didierforever

Hahahaha LOL. Just can't stop laughing at they could not finalise a deal for any of them. By the way they could finalise a deal for taraabt to get loaned for fulham, call him back and then loan him to milan but could not get a transfer for him or any of the aforementioned players. :lol: Granero has RM on his cv. He can probably play for a team like cardiff who have medel playong as a DM, yet you are saying that no club in the world wanted any of these players. Plus let me get this straight. U r saying that if qpr get PL next season, none of these players will play for it???

Hahahaha.Go to the costa thread. I wrote almost the sane thing that u did. "KILL MYSELF"

What the f!!!!Do u have any clue at all. Qpr loaned these guys so that if they make it to PL next season, they can call them back. And please check again about whom ALL, qpr have loaned out. It is remy, park, bosingwa, cesar, granero, tarrabt, derry etx LOL, u think a deal could not naterialize for all these players. That is one lazy ass board then. LOL. Why wpuld they risk loaning them out cos A. The players dint want to play in the championship B. Not loaning them would mean permanently losong them. C. By loaning they would get a chamce of having these players backif rhey get PL. So please get your facts right. If chelsea gp to championship, and if hazard says that he does not want to play in championship then we would have to loan/sell him out.

What the hell. No lallana in anyone's team?? If there is a player who deserves to be in the team of rhe year, that's lallana. Marshall Coleman mertesacker JT azpi Lallana Yaya fernandinho hazard Suarez sturidge Subs- cech, GC, shaw, gerrard, rooney, aguero, silva.

The reason remy was sent out on loan was cos people don't want to play in the championship. They would find it derogatory. Its hilarious that u think that If qpr do get promoted, they would still let him go out on loan. No way.

Matic is not available for psg game. And away to psg, I expect jose to go for a draw with a 3 man mid of rambo-luiz-lamps. Plus his experience makes him a dead on starter I think.Also, jose has shown that he does not underestimate any midfield especially away from hime. We have played ramvo-matic pivot against fulhan, wba and villa all away. I totally expect to see a luiz-matic pivot.

Qpr are 3rd and definitwly would take part in play offs. They might ver well even get promoted. Don't see wht they will sell remy then. I sincerely doubt remy has a buy out clause. Specially something as low as 12mil. Atleasr I have never heard bout that.But totally agree that remy would prefer arsen / newcastle.

Oh dear mother of god,,, my nightmare is coming true.

Don't think lamps will start. Specially since we have psg after 3 days.

Damn these guys need an overhaul. Evra, vidic, rio, giggs all gone. Need a left back or 2. Need a center back. Need a DM as carrick has been abysmal. Need a CM to play alongside carrick as fellain, anderson and cleverly are shit. Need at least 1/2 wingers. Plus Need to revamp their tactics as mata on the wings is a joke. They will take some years to challenge for the titke even if u give moyes the benefit of doubt and expect hin to have a decent season next year. Atleast a season where we don't have to see cleverly on the wing against city. That was just LOL.

Not bad actually. Everton shoukd get europa at least and lukaku does need that big nights experience. It would be a good thing for him especially if everton can get CL. As for remy. long shot. Dont think we would be buying a striker for 20mil when loaning out anotger of the same value. That would be a true hit on the FFP. Simply can't see that happening. I woukd rather like a costa-etoo and ba as a 3rd striker. Torrws no where near the club

If only. If only he was actually given a proper run in. He would have been up for golden boot had it not been for injuries.

Dude I was saying all that about benzema not costa.. Infact I was saying how costa, is better than benzema for US.

1 in 3/4 or 1 in 5 IS a big difference. This is PL. specially in a system where strikers don't get many chances and should be taking ones that they get.Take yesterday for instance. Benzena shod have had a hat-trick in the first 10 minutes. He missed let sevilla be in the match and it costed RM their title probably. Pl is a leagur full of sevillas who are adept enough to punish teams who don't take their chances. Hence benzema changes nothing from which we already have. He might get better but he might not. The point is with ushaving a chamce to Iimprove in that particular area, why would we again take a striker who can't takr his chamces. Specially when there are better options. How does that improve us. Its easier to learn to dribble or improve hold up play than to improve finishing. I would rather buy a striker that has goos finishing and can adept to our play than what benzema gives. Again u go back to the number od assists!!!! When you have cr and bale alongside you that number WILL be great. Their movement, dribbling, shots, pace everythin is better than hazard/willian and I don't even include finishing here. Some of the "assists" that benzema givea has more of CR/bale magic than his "superlative" passing. And hia dribbling is defo not better than coata. I would say costa' s weord way of dribbling is one of his strengths. Also its suprising that falcao, mandzukic is not included in your better than benzema list. Specially mandzukic. Hold up play, passing, counter attacking awarenesa, finishing, workrate. Except dor dribbling I won't give benzema an edge over mandzukic in anything. Specially since mandzukic has played in a system which we are looking to emulate. The high pressing, high tempo, letgal at counter attacking team of bayern of last season.

Never said they were not good. Infact they are still one of the best teams in the world. The discussion was very different. It was more of how good are they tactically. I just think the 31 match unbeaten run made them seem better than they were. They were always going to struggle against barca. That run somehow made them the favourites. Despite having bale, isco, illaramendi, I don't think they are better than jose's RM which was tactically more astute. Their subs are decent but when those subs have to replace not just bale/cr but also an injured maria/modric/alonso is when they struggle. Their right backs are pior defensively and marcelo himself is not that greay deapite being one of the best attacking left back. My problem was that RM was made to sound like this flawless machine that would crush everythin in it's path. Simply dint think so.

He misses chances. He doea not fit our system like etoo, I would it would be more like torres. He is consistently in and out of games and simply fails to make ANY impact whatsoever when he is not having a good run. We don't need him. We need an impact player. Benzema is not that. Not even close. Its hilarious how much you are over-hyping him. Infact I would take costa, mandzukic, balotelli, cavani, falcao, rvp over him. I said I would kill myself if we sign him cos I simply can't see how he would be a greater impact than any of the above mentioned strikers. Infact I doubt if he ll be as good as a physically fit etoo has been for us. If a player plays alongside great players, in a shit league, then more than his goals, his general play should be considered and compared with other striker. Cant see anyway and any area where he is better than costa and yet he would be much more costelier. Hence, I ll kill myself. As far as finishing is concerned. You are missing the moment. Suarez and CR can havr a sub 10%, conversion rate and yet score 20 goals a season. They create so many chamces. Benzema does not. And he misses a buck load of chances. Not at suprised with the stats you gave. If u had told me to take a guess for benzema, I would have said 1 in 5 chances, while for costa I would have said 1 in 3/4. When said in percentages 6% barely seems anything but think about it in chances and there is a big difference.

Not really. Specially if pochetino stays. Bertrand is good defensively but offers very little up ahead. Soton like their fullbacks getting forward and helping. Dont think he fits the bill for them

Saw the first half last night. Was prety much useless. Barely touched the ball or even got involved in the game.

Dude, when I used nando 22 goals in an argument, I think I made it clear that I DID NOT want stats specially his assists and goal when he is playing alongside CR, BALE, maria and modric.The only thing I would be interested in seeing (as I said before) , be his chance conversion. And I will be shocked if his chanve conversion is as good as costa's.

Pool vs spurs. Arsenal vs city. Not getting my hopes up but still a chance that atleaet one or both might drop points. Anyways all we can do is simply put away what's in front of US. I don't give a shit about GD as it is a lost cause. Simply get the 3 points.

A. What "mediator" said.B. Iva and sagna are almost the same age and would have to be replaced in a year or 2, maybe together or one by one. Shaw is high in demand. If he goes to city/united then we lose a long term quality left back cos of a year or2 of sagna. Simply not worth it. Infact our future defense should be azpi-GC-zouma-sShaw and next season should be a stepping stone towards that back 4.

But it would not make much difference. Cole is definitwly gone and bertrand after today's comments seems to be on hia qay out as he would in no way be our firat choice.But buying sagna would mean 3 right backs and no real left back. Add to that his wages to sit on the bench and simply no future since he is already 31, he does not seem to fit the direction our team/squad is going.?

Wtf!!! First zanetti and now this goober. We have azpi and iva. Dont need a RB. Shaw and that's it

I don't need to comeback sooner or later. It would change nothing. RM is there for the taking defensively. FACT. They HAVE struggled so far against all "big " teams and you can include bilbao and sevilla in it (4th and 5th placed). There attack lacks creativity especially against good teams and mids who won't offer that extra second or that extra yard for RMs obvious talismans to have a moment of magic. What is actually LOL is that while you went on to say that ancelotti's RM was defensively organized and better than jose's RM, I called it like it was. There has been no jumping of guns here. Had said before that the currenr RM and its tactics were not as good as the 31 match unbeaten streak made it out to be and still do. Ps- our discussion began with ne saying I would take psg over rm ( or something of that sort), and I would still do. Nothing has changed from what I first said. So again, no gun jumping done here.

Despite my lack of football knowledge (apparently), I did call out RM for exactlt what they were. Choke with the game on the line and they were having a really good spell of form. Their defence once showed that it is their for the taking. Block the wings and they seem paralysed. Plus the depth of class from the first 11 to the subs is immense with isco, illaramendi, morata etc simply not able to fill the boots.