the ffp so we can have a trillion players on our pay role and not be affected plus we dint make a loss for 2 ywars, infact we made a profit of 1.4mil in 2011-12. Here is the article please read it http://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2014/1/24/5342030/michael-essien-to-ac-milan-the-financial-impact-of-the-transfer And since u seem utterly clueless about almost everythin, I won't bother giving a reply anynore.

First thing first. I have not given any transfer fee number for any of these guys except for remy. So arr u sure its not just anither of your imagination.If the wages of these players are so high, then how are the loan deals possible. A loan deal would be worse off for the finances of the club as they would have to pay some amount of the wages. And if NONE of these players are going to play for QPR again, then why would the board not just sell them for free. People like park, bosi, derry, JC are not getting any younger, are they? Even if they sell them for free, they would still be saving on their wages. Hence nothing yiu have said makes any sense whatsoever. Now let us talk about torres since u so think we are not ABLE to sell torres cos of his wagea. Torres was a 50mil transfer which according to FfP is amortized over the course of his contract. Hence his trabsfer fee costs us 9mil a season (5.5 year contract). Lets say he earns 10mil a season. So for one season torrea costs us 19mil. Now for the sake of argument say we sell him for 10mil, buy a striker for 30 mil, 5 year contract and say 6mil a year wages. Which would mean the new striker himself would cost us 6+6mil a season which is 12mil a season Now suppose we had sold him last summer, his unamortozed transfer fee would be added to the books which would be 27mil. Subtracting the 10 mil we would get for transfer fee but adding the 12 mil more for a striker, we would be spending 29mil for a single striker compared to the 19mil we are spending on torres thos year. And now lets consider if we sell torres this summer keeping all the above prices constant. Torres would cost us 18mil as unamortized value, 12mil for the new striker minus the 10mil transfer fee which overall comes to 20mil for one striker next season compared to the 19mil torres would cost. Which is an acceptable loss. Get it!!!!! We could not afford to sell torres till this summer financially and speciallt cos of FFP. like I said before, get your facts right.

Hahahaha LOL. Just can't stop laughing at they could not finalise a deal for any of them. By the way they could finalise a deal for taraabt to get loaned for fulham, call him back and then loan him to milan but could not get a transfer for him or any of the aforementioned players. :lol: Granero has RM on his cv. He can probably play for a team like cardiff who have medel playong as a DM, yet you are saying that no club in the world wanted any of these players. Plus let me get this straight. U r saying that if qpr get PL next season, none of these players will play for it???

Hahahaha.Go to the costa thread. I wrote almost the sane thing that u did. "KILL MYSELF"

What the f!!!!Do u have any clue at all. Qpr loaned these guys so that if they make it to PL next season, they can call them back. And please check again about whom ALL, qpr have loaned out. It is remy, park, bosingwa, cesar, granero, tarrabt, derry etx LOL, u think a deal could not naterialize for all these players. That is one lazy ass board then. LOL. Why wpuld they risk loaning them out cos A. The players dint want to play in the championship B. Not loaning them would mean permanently losong them. C. By loaning they would get a chamce of having these players backif rhey get PL. So please get your facts right. If chelsea gp to championship, and if hazard says that he does not want to play in championship then we would have to loan/sell him out.

What the hell. No lallana in anyone's team?? If there is a player who deserves to be in the team of rhe year, that's lallana. Marshall Coleman mertesacker JT azpi Lallana Yaya fernandinho hazard Suarez sturidge Subs- cech, GC, shaw, gerrard, rooney, aguero, silva.

The reason remy was sent out on loan was cos people don't want to play in the championship. They would find it derogatory. Its hilarious that u think that If qpr do get promoted, they would still let him go out on loan. No way.

Matic is not available for psg game. And away to psg, I expect jose to go for a draw with a 3 man mid of rambo-luiz-lamps. Plus his experience makes him a dead on starter I think.Also, jose has shown that he does not underestimate any midfield especially away from hime. We have played ramvo-matic pivot against fulhan, wba and villa all away. I totally expect to see a luiz-matic pivot.

Qpr are 3rd and definitwly would take part in play offs. They might ver well even get promoted. Don't see wht they will sell remy then. I sincerely doubt remy has a buy out clause. Specially something as low as 12mil. Atleasr I have never heard bout that.But totally agree that remy would prefer arsen / newcastle.

Oh dear mother of god,,, my nightmare is coming true.

Don't think lamps will start. Specially since we have psg after 3 days.