Ben Chilwell

[NikkiCFC 8,286]

On 17/05/2021 at 20:22, Tomo said:

and he's a lot better defensively than I expected but attacking wise he's just as meh as I feared, the lack of aggression going forward compared to the two Scots to name two prime examples is stark and he doesn't seem to have any real working relationship with the players infront of him 

Goal or assist around every 300mins for a full back is very good I would say. He actually surprised me there.

And there is this: Chilwell played part in 7 open play goals this season in the league (goal or assist) in around 2300 mins. Mount 6 in around 2900 mins 💋

[OneMoSalah 8,883]

hace 1 hora, NikkiCFC dijo:

Goal or assist around every 300mins for a full back is very good I would say. He actually surprised me there.

And there is this: Chilwell played part in 7 open play goals this season in the league (goal or assist) in around 2300 mins. Mount 6 in around 2900 mins 💋

Only issue with Chilwell is his lack of aggressiveness/determination to make a real impact on the game in the final third compared to other fullbacks.

When he arrives in the final third he doesnt really do so with the aims of influencing the game in the same way that other fullbacks do hence why hes only got 5 PL assists in almost 2300 minutes. Although I suppose for a fullback thats maybe not the worst but there sure are times he is extremely frustrating. 

Think his last PL assist was v West Han a month ago. Then before that his last PL assist was in December v Villa. He only has 2 assist in half a season with Tuchel in all competitions which isn’t great. All in all, could be worse could be better in terms of his performances at times, the price tag always going to weigh down on him if he doesn’t up his level though and become a better player. I think mentally he isnt ever going to be driven enough to become the best or one of the best in his position though and that is worrying. 

[Jase 43,479]

From BBC:

Chelsea's Ben Chilwell registered his eighth goal involvement in the Premier League this season (3 goals, 5 assists) - among defenders, only Trent Alexander-Arnold has been involved in more (9).

[Jase 43,479]

3 hours ago, OneMoSalah said:

When he arrives in the final third he doesnt really do so with the aims of influencing the game in the same way that other fullbacks do hence why hes only got 5 PL assists in almost 2300 minutes.

In terms of full backs, only 4 players have more assists than Chilwell in the league this season:

Robertson - 7 (3,386 mins)

TAA - 7 (2,997 mins)

Digne - 6 (2,232 mins)

Coufal - 6 (2,605 mins)

Shaw also has 5 assists from 2,604 mins played. 

[Superblue 6,372]

5 hours ago, OneMoSalah said:

Only issue with Chilwell is his lack of aggressiveness/determination to make a real impact on the game in the final third compared to other fullbacks.

When he arrives in the final third he doesnt really do so with the aims of influencing the game in the same way that other fullbacks do hence why hes only got 5 PL assists in almost 2300 minutes. Although I suppose for a fullback thats maybe not the worst but there sure are times he is extremely frustrating. 

Think his last PL assist was v West Han a month ago. Then before that his last PL assist was in December v Villa. He only has 2 assist in half a season with Tuchel in all competitions which isn’t great. All in all, could be worse could be better in terms of his performances at times, the price tag always going to weigh down on him if he doesn’t up his level though and become a better player. I think mentally he isnt ever going to be driven enough to become the best or one of the best in his position though and that is worrying. 

It's a strange one because I do think Chilwell has the aggressiveness and determination to get into the final third on a regular basis and I do think if there is space available he attacks it. When the space isn't there, I'd agree there's question marks of whether he can do more but then is the problem more related to the personnel on the pitch?

If we have a front three for example of Mount, Pulisic and Werner then Chilwell is just going to get ridiculed for trying to regularly cross the ball. The wing backs role under Tuchel may be to do what Chilwell is doing, i.e. provide the width to try and pull defenders out and then recycle the ball to hopefully exploit spaces. I agree though at times he needs to move the ball quicker, especially against a deep defence but like others have said he isn't the only one guilty of this.

I've been fairly pleased with his contributions this season. He went through a mid season slump but he's definitely come out of it better and more battle hardened. There are certainly far more pressing areas of the squad we need to worry about than his position.

I still think he's better suited as a left back than a wing back though, but I also think the same of James. 

[Beigl 1,387]

Great game from him. Really good touch from him in the build-up to the goal. 

[Vesper 30,081]

It would be a strange waste of Chilwell’s talent if he spends Euro 2020 on the sidelines

https://theathletic.com/2650396/2021/06/15/strange-waste-chilwell-talent-euro-2020-sidelines-england/

Not many players have experienced a greater contrast of emotions in the space of two weeks than Ben Chilwell.

On May 29, he enjoyed the finest moment of his professional career, starting, playing well and going the full 90 minutes in Chelsea’s 1-0 victory over Manchester City in the Champions League final.

The quality of his performance, one of many for Chelsea in the latter stages of the campaign, seemed perfectly timed with a left-back berth to fight for ahead of England’s looming European Championship campaign.

Former Chelsea manager Jose Mourinho certainly thought the place was his during the build-up, saying: “I would go with Ben Chilwell, I wouldn’t think twice. He is intelligent, he covers the space, the diagonals inside very well, he is dangerous in attack, he is good in the air, good on set pieces. Chilwell has something more.”

However, on the eve of the opening game against Croatia on Sunday and just a fortnight after lifting the European Cup, Chilwell was not only told he wasn’t in the first XI but would have to handle the ignominy of being one of the three players in the final 26 left out of the match-day squad by manager Gareth Southgate. One of the other two was Harry Maguire, who is injured.

 

Chilwell and Harry Maguire, who missed out on a place in the squad against Croatia through injury (Photo: Robin Jones/Getty Images)

What made the decision all the more surprising was that the starting left-back was given to right-back Kieran Trippier, with the other left-back in the squad, Luke Shaw of Manchester United, named on the bench.

Given England kept a clean sheet in securing their first-ever win in an opening game at a European Championship, one can’t see Southgate demoting Trippier any time soon.

After the 1-0 triumph at Wembley, the manager was full of praise for the Atletico Madrid defender, saying: “We felt that his talking across the back line and his ability to get out and stop crosses quickly and his experience — alongside (centre-back) Tyrone Mings, who is relatively early in his international career — would be a good stabilising element.

“He is a very underrated player. People are still looking at the player from a few years ago (when Trippier was at Tottenham Hotspur) and not at the one who is at Atletico Madrid and playing like a warrior in the last few seasons. He is a big part of what we’ve done over the last few years and he gave a really good performance.”

How has Chilwell reacted to the snub? Positively, by all accounts. It helps that he was in a similar situation earlier this year at Chelsea, following the January arrival of Thomas Tuchel to replace Frank Lampard as head coach.

Tuchel started Marcos Alonso rather than the England international in six of his first eight matches in charge. Chilwell was an unused sub on each occasion. With the new coach favouring a formation with wing-backs, a role that even Chilwell initially conceded suited Alonso more, it would have been understandable if he’d been more than a little concerned about his future at a club he only joined last August.

But the 24-year-old focused on working hard and improving in training. As The Athletic explained in March, Chilwell didn’t complain to Tuchel or look to make a fuss. He acted like a professional rather than becoming a negative influence in the camp.

Chilwell steadily won Tuchel over with the standard of his performances to the point he was unquestionably the first choice by the end of the domestic season, although he had the setback of being only used as a substitute in the FA Cup final defeat a month ago against Leicester City, his previous club.

It is one of the few decisions he’s made since January that Tuchel is believed to have privately accepted he got wrong.

 

Chilwell has become an integral part of Tuchel’s plans at Chelsea (Photo: Darren Walsh/Chelsea FC via Getty Images)

The early indications are that Chilwell has reacted to the England disappointment in the same way as he did to those early omissions under Tuchel.

Further signs of that are the videos he posted on his Instagram account on the journey back to England’s base at St George’s Park from Wembley on Sunday, laughing and joking with Arsenal’s Bukayo Saka. But that isn’t a sign he is resigned to his fate; he will still, rightfully, hope to play in this tournament.

Inevitably, Southgate was very upbeat following the win over the 2018 World Cup runners-up, saying he was as happy with the manner of the performance as the result itself. Beating the second seeds in Group D is obviously a reason to be positive but he shouldn’t be blind to aspects of the game that could have been done better.

England’s attack only sparked for 15 minutes in the first half and then on a few isolated occasions, including Sterling’s winner, in the second. The statistics show Croatia had the same number of shots in total (eight) and one fewer effort on target (one) as they did.

One of the reasons for this lack of threat in the final third was the lack of adventure from the full-back positions.

 

According to Sky Sports, Trippier and Kyle Walker, who was picked on the right, had just five touches (one of those was a throw-in) between them on the flanks to the left and right of the Croatia penalty area. Walker attempted just two crosses throughout the 90 minutes, neither of which found a team-mate, Trippier didn’t even try a centre into the box.

Trippier’s ability to take a long throw-in is a useful asset — it worked to great effect in the move which led to Phil Foden hitting a post early on. His ability to take a set piece was also a factor in Southgate’s mind, although the one from which Trippier tried to score on Sunday was comfortably blocked by the wall.

One suspects England’s other two group opponents, Scotland on Friday followed four days later by the Czech Republic — who beat the Scots 2-0 on Monday — will have even more conservative game plans and look to hit them on the counter. The need for full-backs to get forward will be greater and, ideally, Southgate’s side want a left-back who can cross with his left foot. Trippier’s natural preference to cut back onto his favoured right is going to be a hindrance as it leaves the side unbalanced.

This should provide Chilwell, and Shaw for that matter, reasons to stay optimistic about playing a part in this campaign.

It would be a strange waste of the former’s talents if he spends the whole of Euro 2020 watching from the sidelines.

Edited June 15, 2021 by Vesper

[King Kante 1,643]

On 24/05/2021 at 03:10, NikkiCFC said:

Goal or assist around every 300mins for a full back is very good I would say. He actually surprised me there.

And there is this: Chilwell played part in 7 open play goals this season in the league (goal or assist) in around 2300 mins. Mount 6 in around 2900 mins 💋

So, a similar figure to what Alonso, the Talk Chelsea whipping boy, was putting up, as an average, prior to this season? 

[Superblue 6,372]

12 minutes ago, King Kante said:

So, a similar figure to what Alonso, the Talk Chelsea whipping boy, was putting up, as an average, prior to this season? 

If anything that has been the argument for why Alonso has remained a useful squad depth option over this time.

The biggest problem with Alonso is his pace and defensive positioning, awareness, ability, etc. Chilwell is miles ahead of him defensively.

[King Kante 1,643]

21 minutes ago, Superblue_1986 said:

If anything that has been the argument for why Alonso has remained a useful squad depth option over this time.

The biggest problem with Alonso is his pace and defensive positioning, awareness, ability, etc. Chilwell is miles ahead of him defensively.

Not sure what you mean about ability, as his left foot is the best one we have at the club. Additionally, his defensive positioning is largely to do with his pace (which is an issue) and how he gets told to get into the box as an attacking option. You give Alonso pace and virtually every criticism about him goes away. 

Anyhow, my point is those figures Nikki put up aren't really any different to those Alonso put up in his first four seasons and Chilwell also has a serious flaw in that he cannot use his right foot properly. That means our attacks break down a lot as he will just play a safe pass backwards whenever he has it played to that foot. 

[NikkiCFC 8,286]

But the thing is... Those are good numbers from both for LWB position. Much bigger problem is other side and Reece and this is why we are after Hakimi.

[Superblue 6,372]

1 hour ago, King Kante said:

Not sure what you mean about ability, as his left foot is the best one we have at the club. Additionally, his defensive positioning is largely to do with his pace (which is an issue) and how he gets told to get into the box as an attacking option. You give Alonso pace and virtually every criticism about him goes away. 

Anyhow, my point is those figures Nikki put up aren't really any different to those Alonso put up in his first four seasons and Chilwell also has a serious flaw in that he cannot use his right foot properly. That means our attacks break down a lot as he will just play a safe pass backwards whenever he has it played to that foot. 

Purely talking about defensive ability. It's not just his pace, but he's always been a lazy defender. He's hardly the most willing to track back once he's ventured forward and in general his defensive awareness and positioning is just not a very good standard. 

As a backup option at wing back he's serviceable (his pace and work rate are still a hindrance but at least he's covered a little more defensively) and if we're keeping the wing back system next season then there will be a potential role in the squad for him as back up to Chilwell but as a full back he's a complete liability.

I agree that there are aspects to Chilwell's game going forward (how anyone who plays professionally is only comfortable with one foot is beyond me. I only ever played county level as a kid, and 6 a side as an adult and I practised with my weaker right foot until I was comfortable on either side with either foot. At professional level any player should be capable of at least passing within 20 yards and shooting/crossing with both feet). However if his attacking stats are similar to Alonso and he's a huge upgrade defensively, he's a definite first choice from what we currently have in the squad.