A New Technical Director

[Ossie the King 634]

3 minutes ago, The Skipper said:

 

We've already had a similar discussion on this, CL11 just reinforced exactly what I was telling you. 

 

He made some excellent points didn't he? 

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

8 hours ago, Ossie the King said:

For us that has been Jose, but going forward I don't see a coach being given time to do that (especially not like Fergie or Wenger were) so I think we have to be realistic and look outside of that role. 

 

I think it was a combination of a core of experienced players making one unbelievable last push (the core assembled and moulded by Jose in his time here) and huge strokes of luck. We were not the best team in Europe that year, we weren't even the best in London arguably, but the stars aligned and everything went our way. That's not to dismiss the win but to look at it in context and acknowledge (again) the reality the what happened.

 

I think De Bruyne went for about £10 million less than that but I get your point that part of his remit is to by appreciating assets for us to either sell or incorporate into the team in the future. With our scouting network and vast resources, I think that is possibly one of the easiest jobs in world football but that's neither here nor there. What I believe the role should expand to include is a greater influence on the footballing side so that you have some cohesion between the man who has great responsibility in acquiring players and is also the long-term stable presence that a coach is unlikely to be.

Anyway, enjoyed the chat and it's clear to see we differ in our views but you engaged anyway. You weren't just a yappy little dog on the sidelines but actually got involved and I have to respect that. Cheers mate.

I do tend to agree that there is no place in the modern game for a legacy coach anymore. We won't see one guy at a club for 10-15 yrs but I don't think it'll take that long to establish a style and philosophy. Look at Atletico Madrid for example, or to a lesser extent Mark Hughes at Stoke. Clearly in both instances the coach has revolutionized the style of football being at each club. If we get a coach signed and allow him to live out the duration of his contract (even one term) we will have the makings of a philosophy to build on. Frankly I think our guy is Simeone only because he is the closest thing out there to Jose... If we give him limitless funds he can build a team in his image and perhaps redefine Mourinho's legacy in the way Guardiola did for Cruyff. Just my opinion, we don't play like Barca, the hallmark of our golden era was founded on hard work, power and discipline... all the things that seem to be me missing right now. 

The team was miles different post AVB and the record would've been different had we not transformed from a league team(for lack of a better term) to a cup team, don't forget we also won the FA Cup that year. It was clear to me when I watched them play the league form was sacrificed for the cup runs... At any rate you can view it any way you like, we won it and yes Emenalo had a role.

De Bruyne had a sell on fee worked into his contract so when he went to City we got extra money from the sale.

[Ossie the King 634]

3 minutes ago, Chelsea Legend 11 said:

If we get a coach signed and allow him to live out the duration of his contract (even one term) we will have the makings of a philosophy to build on. Frankly I think our guy is Simeone only because he is the closest thing out there to Jose... If we give him limitless funds he can build a team in his image and perhaps redefine Mourinho's legacy in the way Guardiola did for Cruyff. Just my opinion, we don't play like Barca, the hallmark of our golden era was founded on hard work, power and discipline... all the things that seem to be me missing right now. 

 

Couldn't agree more. I don't want us to be Barca either. I like us to be the anti-Barca, the team that steamrolls over the Arsenals and Barcelona's of this world and we absolutely are missing those aspects from our game.

[Fulham Broadway 17,332]

17 minutes ago, Ossie the King said:

 

Couldn't agree more. I don't want us to be Barca either. I like us to be the anti-Barca, the team that steamrolls over the Arsenals and Barcelona's of this world and we absolutely are missing those aspects from our game.

Yup, that was Joses philosophy apparently according to wee Pat after his acrimonious departure from Camp Nou. To not worry about possession, to let them wear themselves out, and do them on the break.  -so aptly demonstrated by the CFC dvd  (mines almost worn oit )  'the greatest game' when we won 4-2 against the Catalans

[quickpassnmove 924]

I don't know who is to blame, but CFC haven't figured out how to build a strong squad yet. I thought good things were underway when we dumped Luiz and Torres, but since then (and years before), I've been waiting to see quality and depth in centre midfield and fullback. 

I like the suggestion that CFC need people who really know football on the board. Seems that what DYC says on page 1 of this thread is true: appointments have been "all over the place;" meaning Chelsea have not had a coherent vision to go with the constant change of managers and lack of youth integration.

Other top clubs put a lot of effort into finding the right players for centre mid and fullback. This one has spent a lot of time (many seasons now) with a thin layer and lack of quality in those positions. Now centre back is looking weaker and we lack strikers, so... like Guardiola said. 

[xPetrCechx 13,573]

[BlueLion. 21,491]

The fact we've left our business until this late in the window is proof Emenalo has to go. 

[BlueLyon 9,359]

The core to our problems is IMO board. While City for example has people like Soriano or Begiristain who actualy know how to run the club, we are stuck with Emenalo and co.

Also Granovskaia...Milan has female among directors and look where they are (that was sexist but you get the point). Tho she did some good work. But since Gourlay left, transfers were nothing but disaster. Cuadrado, Pedro, Djilo, Falcao...

 

[manpe 10,861]

47 minutes ago, BlueLyon said:

The core to our problems is IMO board. While City for example has people like Soriano or Begiristain who actualy know how to run the club, we are stuck with Emenalo and co.

Also Granovskaia...Milan has female among directors and look where they are (that was sexist but you get the point). Tho she did some good work. But since Gourlay left, transfers were nothing but disaster. Cuadrado, Pedro, Djilo, Falcao...

 

Why doesn't Abramovich get anywhere near so much critique? I've heard many times that he has the final say in everything. He hired those people so it all comes down to him. Also, contrary to popular belief, I don't think Cuadrado and Pedro were bad transfers. They were known as quality players, one coming off from a spectacular WC and the other being a useful cog in Barca's machine. Has anybody noticed that attacking players tend to flop here more often than not? Not sure it has much to do with the bureaucrats, but rather team management. Anyway, imo Cuadrado was and Pedro is a sensible signing, but one didn't work out and the other one is too soon to judge especially under spectacular circumstances (coming to the worst Chelsea team in decades, Pedro was never meant to be a player to fix that).

[Blue_Fox_ 2,086]

1 hour ago, BlueLyon said:

Also Granovskaia...Milan has female among directors and look where they are (that was sexist but you get the point)

Darn crazy female hormones each month.

[kmk108 1,186]

1 hour ago, manpe said:

Why doesn't Abramovich get anywhere near so much critique? I've heard many times that he has the final say in everything. He hired those people so it all comes down to him. Also, contrary to popular belief, I don't think Cuadrado and Pedro were bad transfers. They were known as quality players, one coming off from a spectacular WC and the other being a useful cog in Barca's machine. Has anybody noticed that attacking players tend to flop here more often than not? Not sure it has much to do with the bureaucrats, but rather team management. Anyway, imo Cuadrado was and Pedro is a sensible signing, but one didn't work out and the other one is too soon to judge especially under spectacular circumstances (coming to the worst Chelsea team in decades, Pedro was never meant to be a player to fix that).

It's turned out that these signings haven't been in accordance with the way we have played recently. The players are quality, but they aren't the players that fit into the system being employed. Whether that's an issue with the board not getting players that fit the system or the manager for not adapting the system to the players isn't too important. It's a lack of uniformity from the top down that Hamas to be addressed I the summer. The board needs to get together, figure out the vision of the club in terms of business, play and aspiration. Once that's figured out, they need to get a manager that fits this vision and work with the manager to get the best players to fit this vision. This is the only way this club can be successful.

IMO, everyone deserves blame, but I think a lot of people are hesitant to criticize Roman because of the success that has come since his arrival.

[Special Juan 28,139]

I don't think RA has the second clue what's going on, I think the people and shit collectors below him give out a smoke screen and actually convince him that these signings like Papi, Mazad (MLSBloke) Pato and Rahman are actually sublime talents..

What next....Kaka?

[BlueLyon 9,359]

6 hours ago, manpe said:

Why doesn't Abramovich get anywhere near so much critique? I've heard many times that he has the final say in everything. He hired those people so it all comes down to him. Also, contrary to popular belief, I don't think Cuadrado and Pedro were bad transfers. They were known as quality players, one coming off from a spectacular WC and the other being a useful cog in Barca's machine. Has anybody noticed that attacking players tend to flop here more often than not? Not sure it has much to do with the bureaucrats, but rather team management. Anyway, imo Cuadrado was and Pedro is a sensible signing, but one didn't work out and the other one is too soon to judge especially under spectacular circumstances (coming to the worst Chelsea team in decades, Pedro was never meant to be a player to fix that).

Well sure he is responsible who will be in board. His influence on transfers and football related decisions is too big I guess. But he is our owner. There is not much we can do about it. Plus he has done incredible things for the club, he seems to genuinely like Chelsea, but that might be THE problem. He gets involved too much. If only he brought proper board, that would be great.

[Fulham Broadway 17,332]

Never mind about JT, we've Papa and Hector. The Nigerian 'individual' has it all under control.