MoroccanBlue

Mourinho is a dead manager. His style, tactics, and way of managing is so outdated. PSG want attacking football and they know the baggage Mourinho brings.

Can't see PSG owners wanting him.

Bruno Fernandes and Sarabia are realistic possibilities. It's clear as day that this team lacks end product. If the board can't see that, it just gives more clarification they have fuck all idea what they are doing and should be petitioned out.

CHO starts I reckon the entire spirit of the club and fanbase will be lifted for this.

Much of an Ozil type player. Vastly inconsistent for my liking and there are better options we should pursue for that AMF role. As a winger, I'd rather we get Lozano.

Think the majority fear another Salah or KDB situation. Myself included.

When any mandate goes against the original US constitution, it's unconstitutional. The left want to change it whilst the right want to preserve it. I am speaking of the original US Constitution. When you create laws that go against it, like what Obama did, is unconstitutional. Just because it was passed by congress, doesn't mean it's constitutional. The founding fathers didn't believe in a country that distributed wealth equally to others. So when you create a law that takes people's money and distributes it to others, it's unconstitutional. I don't like socialism. What ever form. Because it deprives from the same basis. Distributing wealth. When 72% of Americans found Obama Care unconstitutional, yet it was still passed, shows the danger of government control. Just because we currently have socialist policies in place, doesn't mean we should go ahead and add more. That isn't an argument. You're right. In order for the USA to be prosperous, they need to follow suit like Norway, Finland, and Denmark. Conveniently forgetting the massive culture difference and the fact each country has less population than the state of Texas. I do to. Hence why I donate my money to charities I see fit. If you don't want your tax $$ to go to the military, than you should be fine with the logic of having your home invaded and no one there to protect you.

Extreme hypothetical there A. You shouldn't have kids if you can't afford them. B. You shouldn't have a mortgage if you can't afford it. (Thank god banks are more strict after the 2008 crises.) C. You shouldn't be working for a company that doesn't have workers comp. Which shouldn't be any as every business is required to have it in the States. So if I was working 2 jobs, had a mortgage, had 4 kids, got ill and worked for an employer that couldn't insure me if I got ill or injured, which all led to my house being foreclosed. I would say tough shit. No one's fault by my own. I shouldn't have planned my expenditures so naively and not plan ahead in case something like this would happen. Especially the situation I'm in. What led to that, is a mixture of very bad decisions. So we as Americans, should be forced against our will, to pay for those people's bad decisions? Do you not see the moral objection with that?

A. I want healthcare to become a free market. Not regulated. Affordable healthcare for those who can afford it. B. If you can't afford to send you child to college you shouldn't be having children. Not planning for your child's future is just bad parenting. I came to the states at 19, worked two jobs and put myself full time in a technical college. Not having that as an excuse. The opportunity is there. I'm not familiar with UK laws, but in the states, The original US constitution protects your individual rights. No one can seize your money and give it to someone else. It's an argument of morality.

President Obama and the Democratic party creating laws that go against the original US constitution, IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. I don't think you are getting it. AOC is meaning to create laws that go against the Constitution, just as Obama did in 2010. The fact you think that by merely changing the original US constitution, is OK, is worrying. Not only that, but it shows the dangers of Socialism. 72% of Americans say the healthcare mandate is unconstitutional. https://www.forbes.com/sites/merrillmatthews/2012/03/01/the-constitutional-issue-in-obamacare-isnt-cost-but-control/#10f311b6cef9 54% of Americans who think the healthcare mandate is a good thing, say its unconstitutional. https://www.forbes.com/sites/merrillmatthews/2012/03/01/the-constitutional-issue-in-obamacare-isnt-cost-but-control/#10f311b6cef9 And what did this mandate do? A mandate more than 70% of the country viewed as unconstitutional? Add 940 Billion in debt. The most debt out of any presidential policy. That is the issue with Socialism. It leads to economic decay. I await your response.

Have you not been reading what I've posted. I've brought this up three times now The 16th Amendment allows the federal government to collect income tax. Tax that goes directly to public roads and transport, military, and police force. These are considered public goods as these are goods we ALL consume. We ALL drive on the same roads. We ALL are protected by the police and we ALL are protected by our military. There is NOTHING in the constitution that states the government can seize my money, and give it to someone else for them to consume. That is down right theft. AOC means to tax me 70%, just so someone I don't even know can go to college for free. I honestly look forward to your hyped up response, because so far you haven't done anything to defend yourself nor counter my arguments appropriately.

That explains why Boateng has been playing second fiddle to Suarez

Only thing bizarre are people now pretending Cahill can influence this team all of a sudden.

The ones I've bolded are 19. That said, there are six 18 year olds in world football that have played more minutes than Odoi. Zola talking out of his arse there.

Yeah Zola's talking out of his arse there.

Sancho - 29 appearances Sessegnon - 25 appearances Vinicius Jr - 23 appearances Diop - 21 appearances Foden - 16 appearances Odoi - 9 appearances

I'm giving Sarri the benefit of the doubt on this one. Even he doesn't start CHO Monday, fully on board with the criticism.

Can someone look into this? Genuinely curious.

Need to mention they did spend 50 million on him. Again. If he doesn't start against United, there is justifiable reason to slate Sarri on this matter.

Yup. Confirmed. Both will be unavailable for games against us and Liverpool. Massive for us

No one is using it as an excuse. Even Sarri's biggest defenders can admit he lacks true game management. People reference Pep and Klopp, because look at what they accomplish when they do have their players. Especially the former. This season was never, ever, going to be an easy one. Too many players at our disposal used to conservative football and/or just technically inept.

They need a new ST given Munir is pretty average.

If he can start Spurs away, hardly implausible to accept the possibility he starts against United at home.

Another reason to not watch Serie A then, if true.

Let's not lose sight of the possibility he was rested for United. Slim chance. But still a possibility.