Mr_President 404 Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 I DREAM THE DAY I HEAR MY GRANDSON TALKING ABOUT HOW HE WANTS HIS TEAM TO PLAY LIKE CHELSEA ONCE DID!FUCK BARCELONA!I get very angry when people say we need to play like Barça. There are many ways to play great football without imitating the cunts. I dont want us playing with a flase #9, either because we already are and because I am more traditional. Brazil (70/82), Santos (60s), RM (60s), Ajax (70s), Flamengo (80s), Milan (90s), Palmeiras (96) and Chelsea (05-09) all made quite an impact and will be rembered without in any way conecting with Barcelona.I want a quick, compact, lethal and creative team, not some passing bullshit without a proper finisher. I want a team that we can all relate to EPL and Chelsea.Imagine a good manager putting together the likes of Hummels, JT, Cole, Vidal/De Rossi, Oscar, Hazard, Mata and Falcao/Cavani and transforming them into legend. It will stay on forever and we wouldnt have to listen to "Chelsea vs Barcelona" comparisons.Yes, I want us to have the same historical reputation Pep Guardiola`s side have. I only want it to be our identidy, not someone else`s.Great post mate. Can't stand this nonsense with wanting to imitate Barcelona and the tiki-taka bullshit, I want us to make our own history and stay true to our own characteristics instead of copying another team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jcar92 66 Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 Well, i don't think that we're imitating them just because we started playing with a false 9 or some player that is not the casual finisher, "fox in the box".Tiki-taka is one thing, the false 9, another. The false 9 is just a new position, just like others that emerged through the evolution of the game. We can't discard this... We need to play with a style according to our team, not something that we want. And to be true... I really think that this work for us, so, why not?. If we can manage to have a player that can play in and outside the area, awesome, we make him and mazacar trade positions, with the trio going into the area while he goes outside.About the tiki-taka, agree, that's Barcelona, not us. We also play with passes, but we're different. But that got nothing to do with the False 9. I think that we have to consider this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jcar92 66 Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 Maybe this is what our team needs. Of course, it could work with the 9... But to me, we just have to see the team playing with Fernando Torres, he holds the Mazacar back. With a false 9 they would go into the area more times, i think that we would have more variations in the attack, letting us more dangerous. =) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIALLI 9 Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 Part of me wants Chelsea to go back to the days when Roman wasn`t running the club. What a f*ckin carry on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeB 1,281 Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 Lots of fuss about false nines, that's a very wise use against a parked team. And most strikers can hold that role, at least the ones who don't just think about scoring.False nine is just about carryng a defender out of the back to let another insert with a diagonal, 3rd man run Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rmpr 8,977 Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 False nine is just about carryng a defender out of the back to let another insert with a diagonal, 3rd man runNo it is not, what you explain as a false nine is a simple movement most great strikers (#9) do. You basically discribed a striker with a lot of movement, the false nine is more than that, he has a different mentality and objective.Ronaldo did it quite frequently, is he a false nine? Suarez? Aguero?False nine is actually someone who most of the time composes the AM line (do not know if that is the right term). Messi and Neymar are more outside the penalty box draging defenders than inside the box waiting for a service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jcar92 66 Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 No it is not, what you explain as a false nine is a simple movement most great strikers (#9) do. You basically discribed a striker with a lot of movement, the false nine is more than that, he has a different mentality and objective.Ronaldo did it quite frequently, is he a false nine? Suarez? Aguero?False nine is actually someone who most of the time composes the AM line (do not know if that is the right term). Messi and Neymar are more outside the penalty box draging defenders than inside the box waiting for a service.Exactly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corner 456 Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 Playing with a false #9 is an interesting idea. Obviously, I can see why RDM tried it. Torres hasn't been exactly been playing well. But it made no sense to try it against a team that plays with three centre-backs. So let's say the false #9 does drag one of the centre-backs out of position, there are still two others there. And that doesn't leave much space to exploit. It also didn't make much sense to try it in a match where you set up defensively, knowing you're not going to dominate possession.But what other choice did RDM have? Hazard up front sounds more dangerous than Torres up front right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jcar92 66 Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 Playing with a false #9 is an interesting idea. Obviously, I can see why RDM tried it. Torres hasn't been exactly been playing well. But it made no sense to try it against a team that plays with three centre-backs. So let's say the false #9 does drag one of the centre-backs out of position, there are still two others there. And that doesn't leave much space to exploit. It also didn't make much sense to try it in a match where you set up defensively, knowing you're not going to dominate possession.But what other choice did RDM have? Hazard up front sounds more dangerous than Torres up front right now.The role of the false 9 is not just bring the centre-back outside, when he leaves the area, other player goes into it, and not just there, even in the midfield... This makes the team trade positions a lot, this confuses any defense... And makes more options to the player holding the ball, more options of pass, more variations of attack. With the Mazacar, we talk a lot about who should be at the sides, who to be in the center role... That would be the end of this. Each time, one player in each of those positions... If we manage to buy a Deep Lying playmaker, it could be even better, he could even come foward to orchestrate...Well, just dreaming... And sorry for the bad english, still learning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Cool 388 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 Our players are nowhere near the level of Barcelona's in midfield in terms of technical skill and creativity. Also, their style would be much less effective in England because of how much more physical it is in the Premier League (clear example would be their match against us in the CL semis). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cuk Kusmayadi 0 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 if this is possible Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nachikethas 1,154 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 i dont know but we are certainly playing with no strikers at this moment so how hard it can be.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.