Jump to content

Makelele - JT got Mourinho sacked


 Share

Recommended Posts

This is an interesting subject. I first heard of it when eldo mentioned in another thread. Sorry for bumping a 3 year old topic.

Recalling the departure of Mourinho two years ago, Makelele adds: ‘Rui [Faria] — our physical trainer — explained that a lot of players had complained about Mourinho, notably John Terry.’

http://www.dailymail...nho-sacked.html

Is it possible that Terry is the main culprit behind the downfall of the club? If the Makelele accusations are true, then he's partly responsible, but so is the board for giving in. And exactly the same thing repeated throughout the years, the latest victim being AVB, who seems to have been sacked under similar conditions - a few players make their disagreements public and reported arguments between them, and weeks later the manager gets fired. I see no reason why Claude would lie about such a thing... Reading his version of events, I'm sure that something along those lines did happen, you just don't make stuff like that up.

I'm gutted that in a few weeks I'm forced to doubt the 2 players who are the main reason why I started following Chelsea.

I believe it is within the player's rights to question the manager. After all, we all endeavour for the ultimate glory of the club, so I think the players should be allowed to voice their complaints without being criticised for doing so.

Do you still believe so? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/terry-denies-he-forced-mourinho-from-bridge-1693178.html

Jesus listen to yourself you bunch of gullible goons.

Do you really think Mourinho would publicly back JT various different times if this was the case?

The cynics and pessimists are really out for it lately. Cringeworthy. I can imagine other fans coming on here and laughing at us. Absolute embarrassment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will probably never know until Jose releases a proper autobiography but I do think there were some tensions behind the scenes between him and JT. I wouldn't be surprised at all if Jose wanted to drop him which led to the whole fiasco

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/terry-denies-he-forced-mourinho-from-bridge-1693178.html

Jesus listen to yourself you bunch of gullible goons.

Do you really think Mourinho would publicly back JT various different times if this was the case?

The cynics and pessimists are really out for it lately. Cringeworthy. I can imagine other fans coming on here and laughing at us. Absolute embarrassment.

How can you believe with certainty that JT had nothing to do with it? Jose has never come out and said it but he had nothing whatsoever to gain by doing so. We simply don't know in that case. Naive to believe one way or the other completely

Link to comment
Share on other sites

exactly, we don't know for fact, but we can discuss because there is basis for discussion (the whole point of the forum)... and if you have an opinion on it, fine, it's a constitutional right to have and express it.. but i won't be ridiculing everybody who has a different pov. and especially with the latest sacking, it looks similar to that case and is even more relevant now.

it is word against word... one has nothing to gain, the other would have everything to lose if he admitted to the accusations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted that two years ago.

And yes, I fucking do. What I don't expect is for them to completely humiliate the manager, the club and the fans.

I posted that two years ago.

And yes, I fucking do. What I don't expect is for them to completely humiliate the manager, the club and the fans.

I strongly believe that we have a very very powerful lobbyist group at Chelsea. They're the older players who pick and choose which manager is to their taste or not. Terry, Lampard, A.Cole and Cech is what I suspect, Drogba and Essien and a few others are neutral in my opinion. This lobby group have so much power and I suspect they are very close to Roman, if you look at Man utd their owners are hardly ever there and you can't tell me any of the players at City have Sheikh Mansour's telephone number...... they are completely detached from the club and I like it like that. You can see various photo's of the players on Roman's yacht and I don't like that. If you look at most companies and business's you will see the owner does not strike a close relationship with his employee's, its because there are sooooo many problems that can arise from that. First they will have a drink with you and slowly but surely they will get so close to you personally that any new Manager or supervisor that is employed is weaker then the company employee who is supposed to listen to the manager.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You