Gappy

I'm sorry but I wouldn't want him anywhere near this club again. Second time around was bad enough, and the last thing we need right now is more shite and mud slinging.
Hes' lost his identity now, he's been surpassed and found out by teams and coaches.

Overall Liverpool is above us, but we could do much better tonight.
United is on same level as us though, but I bet we will look clueless again. "Sarriball" apparently, but they will roll all over us until they score and then we will wake up for a bit, Sarri brings on Barkley and another defeat.
I have nothing against a loss if that means development for the future and brings positive to the whole picture. What was positive here? Where were hints of "Sarriball" that will bring us to next level? Klopp was in same boat in the beggining, but at least he played entertaining football and while their defence was shite, they had clear plan forward and needed reinforcements at the back. We play like crap bar couple games and we still lose left and right or barely scrap one goal wins.
We are shit in everything. No attack plan, except for pass it to Hazard. No defensive stability because as soon they press us harder, we look completely clueless. Midfield is nonexistent and lacks any dynamic or creativity. 
We played conte esque bunker tonight. Almost whole season after Sarri arrival. Where is any development of better playstyle? And dont tell me we dont have players because Klopp managed to play entertaining football with Henderson, Moreno, Wijnaldum and other "average" players. 
Last but not least, for a football under attacking manager, i havent seen such shite attacking organisation. Forget the goals or wins. Check Guardiola, Klopp even in their first seasons etc when they attack, there is chance left and right. When we attack, we manage to do it for 5-10 min and thats it. Then all creativity, determination just dissapears and we rely on individual quality in Hazard.
When he leaves, we are fucked for at least 2 seasons.
(And this isnt just based on tonight performance, but whole season). 
All Sarri "realised" is that we apparently cant compete with top dogs unless we park the bus. Duh, we knew that years now. But he was brought to create attacking football. I would understand loss after loss if our phylosophy actualy developed on pitch, if we became more connected in attack, but there is zero improvement since november and we play even worse than first couple months.

I see a lot of people claiming that Sarri got the game plan "right" in the 1st half because it was only 0-0. First off, how far we have fallen. Secondly, its simply not true.
Nothing about "Sarri-ball" was seen in the 1st half.
We couldn't deal with their press as we couldnt pass out from the back.
Sarri had no answer to Jorginho getting man marked
We couldn't build any attacks of note.
Hazard could barely get into the game and was contesting balls with centre backs. He was getting crowded out.
Liverpool were the better team in the 1st half contrary to what Ashley Cole said. It was only a matter of time before their pressure told.
Sarri didn't get anything right. In one of Hazard's last games for the club and a chance to deny these bastards the title, he fucks it up with his insane false 9 fantasy. Someone needs to tell him he's not Guardiola and never will be.

Not even angry or annoyed, really. Liverpool are a class above us right now so we were never going to come here and win when they're absolutely desperate to win.
For weeks if not months we've known that it's all about the EL. Hope for the best in the PL but hope is all it is.
The thing that really pisses me off is how just a couple of years ago we were laughing at and making fun of Liverpool. We were miles ahead of them. In such a short time they've eclipsed us and can laugh at us instead. And the gap will likely get bigger once Eden leaves.

At Chelsea, Mourinho preferred Oscar as he wanted balance in the midfield.  (He already had Hazard in terms of creativity)
At United, he needs Mata as they don't really have anyone else capable of the creative spark. (Rooney's on the decline, Miki is still adapting and Martial is injured atm)

Logic of this place.
The young Belgium that stayed: every time he makes a mistake moan about how we shouldn't have sold Cech and sometimes even more laughably how we should drop him for Begovic.
The two young Belgium we sold: moan every time they score about how we don't stick by young players then whinge some more when one of them is linked with a return.

Disagree, a lot. Aside from Kante I don't really see these excellent buys, considering without Champions League football Man Utd recruited Pogba, Zlatan, Bailly and Mkhitaryan. Think we left it far too late to address our LB & CB crisis, though they could turn to be excellent signings let's not be under any illusion they were plan z. Left it to the final 3 weeks of an already busy transfer window chasing the likes of Koulibaly, Romagnoli only to go back to PSG for Luiz. Not knocking Luiz, but it's more than evident he was a last resort lmao. 
They salvaged deadline day by going for targets that weren't going to be a massive loss for the club in Alonso and Luiz, though I'll give them credit for capturing both at a fee below £40m which seems to be the average.
IMO, they should've had this wrapped up weeks ago rather than 2 games into the season with little-to-no time to adapt.

I hate that I have to keep saying these negative things about all these players because we have lots of very good memories with them. I wouldn't even mind if they were squad players for us but they should not be starting. Unfortunately the club persists with these selections until the players become villains in the eyes of the fans. Ivanovic is WAY past it.

Manager come and go ... Mikel stay forever.
True Legend !!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I am starting to believe that a Belgian with a microphone is more dangerous than a muslim with a bomb.
 

I genuinely wouldn't care. Not even a little bit.
He could win the ballon d'or and I wouldn't give a shit. He is a nothing player and one of many that needs to go as soon as the season is over.

"Oscar is not our biggest problem". After "he is only 20", "he is only 21", "he is only 22", "he is only 23", "he is only 24", and then "he is tired and needs a pre-seadon", etc etc, I think we have a winner among shit on stick excuses "he is not our biggest problem". 
How the fucking hell is not he our biggest problem? We have just one no.10 in our squad. We have just 4 senior AMs and this piece of shit is one of them. Can you believe that. A no.10 who can't create, who can't pass, who can't dribble, has no passing range. What a bloody horrible player. And he is a nailed on starter and the only no.10 in our squad. He IS the biggest problem in our squad. 

Championship level player. 
He cannot be in this Chelsea squad come September. He simply can't. 
Horrific displays week in, week out. 

If we got Conte
At the beginning of the next season will like LVG at Man Utd
He need to finish his job at Italy Int. In EURO first and then start his work here
If Italy go in a deep round it mean he'll has less time to start the season with us
We may lost another Market period and again ... our stars will look chubby at the start of the next season.

Still remember that game which he was a captain with poor performance
And he yelling at everyone for not cover his arse.

Ivanovic is not a leader.. 
A leader is one who leads by example. How can any of his fellow teammates respect anything he has to say in terms of leading the dressing room when they can all see he's making their lives harder and a shell of his former self. 
Not buying any justification for his extension. None. Can't believe he'll be starting games next season as well. 
What the hell is going on round Chelsea man? 

I don't see any chance that Pep will end up here.
From options that he has now, Man City,Man Utd and Chelsea
Why will he'll choose us?

What you're trying to interpret is like I said Jose had 0% power and control but I did not say this, so please don't make up things. I said, in order to succeed you must have full power and control (100%) of the transfers and targets. The world is not black or white, there are things in between. Not able to buy because the lack of money is one thing, but to have money to buy players and getting Djilobodji, Baba and Hector from Emenalo is another thing.
You're either a sheep that likes attention from the Emenalo cultists (your pic proves that), a Mourinho hater or a person with a very low IQ.
But your point to say the club spent 300M + on players suggests you're in the latest category too, so I suggest you should go back to school to learn the difference between gross spend and net spend, or maybe try to Google it.
But OK, I assume you're too lazy for that so I will explain it baby language for you:
The club spent (net) 52 millions in 5 windows. To compare: Arsenal 106M, City 178M, United 238M, Liverpool 99M.
So what does it say? It means in order to buy a player that manager wants, he has to sell another player for big value. But does it automatically mean that the manager didn't like the player that has to be sold? No, it means you have to choose between 2 valuable assets/options.
Nobody on here, can convince me or even themselves that Jose Mourinho didn't like David Luiz. Luiz played all the big games in midfield instead of Mikel, Oscar and Lampard in the second half of the 2013-14 season. So does it mean Jose didn't value him? No it means he had to sell him in order to buy other players that he wanted. Mata played more than Schurrle, KDB wanted to leave and Lukaku wanted a guarantee to be the first striker. He needed to sell these guys to get main targets like Diego, Cesc, Luis and Matic who won us the league.
But before you're going to say ''yeah but he clearly didn't like Mata, KDB, Luis and Lukaku, that's why the club sold them.'' I'd tell you, even if that was really the case that he didn't like them, and Jose had the 100% power and control of transfers, wouldn't he replace them with other Jose Mourinho type of players to add depth on the bench? Why aren't there any of Khedira, Higuain/Benteke, Sneijder, Callejon, Isco, Raul Garcia, Miranda, Luisao on our bench then?
But what is the reality? We still have the same bad quality depth, Mikel is still our first back up as CDM, Baba an unproven left back as our first back up. Djilobodji as our 4th center back, Ramires as our only box to box player, no top class striker to compete with Diego and Oscar as a starting player. And that's because the club was not 100% buying the players the manager wanted, and because they were reluctant to spend extra money.
Which big club in the world would sell your 2 times player of the year to a direct rival, in the middle of the season? Which big club waits 1 year long to get the ideal striker without getting a decent one now? Which big club has such bad bench options like ours? Which big club would ignore the pleads of the manager after winning the league? Which club would strengthen a direct rival with your club legend without strengthening yourself? Which club would be more busy with breaking records of players on loan rather than looking for quality for the first team? Which big club would get 0 first team additions after winning the league? Which club would get Djilobodji and Hector on deadline day to save your season? Which club would finish the deal of your only left footed left back option when the season is already 3 weeks old? Which big club uses a ''1 out first then 1 in'' transfer strategy? Which big club would be more busy with balancing the books than strengthening the squad?
The above piece summarizes the backing Jose got from the board and the ambition from the club. Yes Jose was not a victim that had 0% power and control but it was clear as day that he did not have 100% power and control. So please let your Cinderella stories rest that he was fully backed by the board in the 2,5 years here.
And no, this not an excuse for Mourinho to be sitting at 1 point above relegation. The club failed as a collective unit this season, including the players and Jose.

We've been linked with both Sampaoli and Simeone, but what strikes me as odd is they both have completely different footballing philosophies. Simeone is a 'win-at-all-cost' manger while Sampoali is an idealist, he wants his teams to play attacking football and to entertain the fans. In short, one is a Bilardismo (Simeone) "I learned competitive know-how from him (Bilardo) he is one of the managers who left his mark on me the most."
and the other is a Menottismo (Sampaoli)," I believe that the only way to succeed is by uniting players with a love of playing. You try to inspire in them a love of the shirt derived of enjoyment, not obligation. When you succeed in this individualistic society, it is by committing to something intangible, with humility. That allows everybody to come together; the social or cultural background of the people involved doesn’t matter."... How does Roman want Chelsea to play? if reports are to be believed he wants us to play attacking football while integrating youth, then it seems rather obvious to look for a manager that fits that profile, instead i bet we'll just hire any 'big name' manager who has a good CV completely disregarding whether they fit our needs.

I already mention this in another thread .
No top manager will happy to be a Chelsea manager if this Emanelo still in-charge about transfer
When you can't create your own men how the hell those men that you didn't pick will fit in your tactics?
It's Emanelo choose let him be our manager he know how to use them !!! lol

I'm sorry, I can't hold it in anymore, and this is in no way about the penalty today to but his performances since the start of the year: This guy is criminally overrated and for some reason always manages to avoid criticism and get afforded all the excuses in the world.
He had an excellent four month period at the start of last season but calling him the best defensive midfielder in Europe is akin to Liverpool fans labeling Joe Allen as one of the best midfielders in the world!

I already mention this in another thread .
No top manager will happy to be a Chelsea manager if this Emanelo still in-charge about transfer
When you can't create your own men how the hell those men that you didn't pick will fit in your tactics?
It's Emanelo choose let him be our manager he know how to use them !!! lol

I already mention this in another thread .
No top manager will happy to be a Chelsea manager if this Emanelo still in-charge about transfer
When you can't create your own men how the hell those men that you didn't pick will fit in your tactics?
It's Emanelo choose let him be our manager he know how to use them !!! lol

Chelsea transfer guru Michael Emenalo 'fighting for his job after disastrous start to season'
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/chelsea-transfer-guru-michael-emenalo-6807860

59 mins played 0 dribbling
No i didn't mean a success dribbling, It's 0 chance that he try to dribbling
This was a Legendary stats from any winger in the world ROFL
And still people doubt why he got subbed LOL