Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


J.F.
 Share

Recommended Posts

Aston Villa’s Jhon Duran hopes something comes of rumours linking him to ‘big teams’

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5655569/2024/07/24/jhon-duran-aston-villa-transfer-west-ham/

jhon-duran-scaled-e1721829385924-1024x68

Aston Villa striker Jhon Duran says he hopes something comes of rumours linking him to “big teams” this summer.

Duran has attracted interest from West Ham United, while fellow Premier League side Chelsea had been considering a move for the 20-year-old earlier this summer.

Villa are open to Duran leaving to enable them to strengthen in attacking positions.

“I take it very calmly with the help of my agent and my dad, we are taking everything little by little,” Duran said to ESPN Deportes when asked about the possibility of moving clubs.

“That my name is mentioned with such big teams, it is very important for my career. I’m happy that there are these rumours and let’s hope that something concrete happens.”

Duran joined Villa from MLS side Chicago Fire in January 2023. Since then, he has scored eight goals in 49 games for Villa.

Duran is on holiday following his participation in the Copa America with Colombia. He made one substitute appearance at the tournament as his country reached the final.

Villa have so far signed Amadou Onana, Ross Barkley, Ian Maatsen, Jaden Philogene, Lewis Dobbin, Enzo Barrenechea and Samuel Iling-Junior this summer. Douglas Luiz, Tim Iroegbunam, Morgan Sanson and Calum Chambers have all departed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Malang Sarr agrees Lens move after mutual termination of Chelsea contract

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5645583/2024/07/24/malang-sarr-Chelsea-transfer-lens/

GettyImages-1237824430-scaled-e172184574

Malang Sarr has agreed terms with Lens after Chelsea released him with a year left on his contract.

After the mutual termination of his Chelsea deal, Sarr will not receive a pay-off for the final year of his wages. His arrival at Lens is expected to be confirmed soon.

After joining Chelsea from Nice four years ago, Sarr spent the 2020-21 campaign on loan at Porto, playing 19 first-team matches, but returned to Chelsea for the following season — making 21 appearances across all competitions.

The defender made 22 appearances on a season-long loan spell at Monaco in 2022-23 and spent last season at Chelsea, but did not feature throughout the season under Mauricio Pochettino.

Sarr began his career at Nice, where he debuted as a 17-year-old and made 119 first-team appearances before joining Chelsea as a free agent.

The 25-year-old represented France up to Under-21 level but is also eligible to play for Senegal.

Five players have already left Stamford Bridge this summer with Ian Maatsen (Aston Villa), Lewis Hall (Newcastle United) and Omari Hutchinson (Ipswich Town) all sold, while Thiago Silva and Hakim Ziyech joined Fluminense and Galatasaray respectively on free transfers.

The club have signed defender Tosin Adarabioyo as a free agent from Fulham, while Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall, Omari Kellyman, Caleb Wiley, Renato Veiga and Marc Guiu have also been brought in.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, robsblubot said:

Heh, I'd actually say the same for the people who celebrate young (development) signings instead of silverware. To each his own, I guess. 🤷‍♂️

Haven't won the league since 2017, FA cup since 2018, league cup since 2015, yeah buying youth is clearly the problem....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, YorkshireBlue said:

Haven't won the league since 2017, FA cup since 2018, league cup since 2015, yeah buying youth is clearly the problem....

Love when people conveniently ignore the biggest silverware a club can win. 🤷‍♂️

For the record, I certainly don't. Like I said earlier, to each their own I guess.

Also, what is exactly *better* right now? You can argue that it's likely to get better in the future, but right now there is no competitive advantage from the time you complain about.

Edited by robsblubot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, robsblubot said:

Love when people conveniently ignore the biggest silverware a club can win. 🤷‍♂️

For the record, I certainly don't. Like I said earlier, to each their own I guess.

Also, what is exactly *better* right now? You can argue that it's likely to get better in the future, but right now there is no competitive advantage from the time you complain about.

Ok so we won a champions league in 2021, I'm talking about domestic league as we ain't even in the CL ATM, but what is better for me is we are going away from buying players past there prime or "absolute ballers from a farmers league" then going mental when they flop here. I also think the wage structure is better and the fact the club are trying to build a proper identity with the way we play, smash and grab stopped working for us properly years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Vesper said:

I dont give a tinker's what people think of me on this

IF Clownalke dump fucking 80 million euros on Samu, it is clear they are trying to sabo the club

This club is fucking finished at the top level and nobody can fucking tell me otherwise. 80m for a garbage player like Samu, are you fucking insane, anything over 10m is already a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, YorkshireBlue said:

Ok so we won a champions league in 2021, I'm talking about domestic league as we ain't even in the CL ATM, but what is better for me is we are going away from buying players past there prime or "absolute ballers from a farmers league" then going mental when they flop here. I also think the wage structure is better and the fact the club are trying to build a proper identity with the way we play, smash and grab stopped working for us properly years ago.

Mate we're fucking buying 2/3 shit talents, were going nowhere with this. Either buy real gems and develop them or this shit ain't gonna work. If we get Samu for big money we're fucking moronic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pizy said:

I listed Lavia because I think he’s going to be an amazing player for us in the long term.

I share your optimism about him. IF KDH earns minutes then I think Lavia might actually force a big name out of the side for spells.

Edited by OhForAGreavsie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

Fitness demonstration and a bit of hopeful shop-windowing?

Broja was also at the Euros too. Some of these squad choices are perplexing, especially if they are only attending the trip with the goal of being sold.

What happened to preseason being a time to evaluate those at your disposal and develop momentum?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, YorkshireBlue said:

Ok so we won a champions league in 2021, I'm talking about domestic league as we ain't even in the CL ATM, but what is better for me is we are going away from buying players past there prime or "absolute ballers from a farmers league" then going mental when they flop here. I also think the wage structure is better and the fact the club are trying to build a proper identity with the way we play, smash and grab stopped working for us properly years ago.

Fair enough, like I said, we all have our own preferences... this is entertainment after all.

Incidentally, I think the only over 30yo player who started that final against City was Thiago Silva, who was signed on a free deal. That was a pretty young side esp with Kai and Mount at 21-22.
The buys were Jorginho (well under 30 and still in his prime), and Kovacic who was 25-26 and very well in his prime. kante was 30, but obviously not acquired in that season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, TheHulk said:

Mate we're fucking buying 2/3 shit talents, were going nowhere with this. Either buy real gems and develop them or this shit ain't gonna work. If we get Samu for big money we're fucking moronic.

Buying youngster is a tactic for 3 or 4 seasons away not 1 or 2, we won't truly know if this works for atleast 2 or 3 more seasons. I don't agree with every buy but I definitely agree with the way we are going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, robsblubot said:

Fair enough, like I said, we all have our own preferences... this is entertainment after all.

Incidentally, I think the only over 30yo player who started that final against City was Thiago Silva, who was signed on a free deal. That was a pretty young side esp with Kai and Mount at 21-22.
The buys were Jorginho (well under 30 and still in his prime), and Kovacic who was 25-26 and very well in his prime. kante was 30, but obviously not acquired in that season.

Kai, people wanted him out, mount people wanted him out, jorginho for enough time people wanted him out, kovacic was a decent bench option at best, his goal ratio is shocking. This is what makes me laugh about the Trev situation, mount Gallagher CHO amount other people want/wanted gone, now all of a sudden we are ruining our youth system? If they are good enough they will break in, Trev isn't good enough and has had enough time here to show he never will, replacing him with younger players who might just turn out a hell of a lot better is a good call tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, YorkshireBlue said:

Buying youngster is a tactic for 3 or 4 seasons away not 1 or 2, we won't truly know if this works for atleast 2 or 3 more seasons. I don't agree with every buy but I definitely agree with the way we are going.

That we can agree on. With the caveat some of us think getting a couple of more experienced players, with renown, could actually help in the development of these younger players.

Now, the complicated part is "the bar." It's so freaking high here.
Say, take Jackson for a sec, he's a very good player in my book. I think he improved quite a bit and became more of a team player towards the end of the season. Now, maybe this is it for him -- this may be as good as he will ever get. If that's the case, is he good enough? maybe... maybe not. It's hard to say for sure, but I think the opposition would then have better options.
Of course, I hope he keeps on improving.

Just now, YorkshireBlue said:

Kai, people wanted him out, mount people wanted him out, jorginho for enough time people wanted him out, kovacic was a decent bench option at best, his goal ratio is shocking. This is what makes me laugh about the Trev situation, mount Gallagher CHO amount other people want/wanted gone, now all of a sudden we are ruining our youth system? If they are good enough they will break in, Trev isn't good enough and has had enough time here to show he never will, replacing him with younger players who might just turn out a hell of a lot better is a good call tbh.

Yeah I cannot comment on what other people wanted back then. Folks get upset for a number of different things.
I certainly did not want Kai and Mount out. Mount with a single leg shits on Mudryk IMO.

Disagree, Kova had a lot of important starts and performance. How about Enzo's or Caicedo's goal ratio? Trev has done shit tho. He's a good squad player, I agree, but that's about it.
So, I know that some people may think that the current team is better than the CL winner one. It makes no fucking sense in my mind tho. In the end though, it's all about achievements; if in a few of years this crop of players don't win anything, that's how they will be remembered.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, robsblubot said:

That we can agree on. With the caveat some of us think getting a couple of more experienced players, with renown, could actually help in the development of these younger players.

Now, the complicated part is "the bar." It's so freaking high here.
Say, take Jackson for a sec, he's a very good player in my book. I think he improved quite a bit and became more of a team player towards the end of the season. Now, maybe this is it for him -- this may be as good as he will ever get. If that's the case, is he good enough? maybe... maybe not. It's hard to say for sure, but I think the opposition would then have better options.
Of course, I hope he keeps on improving.

Yeah I cannot comment on what other people wanted back then. Folks get upset for a number of different things.
I certainly did not want Kai and Mount out. Mount with a single leg shits on Mudryk IMO.

Disagree, Kova had a lot of important starts and performance. How about Enzo's or Caicedo's goal ratio? Trev has done shit tho. He's a good squad player, I agree, but that's about it.
So, I know that some people may think that the current team is better than the CL winner one. It makes no fucking sense in my mind tho. In the end though, it's all about achievements; if in a few of years this crop of players don't win anything, that's how they will be remembered.

 

I don't think this team is as good as the CL winning team yet, but I believe with good coaching and a set way of playing instead of just throw the kitchen sink at it, this team has the potential to be alot better, agree with enzos goal ratio, I don't think Enzo is anywhere near worth the hype or the money especially what I've seen so far, hopefully he proves me wrong, and as far for caicedo if he takes on the destroyer role and gets more assists I don't mind how many goals he scores, kovacic for me did neither, good said player, very good dribbling ability but left me thinking is that it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...