MoroccanBlue

We will go through 3 or 4 other managers and yet Alonso will still be our staring LB. Absolute mad. Zero sympathy from me now.

No worries lads. I'm sure we will get the Instagram posts of "Sorry guys, we will come back stronger next weekend!"

It's just so easy isn't it. So easy to defend against us and so easy to exploit us.

Lost some records against Conte too didn't we? Same group of players however....

Embarrassing that. Embarrassing.

Alonso's inability to take players own crippling our left side

Anyone else just fed up with Pedro?

That was the definition of a 'freak result', and from my account none of the goals were his fault.

Or he's got nudes of Sarri. Emerson must literally fuck about in training for Sarri to continue to pick Alonso.

On the plus side, at least Romero is starting. No Martial or Lingard either.

I haven't seen any post referring to CHO being a nailed on starter. Much like mine, it was the possibility of him being rested for tonight. There is no sympathy with Sarri on this matter. Not anymore.

Who said that?

People pretending Cahill is some influential figure and now people pretending this club cares about youth. Honestly.

Mourinho is a dead manager. His style, tactics, and way of managing is so outdated. PSG want attacking football and they know the baggage Mourinho brings.

Can't see PSG owners wanting him.

Bruno Fernandes and Sarabia are realistic possibilities. It's clear as day that this team lacks end product. If the board can't see that, it just gives more clarification they have fuck all idea what they are doing and should be petitioned out.

CHO starts I reckon the entire spirit of the club and fanbase will be lifted for this.

Much of an Ozil type player. Vastly inconsistent for my liking and there are better options we should pursue for that AMF role. As a winger, I'd rather we get Lozano.

Think the majority fear another Salah or KDB situation. Myself included.

When any mandate goes against the original US constitution, it's unconstitutional. The left want to change it whilst the right want to preserve it. I am speaking of the original US Constitution. When you create laws that go against it, like what Obama did, is unconstitutional. Just because it was passed by congress, doesn't mean it's constitutional. The founding fathers didn't believe in a country that distributed wealth equally to others. So when you create a law that takes people's money and distributes it to others, it's unconstitutional. I don't like socialism. What ever form. Because it deprives from the same basis. Distributing wealth. When 72% of Americans found Obama Care unconstitutional, yet it was still passed, shows the danger of government control. Just because we currently have socialist policies in place, doesn't mean we should go ahead and add more. That isn't an argument. You're right. In order for the USA to be prosperous, they need to follow suit like Norway, Finland, and Denmark. Conveniently forgetting the massive culture difference and the fact each country has less population than the state of Texas. I do to. Hence why I donate my money to charities I see fit. If you don't want your tax $$ to go to the military, than you should be fine with the logic of having your home invaded and no one there to protect you.

Extreme hypothetical there A. You shouldn't have kids if you can't afford them. B. You shouldn't have a mortgage if you can't afford it. (Thank god banks are more strict after the 2008 crises.) C. You shouldn't be working for a company that doesn't have workers comp. Which shouldn't be any as every business is required to have it in the States. So if I was working 2 jobs, had a mortgage, had 4 kids, got ill and worked for an employer that couldn't insure me if I got ill or injured, which all led to my house being foreclosed. I would say tough shit. No one's fault by my own. I shouldn't have planned my expenditures so naively and not plan ahead in case something like this would happen. Especially the situation I'm in. What led to that, is a mixture of very bad decisions. So we as Americans, should be forced against our will, to pay for those people's bad decisions? Do you not see the moral objection with that?

A. I want healthcare to become a free market. Not regulated. Affordable healthcare for those who can afford it. B. If you can't afford to send you child to college you shouldn't be having children. Not planning for your child's future is just bad parenting. I came to the states at 19, worked two jobs and put myself full time in a technical college. Not having that as an excuse. The opportunity is there. I'm not familiar with UK laws, but in the states, The original US constitution protects your individual rights. No one can seize your money and give it to someone else. It's an argument of morality.

President Obama and the Democratic party creating laws that go against the original US constitution, IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. I don't think you are getting it. AOC is meaning to create laws that go against the Constitution, just as Obama did in 2010. The fact you think that by merely changing the original US constitution, is OK, is worrying. Not only that, but it shows the dangers of Socialism. 72% of Americans say the healthcare mandate is unconstitutional. https://www.forbes.com/sites/merrillmatthews/2012/03/01/the-constitutional-issue-in-obamacare-isnt-cost-but-control/#10f311b6cef9 54% of Americans who think the healthcare mandate is a good thing, say its unconstitutional. https://www.forbes.com/sites/merrillmatthews/2012/03/01/the-constitutional-issue-in-obamacare-isnt-cost-but-control/#10f311b6cef9 And what did this mandate do? A mandate more than 70% of the country viewed as unconstitutional? Add 940 Billion in debt. The most debt out of any presidential policy. That is the issue with Socialism. It leads to economic decay. I await your response.