chrismada9 1,948 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 For which reason ? Just to prevent City to buy him ? Nah, we don't need him.Answer yourself this question then.... would you rather bust your gut over a ridiculously expensive 19 year old who sees another year at Santos........or would you spend a good £40m on a player who already has spoken good things about Chelsea and that he would love to learn and work with the likes of Drogs and Lamps?Neymar is optimistic, Agüero is probable... look at it in that sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bababoom 4,478 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Did You guys even watch La Liga ?Aguero is really inconstant. He is not even a starting player in Argentina NT.Not worth more than 20m or 22m.Not worth 20m?... come on you can not be serious. I'd much rather have Aguero than Neymar because he is proven and he is playing in a big league unlike Neymar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Not worth 20m?... come on you can not be serious. I'd much rather have Aguero than Neymar because he is proven and he is playing in a big league unlike Neymar.agree ...like aguero's attitude with Neymer you could be buying a bucketful of trouble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peace. 4,352 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 I agree. With Sturridge, Torres & Lukaku (supposedly) on the cards, signing Aguero is pointless.Yep, plus we still have Didier Drogba..Aguero is really inconstant. He is not even a starting player in Argentina NT.Agreed with you there. And he has weight problems.Answer yourself this question then.... would you rather bust your gut over a ridiculously expensive 19 year old who sees another year at Santos........or would you spend a good £40m on a player who already has spoken good things about Chelsea and that he would love to learn and work with the likes of Drogs and Lamps?Neymar is optimistic, Agüero is probable... look at it in that senseI'd rather buy Neymar over Aguero for the plain reason that we don't need another striker, let alone a £40m-striker.About the bolded part. Yeah, we have more chances to sign Aguero than Neymar, but I don't see the point to buy players just for the sake of buying players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rantdeville 195 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Neymar=robinho Aguero=tevezEither way you cut it, you're getting a talented player with an attitude, one didn't make it in the PL and the other is fighting to stay afloat in the PL. Something tells me were just picking our poisons with these fellas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peace. 4,352 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Neymar=robinho Aguero=tevezEither way you cut it, you're getting a talented player with an attitude, one didn't make it in the PL and the other is fighting to stay afloat in the PL. how did you work it out ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dodojojo 510 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Did You guys even watch La Liga ?Aguero is really inconstant. He is not even a starting player in Argentina NT.Not worth more than 20m or 22m.Same was said about Torres when he was at Atletico Madrid. And there are some mighty good players upfront in the ARG NT. Hard to sit Messi or Tevez down.I'm not saying Aguero is the right player for Chelsea and his price may indeed be inflated but I wouldn't dismiss his talent. And he's not like Tevez. Like Torres when he was at AM, Kun is known as a serious and mature professional.In general I support player movement, as a Torres fan, it would be hypocritical of me to not otherwise. But if I were a AM fan, I'd be pretty upset if Aguero left to join another team that's not even in European play. It's almost as bad as going to Real Madrid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrique 9,133 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Not worth 20m?... come on you can not be serious. I'd much rather have Aguero than Neymar because he is proven and he is playing in a big league unlike Neymar.Aguero is proven ? LMAOMate, Aguero never lived up with expectation. In SA Aguero, even in Argentina, people see Aguero as a player with potential but who never played as good as he should play.Thats why, despite all the talk about a move for a strong club in Europe, he is staying in Atletico, because you won't find any club willing to pay his asking price, 40m.Atletico paid 23m euros for Aguero, of course will only sell him for more than 30m euros. He never did anything special in Spain to even justify the money Atletico paid for a player who never played in Europe before, and now we are supposed to pay 40m euros ?Gimme a break. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue In Green 86 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Neymar=robinho Aguero=tevezEither way you cut it, you're getting a talented player with an attitude, one didn't make it in the PL and the other is fighting to stay afloat in the PL. Something tells me were just picking our poisons with these fellas.I assume this is a reference to Tevez, who single-handedly kept West Ham in the PL a few years back and hoisted a duct-taped Man City side into CL qualifiers. He may complain about his homesickness every now and then, but that never shows on the field. He looks fine to me out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrique 9,133 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Same was said about Torres when he was at Atletico Madrid. And there are some mighty good players upfront in the ARG NT. Hard to sit Messi or Tevez down.I'm not saying Aguero is the right player for Chelsea and his price may indeed be inflated but I wouldn't dismiss his talent. And he's not like Tevez. Like Torres when he was at AM, Kun is known as a serious and mature professional.In general I support player movement, as a Torres fan, it would be hypocritical of me to not otherwise. But if I were a AM fan, I'd be pretty upset if Aguero left to join another team that's not even in European play. It's almost as bad as going to Real Madrid.Torres went to Liverpool for 20m. Why we should pay more for Aguero ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warnie_666 1,081 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Torres went to Liverpool for 20m. Why we should pay more for Aguero ?That was 4 seasons back and there is something called as "inflated transfer market" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dodojojo 510 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Torres went to Liverpool for 20m. Why we should pay more for Aguero ?It was 20M plus Luis Garcia and I think the deal eventually topped out around 26M. Maybe AM realized how cheaply Torres went and don't want to be duped again? And not that I agree, but many consider Aguero to have had a better AM career than Torres did. The statistics certainly back it up. Finally, Torres went in 2007. The transfer market has changed a bit since then...Ronaldo, Kaka, Torres, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrique 9,133 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 But Agueros football did not changed.Not worth 40m. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 But Agueros football did not changed.Not worth 40m.YOU would say that ,,he is Argentinian ,,you hate them more than you hate the English ...just Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cosmin 2,484 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 There's no football player who worths 40m, in my honest opinion. The prices are way too big nowadays.25m pounds should be the highest price paid for a football player. But that's another story...About Aguerro...I don't know, I like him, but I just want to see Sturridge in the starting eleven next season, so... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bababoom 4,478 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Aguero is proven ? LMAOMate, Aguero never lived up with expectation. In SA Aguero, even in Argentina, people see Aguero as a player with potential but who never played as good as he should play.Thats why, despite all the talk about a move for a strong club in Europe, he is staying in Atletico, because you won't find any club willing to pay his asking price, 40m.Atletico paid 23m euros for Aguero, of course will only sell him for more than 30m euros. He never did anything special in Spain to even justify the money Atletico paid for a player who never played in Europe before, and now we are supposed to pay 40m euros ?Gimme a break.I think he is proven, his goal record in la liga is 102 goals in 234 games, i think that is very good, imagine what he can do when he is playing in an actual world class side.And no, i think the reason why he hasn't moved is because he wanted to stay loyal to Atletico. Also in my opinion i think he is more proven than Neymar. Neymar gets out muscled in the Brazilian league for god sake, imagine if he was playing in a decent league. It's funny because Lucas from Liverpool actually looked good in the Brazilian league, and in no way am i comparing Neymar to Lucas lol, but he might not be the potential world best player every one is making him out to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrique 9,133 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 There's no football player who worths 40m, in my honest opinion. The prices are way too big nowadays.25m pounds should be the highest price paid for a football player. But that's another story...About Aguerro...I don't know, I like him, but I just want to see Sturridge in the starting eleven next season, so...Messi is worth at least 150m. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrique 9,133 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 I think he is proven, his goal record in la liga is 102 goals in 234 games, i think that is very good, imagine what he can do when he is playing in an actual world class side.And no, i think the reason why he hasn't moved is because he wanted to stay loyal to Atletico. Also in my opinion i think he is more proven than Neymar. Neymar gets out muscled in the Brazilian league for god sake, imagine if he was playing in a decent league. It's funny because Lucas from Liverpool actually looked good in the Brazilian league, and in no way am i comparing Neymar to Lucas lol, but he might not be the potential world best player every one is making him out to be.Lucas never looked that good in brazilian league, actually. Nobody here said he was a "great player". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bababoom 4,478 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Lucas never looked that good in brazilian league, actually. Nobody here said he was a "great player".Mate, there are plenty of examples of the brazilian not making it in the prem, e.g Kleberson and Robinho.So am i right guessing you would rather us buy Neymar instead of Aguero? even though both these player most probably wont come. If you are saying Aguero is not proven, than Neymar is most definitely not. I dunno he might become one of the best players in the world, but im not that impressed with them wanting us to spend 40m on him. He gets knocked of the ball far too easy, he also losses the ball far too much, he dives ( and i know you said that south americans dont mind, but jesus if hes that good he shouldnt have to cheat), and lastly he has one of the worst attitudes in football, like when he never passed the ball to his team mates for the whole match. Talk about being a child. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DYC. 7,542 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Did You guys even watch La Liga ?Aguero is really inconstant. He is not even a starting player in Argentina NT.Not worth more than 20m or 22m.Haha him being incosistent in the past is absolutely normal. He just turned 23, 2 June, not every player can be like R9 or Messi (as in, consistently world-class at a very young age). Cristiano didn't become world-class until he was 23 and look at him now. Or what about Dinho and Zidane? And no I'm not saying Aguero will reach that level with all certainty, though he has all the talent to do so.And his goal-scoring record, see Terry07's post, is highly impressive for someone was 18-22 during that time, mostly playing as a second striker and not even playing for a world-class side.He was absolutely class last season, and that in a poor Atletico side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts