MoroccanBlue

Both Martial and Lingard might be unavailable. We rarely lose to United at home, let alone in the FA Cup. At this rate I am all for Willian taking that AMF role for the time being. Barkley and Kovacic just can't cut it.

Taking my money against my will for someone else's consumption, isn't against the constitution? I just showed you it does!

The 14th amendment of the Constitution. The right of the individual. The right to liberty and self government. "Every American has their right to control their own affairs, free of external government control." This is fundamentally the definition of our negative rights. AOC wants to have free tuition and free healthcare for all. How does she intend to do so? By taxing the wealthy 70%. So I am being forced against my own affairs, my own money, to give it to someone else who hasn't earned it. That exactly goes against the US Constitution. I want to give my money to roads, the police, and the military because I consume it. Public goods. I do not want to give my money to someone else for them to consume. Especially when I get no benefit. Unless I am willing to do so, that is just theft. I have so far countered all of your arguments and you have yet to prove to me why AOC isn't an imbecile. Yet apparently i'm embarrassing myself? You support the future of the democratic party who wants to spend nearly our entire budget for her proposals, and thinks the solution to fund all of this is to tax the wealthy and "print more money" If you must know, I am republican and didn't vote for Trump. In fact, I won't vote again next term unless Sasse runs against him.

The US Constitution was written to protect your individual rights. Not the rights of the collective. Every American has a constitutional right, that no one can force you to do something that goes against your negative rights. Me having to go to jail because I don't want to give someone money to go to college, goes against my negative rights. They are using my money for someone else's consumption. Against my will. So again, Socialism goes against the US Constitution. Me giving my money away for public goods, such as roads, police force, and military, isn't socialist. The USA wouldn't be the USA if it was founded on socialism. The founding fathers were smarter than that. Look at the destruction Marxist ideology has brought. A little bit of context would be beneficial here. Pro Tips: A. The United States would need the same economic competition as it was in the 1950's for this to work. So to suit this agenda, let's forget about a little country called China and lets pretend all of Europe and Japan are recovering after a world war. B. The government wasn't paying for Medicare and Medicaid C. Inflation. D. The baby boom drove massive spending on productivity. Still waiting to hear how it doesn't go against the constitution.

You don't have to be a Trump supporter to understand positive and negative rights. Rights that are given to us based on the declaration of independence.

I've already named one in the form of Alexandria Cortez. She wants to provide free tuition and free healthcare for all. How does she mean to do this? By raising tax rates nearly 70% on the wealthy. Taking their earned income and redistributing it to others. IE Socialism. Even that wouldn't be enough to fund it all. What's more concerning, is that she proposed banks to 'print more money'.... So again, tell me how this doesn't go against the US Constitution? I look forward to it. Haven't had a debate in ages.

1. Her socialist ideas go against the US Constitution. 2. She has been debunked on her statements regarding ICE, Unemployment, Medicaid, and how she will get the money to support her proposals. 3. Her Green New Deal is currently split between the Democratic party given it's unrealistic goals. The Republican Party won't ever consider it given the scrutiny behind it's proposal to pay those who don't want to work. They also don't buy into the notion it was 'doctored'. 4. She doesn't know how money works given if she had her way, there would be 4 trillion in new spending per year. Which equals the entire federal budget. She said all of which can be paid for without raising taxes. 5. Ben Shapiro has made her look like a tit. Inform me which of those points, in your words, is 'wrong on all counts".

First decent cross all season

She is, in every regard, an imbecile. She's been made a fool of countless of times and represents everything against the US Constitution. An embarrassment to the democratic party given her naivety and blatant inexperience. All of her statements she claims as facts, have been debunked in beautiful fashion. From Unemployment, Medicaid for all funding ,ICE, and how the money would be utilised to shift the United States into a socialist country. All of which scream nothing of rhetoric and have been appropriately fact checked. Ben Shapiro especially has made her look like a twat. What's worse, is the fact the democratic party is virtually split on her Green New Deal proposal given the scrutiny behind it (paying those that don't want to work) and it's unrealistic concepts defeating climate change. It's beautiful seeing even Democrats blast her nonsense. She doesn't know how money works. She really is a gift to the Republicans if she represents the future of the democratic party.

He did start against Spurs away. Just a thought. However, criticism will be justified if he doesn't start Monday.

Doesn't help that the democratic side has an imbecile in the form of Alexandria Ocasio Cortez representing them. Be interesting to see if Ben Sasse runs

Reminder that we all could look like dicks if CHO starts Monday. Also worth noting that the possibility of that is very slim.

Incoming the Lampard or Zola comments

Behave.

If CHO isn't starting against United Monday then I wouldn't hold anything against him to give this club the finger in the summer and fuck off.

Shameful starting XI Or, he starts against United? Who am I kidding. Absolute Joke he isn't starting.

Another Assist for Sarabia.

I wouldn't be opposed to have him another year or two.

Higuain Hazard--------------Pepe Sarabia----Kante Jorginho F.Mendy---Christensen---Rudiger---W.Bissaka Kepa

It's a midfield that is incredibly redundant. Jorginho is a holding midfielder. Kante is an aggressor, and Kovacic is good in possession. All three don't have end product. You can go on about Iniesta and Xavi not being goal scorers, however they were creators. The best on the planet. Kovacic needs to rotate with Jorginho and that AMF position needs to be a player with end product. Bruno Fernandes or Sarabia.

Ramsey is on 270. Not 400

Now this may be true, however. I can't see us continue that route. United are self sufficient. They can afford to sack manager after manager. We aren't and we have been heavily dependent on Roman. An owner who now looks completely disinterested and literally distant from the club. The fact he is letting this incompetent board run things for going on 2 seasons now, fills me with worry. With the market now inflated as ever, 70 million gets you one top player when 5 years ago it could get you three. No way we can continue to operate the way we have expecting the same results we did a decade ago.

Every time I watch Spurs in Europe, I just can't bring myself to believe that we lost 3 times in a row to this bunch.

Tidy dribbler

For those who watch him regularly, can he play on the left?