OhForAGreavsie 6,075 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 1 minute ago, Costa19 said: Actually signing Pato would make some kind of sens. We have been chasing Greizmann according to reports and Pato is pretty similar to him. Both can play ut wide, both can play behind the CF. Pato have good feets, good shots and he still got pace. But knowing our luck he will end up beeing a big fecking flopp. Pato would be a flop and it would have nothing to do with luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,075 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 47 minutes ago, azinopik said: Pato is another Oscar I'd rather have Oscar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,075 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 On 12/12/2015 at 9:01 PM, Rmpr said: Pato arrived to Corinthians 2,5 years ago from Milan as the biggest transfer in Brazilian history (a little more than 10 million euros at the time) but he didnt fit their manager's system and he was always accused of being lazy or not caring enough. This is just the equivalent of the Oscar is tired nonsense. It's the sort of thing people say when they either do not want to be frank about a player because they are trying to sell him or else they are not prepared to accept the truth. The truth is that, Pato is useless. Stupid signing if it happens. P.S. Just to answer the rather reasonable question some may want to ask, I have not seen Pato kick a ball in Brazil. I did see him play for Milan however. His reputation is all smoke and mirrors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essien19 1,415 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Since when did we become a gathering place for failed existences? Will we ever learn? But that's just the way it is, i will give this boy a chance, let's find out if he's better than Traore, Kenedy, Remy, Falcao and others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 On 23 August 2015 at 11:54 AM, The Skipper said: Pato > Falcao. Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Juan 28,141 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Me>Pato>Falcao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 7 minutes ago, Special Juan said: Me>Pato>Falcao Sign Mark up! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,585 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 I rather get Chicharito then this guy. But if we get him then if the wages and fees is low then that's a low risk gamble. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chelsea Legend 11 4,062 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Pato for peanuts is at least a sign that the club are biding their time before they go big in the summer. Pato is basically replacing Falcao in the pecking order, and while I'm not elated, I do like the fact that its a low risk high reward type deal. 50k a week is nothing. From the videos I've seen his explosiveness looks to be back, he does have tidy feet and is a willing passer. Â We live to fight another day by not committing big dollars before we get our manager. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the wes 7,212 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016  If we do sign pato don't let him hit penalties Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leif 6,006 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 me and the board do the same drugs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the wes 7,212 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Sometimes a washed up player can surprise u I remember we signed a washed up George Weah and he help us win the FA Cup and did a good job for us Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChelseaFanUK 1,014 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Being reported in Lance! now too. Â No idea if they're reliable, they also say Kia Joorabchian is doing the deal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robsblubot 3,595 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 his story - injuries slowly chipping away his blazing pace - is scaringly similar to Torres'... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike 12,049 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 2 hours ago, Fernando said: I rather get Chicharito then this guy. But if we get him then if the wages and fees is low then that's a low risk gamble.  2 hours ago, Chelsea Legend 11 said: Pato for peanuts is at least a sign that the club are biding their time before they go big in the summer. Pato is basically replacing Falcao in the pecking order, and while I'm not elated, I do like the fact that its a low risk high reward type deal. 50k a week is nothing. From the videos I've seen his explosiveness looks to be back, he does have tidy feet and is a willing passer.  We live to fight another day by not committing big dollars before we get our manager. He isn't a striker primarily. Only on FIFA is he a centre forward. He is a  wide forward, usually on the left.  http://www.whoscored.com/Players/23158 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chelsea Legend 11 4,062 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Just now, Spike said:  He isn't a striker primarily. Only on FIFA is he a centre forward. He is a  wide forward, usually on the left.  http://www.whoscored.com/Players/23158 No I get that for sure, he's played most of his games on the left. This is precisely why I think we're interested because of his ability to play in different roles. More of an Auxiliary striker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chelsea4 1,521 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Pato could be a good signing.  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sideshow Luiz 2,310 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 35 minutes ago, Chelsea4 said: Pato could be a good signing.  Could be.  But, if he's primarily an aux striker who can play out on the left, 433 would suit him better.  Same with Pedro.  Not so much LM like we use. I'd love for us to give 433 a shot, but... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrique 9,133 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 http://espn.uol.com.br/noticia/570253_agora-com-pato-na-mira-chelsea-e-um-verdadeiro-cemiterio-de-atacantes According to ESPN Brasil correspondent based in UK, he believes Pato's staff is creating the whole thing and he doesn't believe Chelsea is really interested, and only a deal on loan would be possible. I hope its true. Pato doesn't many any sense. Team with Oscar+Pato. What a nightmare. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sideshow Luiz 2,310 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 7 minutes ago, Henrique said: http://espn.uol.com.br/noticia/570253_agora-com-pato-na-mira-chelsea-e-um-verdadeiro-cemiterio-de-atacantes According to ESPN Brasil correspondent based in UK, he believes Pato's staff is creating the whole thing and he doesn't believe Chelsea is really interested, and only a deal on loan would be possible. I hope its true. Pato doesn't many any sense. Team with Oscar+Pato. What a nightmare. The google translate version of that link is great: Now with duck in the sights, Chelsea is a true 'cemetery attackers' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.