Jump to content

🇧🇪 Eden Hazard


the wes
 Share

Recommended Posts

We having these debates because of his potential.

Yes he has been great, phenomenal at times but everyone sees how mindblowing he can/ will be.

The gab between him being phenomenal and having a good game is to big and thats why he's being critized easely but im convinced that will be better by getting older.

This season he stepped up already in the big games, something he lacked last season.

I think it's safe to say he is on track to fulfilling his potential. He has already achieved a lot in his short career having spent most of it at an average sized French club and in a tumultuous first season at Chelsea. This puts him at an obvious disadvantage to the likes of Ronaldo and Messi who had been at great teams from their teenage years. Can you imagine this is only Eden's first year playing in the Champions league knock-out phases? Many people forget these little (big really in terms of experience) things.

It's the fault of some of the fans not Eden or his performances. He doesn't deserve to be criticized because he has been blameless for virtually most of the season. If we are going to criticize our best player then we might as well criticize everyone at Chelsea.

Can't we just celebrate a player for his performance anymore instead of criticizing him for how good we want (expect) him to become? I think it's more healthy if we talk about the areas of his game he can improve on instead of building him up to the player we want him to be. That's the duty of Eden himself and the coaches not ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our team is built on a solid defense. Learn to respect opinions instead of calling it bullshit. If you disagree you are welcome to. I'm not forcing it down your throat.

No. Our team is built on a solid defense that's true. But saying Azpi is more important than Hazard that's just wrong bullshit it's not an opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. Our team is built on a solid defense that's true. But saying Azpi is more important than Hazard that's just wrong bullshit it's not an opinion.

Well keep the sentence to yourself. What you're saying is not an opinion either, it's utter bullshit mixed into one sentence that is 110% wrong. Like how that feels?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can have an opinion fine, but you are wrong. Hazard is much more important.

And I say you're wrong. The defense is as much as important as the attack is. Said it before too, Hazard can have a hat-trick every game, wouldn't make a difference if we're letting in 4 goals every game either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop the argument of who is important and who not it a collective work like @special Juan said, work together gives you more productivity than doing it individually feel me?

Eeww! Nobody wants to feel you!!

:Goober:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can have an opinion fine, but you are wrong. Hazard is much more important.

And I say you're wrong. The defense is as much as important as the attack is. Said it before too, Hazard can have a hat-trick every game, wouldn't make a difference if we're letting in 4 goals every game either.

Erm, how about you two just agree to disagree? The discussion is basically going nowhere but around the bush..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Erm, how about you two just agree to disagree? The discussion is basically going nowhere but around the bush..

That's exactly what I told him. Instead he thinks he is some kind of footballing god and calls opinions wrong. All he has to do is just disagree instead of calling me out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I say you're wrong. The defense is as much as important as the attack is. Said it before too, Hazard can have a hat-trick every game, wouldn't make a difference if we're letting in 4 goals every game either.

NO. I wasn't comparing the defense and the attack. I was comparing AZPI and Hazard! Hazard is more crucial. If cole was to be played instead of Azpi we would have conceded a little bit more maybe 6 points difference if Hazard was not to play we would have been 15 points difference. You were wrong. Face it and let's end this discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...