Pedro Rodríguez

[Last Sicarius 610]

I think he can be like Sanchez but not in all. If he scores some goals it will be legit for me.

[ice-boy 165]

Is there any chance to announce today?

[Iggy Doonican 4,186]

Mourinho allegedly said '' You can tell if a youngster can make it by watching him for 20 minutes''. Which begs the question how long did he watch Cuadrado for if at all. What did he see in Cuadrado in January that made him sign that useless tit instead of Pedro?. Pedro was ineligible for the Champions League but did Cuadrado get any minutes at all can't remember off hand. Now in August we buy Pedro questions have to be asked about our transfer policy. Anyway welcome Pedro hope you do the business my son.

[ice-boy 165]

what a lad

[stroey 2,525]

Transfer News Live ‏@DeadlineDayLive 2 min

Cesc Fàbregas spoke to Pedro to ask about the status of his move to Man Utd last Friday. Mourinho then authorised move. (Source: @garbosj)

Another assist from Fabregas?

[Unionjack 7,531]

If Pedro coming creates any sort of a hunger or passion with our lads to be a starter then it can only be good. Right now I dont see any passion or enthusiasm.

I'm afraid unless it was written in Romans blood that I was going to be a 1st team starter if I was to join Chelsea I would think long and hard with the record we have for MFs. I love us dearly but we get thru more midfielders than Tescos get thru carrier bags.

[King11Didier 916]

Transfer News Live ‏@DeadlineDayLive 2 min

Cesc Fàbregas spoke to Pedro to ask about the status of his move to Man Utd last Friday. Mourinho then authorised move. (Source: @garbosj)

Another assist from Fabregas?

His first for this season.

[TheOneChan95 225]

I'm happy that it looks like it's going to happen. However I don't think he is our "saviour" . If you are expecting a Sanchez level of impact you might be disappointed. I personally think he will be the more polished version of Shirley which I believe will be good enough.

[supporter 3,088]

any player looks better around Messi??? So why didnt Affelay look better? why didnt Tello look better? why didnt Cuenca look better? why does Alexis Sanchez now look better without Messi??? why did Suarez look better at Liverpool? why does Fabregas look better at Chelsea without Messi???

and as for Pique what are you talking about he was one of the best CB's on the planet last season!

I think you put very different examples:

1. Alexis Sanchez did well in Barcelona because he is a great player, a top player, who joined Barcelona for 45 million euros. Alexis Sanchez is one of the best players in the world. And he was good at Barcelona and with Arsenal.

2. But Cuenca, Affelay or Tello were not great players and they did not seem great players with or without Mesis. In fact, they just did not have chances to play in Barcelona. Even Affelay had a major injury. They can not be put into the same comment with Alexis Sanchez.

3. All players, including Messi, with Barcelona looks better than their previous teams or national teams. And the main culprits of that is Messi, Xavi, Iniesta and his style of play. Barcelona has won 4 Champions Leagues in the last nine years.

4. Yes, around Messi Any player looks better. Like Maradona when he won the World Cup in Mexico 86 with players like Valdano ....

5. Pique and Puyol was one of the best pairs of centre-backs in history. But Pique has had a horrible performance without Puyol, except for the last five months of last season. In fact, the Pique himself said last year (at the beginning of last season) that he was no longer one of the best centre-backs in the world. In the three official matches of this season (in the European Super Cup and the Spanish Super Cup) Pique has had a horrible performance. He is a rather childish player.

And I think it is quite logical to be better player under "the umbrella of Leo Messi".

Regards.

[ice-boy 165]

[Pacquiao 1,834]

I think you put very different examples:

1. Alexis Sanchez did well in Barcelona because he is a great player, a top player, who joined Barcelona for 45 million euros. Alexis Sanchez is one of the best players in the world. And he was good at Barcelona and with Arsenal.

2. But Cuenca, Affelay or Tello were not great players and they did not seem great players with or without Mesis. In fact, they just did not have chances to play in Barcelona. Even Affelay had a major injury. They can not be put into the same comment with Alexis Sanchez.

3. All players, including Messi, with Barcelona looks better than their previous teams or national teams. And the main culprits of that is Messi, Xavi, Iniesta and his style of play. Barcelona has won 4 Champions Leagues in the last nine years.

4. Yes, around Messi Any player looks better. Like Maradona when he won the World Cup in Mexico 86 with players like Valdano ....

5. Pique and Puyol was one of the best pairs of centre-backs in history. But Pique has had a horrible performance without Puyol, except for the last five months of last season. In fact, the Pique himself said last year (at the beginning of last season) that he was no longer one of the best centre-backs in the world. In the three official matches of this season (in the European Super Cup and the Spanish Super Cup) Pique has had a horrible performance. He is a rather childish player.

And I think it is quite logical to be better player under "the umbrella of Leo Messi".

Regards.

so you just contradicted yourself! well done.

[Polo7 3,496]

His dribbling is amazing. Up there with Hazard for sure. Our wing play will be amazing.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

what a lad

LADregas, FabreLAD, etc. etc.

[supporter 3,088]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwC4OMQFmQw

[Chelsea4 1,521]

I'm happy that it looks like it's going to happen. However I don't think he is our "saviour" . If you are expecting a Sanchez level of impact you might be disappointed. I personally think he will be the more polished version of Shirley which I believe will be good enough.

Pedro was better than Sanchez at Barcelona but then Barcelona signed Neymar.