Jump to content

Radamel Falcao


BlueLion.
 Share

Recommended Posts

A horrid performance from the TEAM all round but it was in games like today where one big man like Drogba, or Lampard would pop up and get the crucial goal. We need some potency up front, complain about Torres's service all you like a good striker will make room for himself and get his head into the game. January can't come soon enough...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then we shouldn't bother ourselves by buying any strikers if there's a possibility that they will fail ! stupid logic.

I'm not saying we shouldn't buy, Because its clear we have to buy. But we have to be careful what we do, and how much we spend. Because no matter what, There's always a chance that the signing will flop and under-perform.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying we shouldn't buy, Because its clear we have to buy. But we have to be careful what we do, and how much we spend. Because no matter what, There's always a chance that the signing will flop and under-perform.

I actually see where you're coming from. Signing Torres has put me off making big-money signings up-front because we really don't have a particularly good record with them. Shevchenko, Mutu, Torres, Sutton, Fleck, Casiraghi....can't we just pick up another Mark Stein??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying we shouldn't buy, Because its clear we have to buy. But we have to be careful what we do, and how much we spend. Because no matter what, There's always a chance that the signing will flop and under-perform.

There is always a chance of that happening, of course. But I think there is much less of a chance of it happening with Falcao. His mentality and his attitude is much stronger than Torres' and if Falcao was to Flop, I'm guessing it would be because of injury problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm excited to see him tonight. The last time I saw a match of him live was when he raped us, so he has some expectiations to forfill. No, seriously, I've never seen him coming to us in January and with our recent performances and the fact that Atletico are playing one of the best seasons they've ever played, chances aren't increasing. Still hoping for summer though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a great article to calm any of those who have doubts over Falcao"flopping".

Falcao will cost Chelsea or Manchester City £100m (this figure includes wages for a presumed 200k per week contract and is a figure I don't know how they got, he has a 48 mill clause and this is typical senseationlising. Nothing to see here)but the Atletico Madrid striker is worth every penny

On the pitch just now, it is no different. As every match passes without Fernando Torres scoring, the spectre of Radamel Falcao moves into sharper focus.

With 14 goals in 13 matches so far this season for Atletico Madrid, Falcao goes into Saturday’s derby against Real boasting a better strike rate than Cristiano Ronaldo and playing for the team who are presenting Barcelona with their biggest domestic threat.

On form, comparisons with Ronaldo and Lionel Messi have become increasingly legitimate.

For Chelsea and Manchester City, the allure only deepens at the knowledge that Falcao is almost certainly available, perhaps in January but more likely at the end of the season, for anyone willing to pay a release clause of £48 million.

Add on wage demands that are likely to exceed £200,000 a week and the £100 million question for Roman Abramovich and Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed al Nahyan, two owners whose fingers have already been burnt in the transfer market, is whether Falcao is really worth it.

Yet from Colombia to Spain, via Portugal and Argentina, those who have worked closest with him are convinced. Diego Simeone, who has managed Falcao at River Plate and now Atletico, predicts that he will become, quite simply, the “best in the world”.

Why? “Because he will keep on improving,” says Simeone.

“He has an intuition and a level of accuracy in front of goal that I have only ever seen in Hugo Sanchez but he is a more complete player. I am convinced he will become the best in his position.”

Diego Godin, a team-mate at Atletico, believes that he already has the edge over Ronaldo:

He is a penalty box player but he can also play with his back to goal and hold the ball up,” says Godin. “He moves intelligently without the ball but, as a goal scorer, he is incredible. Cristiano is a little bit more predictable. I think he is just a notch below Falcao.”

His temperament, especially a down-to-earth modesty, is also contrasted with Ronaldo. Jorge Lopez, a journalist for Diario Olé who got to know Falcao during his four years at River Plate, describes him as the antipathy of many modern players. “He’s an anti-hero in the sense that he is nothing like Cristiano Ronaldo,” he says. “He is a very religious man; a devout believer who tries to remain very humble despite the fame and fortune now coming his way.

"But he’s tough – he learnt to be tough at River both on the pitch where he got kicked all over the place as soon as defences realised how good he was, and also off the pitch where he was a young kid away from home.”

Between City and Chelsea just now, there can be little doubt whose need is the greatest. And, among those who know Falcao best, there is the instinctive sense that he would fit ideally into the more fluid and creative style that Abramovich apparently craves.

Eduardo Lara gave Falcao his international debut for the Colombia Under-17 team and believes that he would also maximise the potential of Chelsea’s other recent acquisitions.

“The special thing about him is that combines that brilliant finishing with such a great touch,” said Lara. “He can drop back into midfield and play with players like Eden Hazard, Juan Mata and Oscar. He is lethal in front of goal and has the touch of a cultured midfield player. I have no doubt at all that Falcao would fit into that team and that Rafa Benítez would get the best out of him. When you have a player that talented you know that based on ability he will fit in anywhere so it becomes down to character and he has the character to go to another country and be a success.He has already shown it in Argentina, Portugal and Spain and, if he goes to London, he will demonstrate it again without any problem.”

A particularly telling comparison is also drawn by Gregorio Manzano, who has managed both Torres and Falcao at Atletico.

“You look at how good he [Falcao] is now and think how much better he would be with the best players around him,” says Manzano. “There would be no problem adapting to a style where he had to work as a lone striker. In terms of coping with the physical demands of the Premier League he definitely has the strength.”

Intriguingly, Manzano describes Torres as a “confidence player” and is also certain that he will eventually revive his career. But, as Abramovich considers the gamble of breaking the British transfer record for the third time on a striker, there is specific reassurance about Falcao’s psychological ability to deal with the pressure of such a move.

“He shows that mental toughness in finals,” said Manzano.“Think about the Europa League final with Porto, the Europa League final with Atletico Madrid against Athletic Bilbao and the Super Cup win over Chelsea.You need enormous mental strength to play those type of games the way he does as if they were just another match. Whoever signs Falcao will have made the right decision. He is as close to a safe bet as you can have.”

falcao_2415262b.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would never beg nor even ask for Roman to splash 100 million on Messi, let alone Falcao. No player is worth that amount of money , especially when there are plenty of other clinical strikers who would fit the bill here. I would rather Cavani over Falcao anyways as I could see him being the big presence player we need up top again. Having said that, if we were to bring Falcao here then I certainly wouldn't moan about it, just not for 100 million pounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would never beg nor even ask for Roman to splash 100 million on Messi, let alone Falcao. No player is worth that amount of money , especially when there are plenty of other clinical strikers who would fit the bill here. I would rather Cavani over Falcao anyways as I could see him being the big presence player we need up top again. Having said that, if we were to bring Falcao here then I certainly wouldn't moan about it, just not for 100 million pounds.

are you seriously saying you would be against roman paying £100 Million for Messi? that would be a bargain for him!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You