Henrique

It depends whats your concept of "far". Mourinho will never emulate SAF success and thats for sure, perhaps he will do better than LVG, but if Guardiola really comes to City next season I don't see United winning anything relevant in the next 3 years.

The headline doesn't reflect what Terry actually said. He basically said in football when things go wrong a club just don't sack all players, its easier and the rational thing to do to fire the manager when everything goes wrong.

Good words, but those people barely understand what football is. Jose will soon belong to past and they will find someone else to worship. These people are easy manipulated.

We do need more Emenalo avatars in this forum!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3367947/Chelsea-consider-Manchester-City-manager-Manuel-Pellegrini-long-term-replacement-Jose-Mourinho.html I'm surprised many people in the comment section believe Pellegrini would be a good option.

At the moment Barcelona are so fucking awesome that I can't understand why anyone would say possession football belongs to past. No doubt the old tik-taka is over, but Barcelona is not a tik-taka team anymore, and even Bayern is not a tik-taka team. As you said before, possesstion doesn't mean tik-taka. This Mourinho's side wasn't a counter-attack one, actually it was a team that for most part of the games had too much ball possession but just didn't know what to do with it, and was also, for most part, pretty bad in counter attacking, this is the reason why there were few occasions since 2013 that parking the bus paid off. Most games Jose opted for a ultra defensive approach, the team ended creating few to none counter attacking opportunities (that first leg against Atletico in 2014 UCL semi final).

"A shrine to Jose erected by Jose." Typical Jose. That article is perfect. I always saw Mourinho as a man with a insecurity personality, and thats the main reason why he is a ultra defensive coach. More important the game is, more afraid of losing he is, more defensive his teams become.

Why? He is only 62. Not really that old for a manager.

Wow, that picture will be Legendary.

Emenalo is missing, to make the Big 4.

Mourinho has friends and fans in british press, specially free lancers like Duncan Castles. He basically want to ridicule Emenalo there, because only a fool would believe Roman didn't decide himself Mourinho's fate and HE is the one who will choose the next manager, and to be honest its pretty foolish to imagine Emenalo decided himself Pellegrini would be the next manager and its even more absurd to imagine both sides already signed a pre-contract at this point, 3 days after Mourinho got the axe. Even for Castles standards that article is pretty embarrassing.

Yes, while playing mediocre football in Europe and facing relegation zone in his 3rd season in charge.

To be honest I still can't believe before the season started, almost every pundit said Chelsea had the strongest squad, and Mourinho would win the League again. Actually now that Jose is gone I realized he left a broken squad to his successor. I mean, most of his rejects are doing fine around, while somehow he went after Barcelona's rejects. I can't accept players like Fabregas and Pedro were not good enought to start games for Barcelona but arrived at Chelsea as essential players. It really makes me angry that Mourinho's is such a manipulator, that untill months ago everyone were sayin he was a fucking market genius for getting Fabregas and Costa using the money the club got for selling Mata, Luiz, KDB and Lukaku. Dont you think its pretty funny the same people who were praising those signings are the same people saying Costa and Fabregas are rats? Jose only got himself to blame here, just like Jose only got himself to blame for watching Lukaku scoring for fun for Everton, while his side were strugling to with Torres, Ba and Etoo, and he only got himself to blame for selling Luiz and favoring the mediocre Cahill, instead of teaching the mad man tactical discipline, he only got himself to blame for selling Mata and calling Oscar his number 10 but turning him into a pretty mediocre player. Mourinho won PL last season, if you want to give him all the credit, but he destroyed the team in the process.

Calm down mate.

You know United is broken into little pieces when almost half of their fans would accept Mourinho as the new manager. http://www.redcafe.net/threads/poll-added-would-you-want-jose-mourinho-as-the-next-manchester-united-manager.412540/page-24

Guardiola is a coward. He is afraid of the whole situation: rebuild a team that Mourinho left destroyed. He will choose, again, a pretty easy job and will manage a super stellar squad.

Giving him a temporary job is correct at this point, but if he do a good job, I dont ser any reason to find another man, unless he is Guardiola.

HAHAHAHAAHAH

United would be crazy if they get Mourinho. The man is not worth the trouble, and his best belongs to 5 or 6 years ago. If I was Mourinho I would leave Preamier League behind, specially if Guardiola is around next season, and perhaps Simeone. He will be fully exposed as a pretty outdated manager. I really hope he gets the Red's job, that will be another reason to stay in front of them next season.

how can a nobody say this kind of thing about Styles, a legend? Put youself in your place, mate.

If Hiddink + DD are a success in the short term, there is no reason to go for another manager next season, unless we are talking about Guardiola. Any other manager would too much of a risk in the moment the team must find stability again and introduce some new important players.

Wow, we have 114 users readind this topic, but 103 are guests.

Mikel was pretty good, to be honest.

Not sure why people are paying attention to chants. Untill days ago "Dieeego, Dieeego" was one of the most populars ones, despite his clownish performances and acts, and "Jose Mourinho" was pretty popular despite the team getting closer and closer of the relegation zone. That performance was really worrying, and Hiddink have a lot of job to do. In the first minutes looked like it was going to be a 8-0 performance, but specially in the 2nd half I got the feeling the team was pretty lucky to score early in the game. Lets not fool ourselves, Sunderlands is a 19th placed side and the amount of chances they had in the second half was really worrying. Even when the game was 3-1, you got the feeling the result was far from safe. Many old problems are still here: Costa was pretty bad. Pretty pretty bad. Fabregas put his usual boring performances (actually he is a boring player). The only player that was really on fire was Oscar, and that was eaily his best performance since 2013, but that was expected because Oscar and Hazard, from players who survived Mourinho's awful transfers strategies, are the ones who most suffered from the portuguese rigid tactics. Someone said on twitter that Oscar looked like and wild animal that is finally released after living years in a cage. The defense is still a joke. Sunderland created everything on Ivanovic's side. Zouma and Terry are unreliable. That was not a special performance, Oscar aside. Perhaps the vibe was more positive, but this team gave HUGE problems that are not easily explained by cheap things like: they didn't want to play for Jose.

I'm the only one who thinks didierforever is that guy who complains of everything? I mean, untill days ago he was big Mourinho critic and wanted the main sacked. As soon as he was sacked he started to complain about the players. This guy is pretty weird.