I never said that. I meant that if we want to maximise our attacking talent then we will look shaky at the back now and then. It's really just basic football ergonomics.
What do you want though? Do you want us to remain a solid defensive team that nicks goals here and there or do you want us to actually utilise the attacking talent in our squad? If it's the latter, you can't expect us to remain as solid as the back as last season...
Hmm I don't see that. Him and Ramires are alternating. You'll find Cesc fairly deep sometimes, and sometimes you'll find him forward. But of course in a 4-3-3 he'll have shared his defensive responsibility more so doesn't have to worry about his defensive game as much. Cesc was very average as an attacking midfielder against Everton if you don't remember. I wouldn't go as far as saying he's definitely better as a AM than at CM. It depends on the situation.
It's the start of the season, of course we're not going to be perfect ffs. If you haven't seen any promising signs you haven't been watching us at all.
Yeah, against teams that can play, like Swansea, I definitely agree with that. But against the lower half of the PL we should just play Cesc - Matic (and Matic needs to step his game up a bit).
People have been screaming for more attacking football but refuse to understand that that means we'll naturally be more vulnerable at the back. Some on here just don't understand the mechanics of football at all.
You're overreacting so much it's ridiculous. Sorry, what many flaws are there in the team? You do know we're facing a decent team here? This is ridiculous.