Timo Werner

[NikkiCFC 8,001]

3 hours ago, MoroccanBlue said:

No idea. I'd rather sell players to Bayern over Dortmund after the Haaland fiasco. 

Nothing to do with Dortmund tho. Once Raiola asked for his numbers it never came to speaking with Dortmund. 

[Warning_Hazard 156]

Played well today and got an assist.

[Supermonkey 38]

Should be given chances in the big games. Play him against City I say, to keep their back line busy from pushing high. He fucked them up in the FA semi final and CL with his movement. I bet he gives Lukaku space too. 

[Magic Lamps 11,664]

should obviously have scored but you still can see how his pace and runs opens up teams. Even if he always misses his shots, opposition teams can not simply let him run and hope for the best, so if we use him wisely, his runs and lukaku's power can cause a lot of havoc.

[MoroccanBlue 5,314]

Thought both were a pair of donkeys yesterday playing with each other. 

[Warning_Hazard 156]

Oh look you bunch of cry babys, Had a great night didnt he!!??

pfft!!

[Vesper 28,934]

On 16/09/2021 at 15:31, ZAPHOD2319 said:

Has Dortmund ever payed a large fee for a player?

Edited September 23, 2021 by Vesper

[ZAPHOD2319 4,506]

I think it would take paying at least 50M pounds to get him. That is pretty high past their record signing. I think Bayern is a possibility as he and Naglesmann still have a close relationship. They still talk, some say weekly.

[Magic Lamps 11,664]

Sad thing, despite his well-taken goal, he still looks not even a bit more confident than he did before. Really need him to bring his A-game to unlock City. They will be out to take revenge.

[NikkiCFC 8,001]

5 subs, no Mount and Pulisic. Lukaku, Kai and Hakim were shocking and he did not play a second? WTF?!

[manpe 10,861]

19 hours ago, NikkiCFC said:

5 subs, no Mount and Pulisic. Lukaku, Kai and Hakim were shocking and he did not play a second? WTF?!

Brought on RLC and Barkley instead ffs, what was the point of Ross especially? He was clueless and good for nothing other than holding onto the ball for too long and making easy passes. We had nobody making runs in behind which Werner could have done, instead we kept on passing between our 4 midfielders and defenders until the ball was hoofed to Lukaku and lost. 🤔 Some baffling decisions there.

[OneMoSalah 8,781]

He is one who I think is as good as done here barring a miracle. The big thing being TT talked about not having runs or runners v Juventus but yet he didn’t sub him on. The proof is in the pudding, why didn’t he bring him in? Does he trust him? Does he not? 

Edited October 1, 2021 by OneMoSalah

[Warning_Hazard 156]

2 hours ago, OneMoSalah said:

He is one who I think is as good as done here barring a miracle. The big thing being TT talked about not having runs or runners v Juventus but yet he didn’t sub him on. The proof is in the pudding, why didn’t he bring him in? Does he trust him? Does he not? 

Defending lukaku and writing off werner when werner has played better in the last couple of games looks pretty silly tbh

Edited October 1, 2021 by Warning_Hazard

[OneMoSalah 8,781]

36 minutes ago, Warning_Hazard said:

Defending lukaku and writing off werner when werner has played better in the last couple of games looks pretty silly tbh

The point is why hasnt Tuchel started him once in the PL since Lukaku came in though? Or even bringing him on v Juve then talking about missing runners or runs in behind post match? 

If he had faith in Werner surely he would of played him more than 209 minutes in the PL so far? No? Or subbed him in v Juve? 

Not one mention of Lukaku in that post either but guessing you mean one from Another thread.

Edited October 1, 2021 by OneMoSalah

[ZAPHOD2319 4,506]

 

[Warning_Hazard 156]

1 hour ago, OneMoSalah said:

The point is why hasnt Tuchel started him once in the PL since Lukaku came in though? Or even bringing him on v Juve then talking about missing runners or runs in behind post match? 

If he had faith in Werner surely he would of played him more than 209 minutes in the PL so far? No? Or subbed him in v Juve? 

Not one mention of Lukaku in that post either but guessing you mean one from Another thread.

Because lukaku at £97M is probably undroppable as hes the only out and out finisher weve got!?

Werner cost £30M and no doubt does need more goals but comparing them is like comparing kante to rudigar lol?

 

[LAM09 6,762]

5 hours ago, Warning_Hazard said:

Because lukaku at £97M is probably undroppable as hes the only out and out finisher weve got!?

Werner cost £30M and no doubt does need more goals but comparing them is like comparing kante to rudigar lol?

 

Werner cost just short of £50m - Timo Werner - Player profile 21/22 | Transfermarkt

Also, price shouldn't have a notable impact on selection. Pick the best players for the job.

[Jase 43,479]

15 hours ago, OneMoSalah said:

The point is why hasnt Tuchel started him once in the PL since Lukaku came in though?

Only one so far but they started together just last weekend.

15 hours ago, OneMoSalah said:

Or even bringing him on v Juve then talking about missing runners or runs in behind post match? 

If he had faith in Werner surely he would of played him more than 209 minutes in the PL so far? No? Or subbed him in v Juve? 

Am surprised no one mentioned the whole deep defences against Werner thing!

Tuchel explained last week on why Werner hasn't played much. Now, whether you want to believe his comments then, it's up to you or whether he's just talking shit...god knows at this point.