MoroccanBlue

Have you not been reading what I've posted. I've brought this up three times now The 16th Amendment allows the federal government to collect income tax. Tax that goes directly to public roads and transport, military, and police force. These are considered public goods as these are goods we ALL consume. We ALL drive on the same roads. We ALL are protected by the police and we ALL are protected by our military. There is NOTHING in the constitution that states the government can seize my money, and give it to someone else for them to consume. That is down right theft. AOC means to tax me 70%, just so someone I don't even know can go to college for free. I honestly look forward to your hyped up response, because so far you haven't done anything to defend yourself nor counter my arguments appropriately.

That explains why Boateng has been playing second fiddle to Suarez

Only thing bizarre are people now pretending Cahill can influence this team all of a sudden.

The ones I've bolded are 19. That said, there are six 18 year olds in world football that have played more minutes than Odoi. Zola talking out of his arse there.

Yeah Zola's talking out of his arse there.

Sancho - 29 appearances Sessegnon - 25 appearances Vinicius Jr - 23 appearances Diop - 21 appearances Foden - 16 appearances Odoi - 9 appearances

I'm giving Sarri the benefit of the doubt on this one. Even he doesn't start CHO Monday, fully on board with the criticism.

Can someone look into this? Genuinely curious.

Need to mention they did spend 50 million on him. Again. If he doesn't start against United, there is justifiable reason to slate Sarri on this matter.

Yup. Confirmed. Both will be unavailable for games against us and Liverpool. Massive for us

No one is using it as an excuse. Even Sarri's biggest defenders can admit he lacks true game management. People reference Pep and Klopp, because look at what they accomplish when they do have their players. Especially the former. This season was never, ever, going to be an easy one. Too many players at our disposal used to conservative football and/or just technically inept.

They need a new ST given Munir is pretty average.

If he can start Spurs away, hardly implausible to accept the possibility he starts against United at home.

Another reason to not watch Serie A then, if true.

Let's not lose sight of the possibility he was rested for United. Slim chance. But still a possibility.

Both Martial and Lingard might be unavailable. We rarely lose to United at home, let alone in the FA Cup. At this rate I am all for Willian taking that AMF role for the time being. Barkley and Kovacic just can't cut it.

Taking my money against my will for someone else's consumption, isn't against the constitution? I just showed you it does!

The 14th amendment of the Constitution. The right of the individual. The right to liberty and self government. "Every American has their right to control their own affairs, free of external government control." This is fundamentally the definition of our negative rights. AOC wants to have free tuition and free healthcare for all. How does she intend to do so? By taxing the wealthy 70%. So I am being forced against my own affairs, my own money, to give it to someone else who hasn't earned it. That exactly goes against the US Constitution. I want to give my money to roads, the police, and the military because I consume it. Public goods. I do not want to give my money to someone else for them to consume. Especially when I get no benefit. Unless I am willing to do so, that is just theft. I have so far countered all of your arguments and you have yet to prove to me why AOC isn't an imbecile. Yet apparently i'm embarrassing myself? You support the future of the democratic party who wants to spend nearly our entire budget for her proposals, and thinks the solution to fund all of this is to tax the wealthy and "print more money" If you must know, I am republican and didn't vote for Trump. In fact, I won't vote again next term unless Sasse runs against him.

The US Constitution was written to protect your individual rights. Not the rights of the collective. Every American has a constitutional right, that no one can force you to do something that goes against your negative rights. Me having to go to jail because I don't want to give someone money to go to college, goes against my negative rights. They are using my money for someone else's consumption. Against my will. So again, Socialism goes against the US Constitution. Me giving my money away for public goods, such as roads, police force, and military, isn't socialist. The USA wouldn't be the USA if it was founded on socialism. The founding fathers were smarter than that. Look at the destruction Marxist ideology has brought. A little bit of context would be beneficial here. Pro Tips: A. The United States would need the same economic competition as it was in the 1950's for this to work. So to suit this agenda, let's forget about a little country called China and lets pretend all of Europe and Japan are recovering after a world war. B. The government wasn't paying for Medicare and Medicaid C. Inflation. D. The baby boom drove massive spending on productivity. Still waiting to hear how it doesn't go against the constitution.

You don't have to be a Trump supporter to understand positive and negative rights. Rights that are given to us based on the declaration of independence.

I've already named one in the form of Alexandria Cortez. She wants to provide free tuition and free healthcare for all. How does she mean to do this? By raising tax rates nearly 70% on the wealthy. Taking their earned income and redistributing it to others. IE Socialism. Even that wouldn't be enough to fund it all. What's more concerning, is that she proposed banks to 'print more money'.... So again, tell me how this doesn't go against the US Constitution? I look forward to it. Haven't had a debate in ages.

1. Her socialist ideas go against the US Constitution. 2. She has been debunked on her statements regarding ICE, Unemployment, Medicaid, and how she will get the money to support her proposals. 3. Her Green New Deal is currently split between the Democratic party given it's unrealistic goals. The Republican Party won't ever consider it given the scrutiny behind it's proposal to pay those who don't want to work. They also don't buy into the notion it was 'doctored'. 4. She doesn't know how money works given if she had her way, there would be 4 trillion in new spending per year. Which equals the entire federal budget. She said all of which can be paid for without raising taxes. 5. Ben Shapiro has made her look like a tit. Inform me which of those points, in your words, is 'wrong on all counts".

First decent cross all season

She is, in every regard, an imbecile. She's been made a fool of countless of times and represents everything against the US Constitution. An embarrassment to the democratic party given her naivety and blatant inexperience. All of her statements she claims as facts, have been debunked in beautiful fashion. From Unemployment, Medicaid for all funding ,ICE, and how the money would be utilised to shift the United States into a socialist country. All of which scream nothing of rhetoric and have been appropriately fact checked. Ben Shapiro especially has made her look like a twat. What's worse, is the fact the democratic party is virtually split on her Green New Deal proposal given the scrutiny behind it (paying those that don't want to work) and it's unrealistic concepts defeating climate change. It's beautiful seeing even Democrats blast her nonsense. She doesn't know how money works. She really is a gift to the Republicans if she represents the future of the democratic party.

He did start against Spurs away. Just a thought. However, criticism will be justified if he doesn't start Monday.