Politics & Stuff

[Fernando 6,594]

2 hours ago, Fulham Broadway said:

''With no regard for international law, people may think its fine when its countries you dont like, but it will be you next'' UN official.

I hope they go for Maduro and Petro 😁😎

Edited Wednesday at 10:23 by Fernando

[Fernando 6,594]

 

 

Don't think it's Biden fault but the incompetence of the BLS. 

Trump did right by firing them because for almost a year every time the BLS put some numbers down they had to make major revisions. 

So I always found that fishy before Trump got rid of the BLS head. 

And in the end my theory was right they where being incompetent for the past few years. That's why those major revisions every month that jobs report would constantly be revised down was telling. 

 

Edited Wednesday at 10:27 by Fernando

[Vesper 30,282]

[Fulham Broadway 17,357]

Paedophile in plain sight - just like Jimmy Saville.

Kompromat zionist style = their forever wars

Give the man the Nobel Peace prize

[Fernando 6,594]

US tries to shoot down mysterious UAP. Whistleblower video and what we know

The viral video provided by an anonymous whistleblower to Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Missouri, appears to show a military drone attempt and fail to shoot down an unidentified object.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/09/10/ufo-hearing-video-hellfire-missile/86073340007/

 

I don't believe in aliens. But if that is real then someone has some insane technology. And if they have it why they have not taken over? 

It can't be Russian as they are struggling with Ukraine war.

It can't be Israel as they can't get rid of Hamas in Gass, while destrying everything there...

It can't be USA, as they are investigating this and Trunp would use it to conquer the world.

So who has it? 

[DDA 9,983]

2 hours ago, Fernando said:

US tries to shoot down mysterious UAP. Whistleblower video and what we know

The viral video provided by an anonymous whistleblower to Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Missouri, appears to show a military drone attempt and fail to shoot down an unidentified object.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/09/10/ufo-hearing-video-hellfire-missile/86073340007/

 

I don't believe in aliens. But if that is real then someone has some insane technology. And if they have it why they have not taken over? 

It can't be Russian as they are struggling with Ukraine war.

It can't be Israel as they can't get rid of Hamas in Gass, while destrying everything there...

It can't be USA, as they are investigating this and Trunp would use it to conquer the world.

So who has it? 

 

[Vesper 30,282]

• https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c206zm81z4gt

• Conservative activist Charlie Kirk has died after being been shot at a campus event in Utah, says President Trump

• Kirk - an influential ally of the president - was known for holding open-air debates on campuses across the country

• "The Great, and even Legendary, Charlie Kirk, is dead," writes Trump. "No one understood or had the Heart of the Youth in the United States of America better than Charlie"

• A suspect was taken into custody but later released - the university says the shot was fired from around 200 yards away

• One video shows Kirk being asked about mass shootings before the shot was fired

• There was shock in the White House when the news broke, reports Bernd Debusmann Jr

• Kirk was close to both the president and his family - in January he flew to Greenland with Donald Trump Jr

[Vesper 30,282]

1 shot only

200 metres away, shooter was up in a building

sure sounds like a professional hit to me

he was 31 years old

[Fernando 6,594]

2 hours ago, DDA said:

 

I still don't believe in aliens. No proof of that, there's advance technology in the video. Nothing about aliens. 

[Fernando 6,594]

16 hours ago, DDA said:

 

I think that guy Elisando is not honest. He just wanted to make money by selling books. 

 I still don't believe in aliens and as well I'm skeptical with many videos and photos as we can use AI. 

However some are real and they just show advance technology. 

 

 

Edited Thursday at 11:47 by Fernando

[Fulham Broadway 17,357]

In Fox news style ''Some people say Trump is an alien''

[Fernando 6,594]

31 minutes ago, Fulham Broadway said:

In Fox news style ''Some people say Trump is an alien''

First time I see this guy (Thesneezingmonkey youtube) as I was doing some research on Elisando after that video and I'm skeptical like him. 

This whole UFO thing is a shennanigan of people wanting to milk money to a audience who loves conspiracy theory. 

But the reality that only a few are unexplained and that does not mean aliens. People want to believe those conspiracy theory because they believe in boogeyman and that there's some shadow secret goverment going on for 100 of years....

 

 

Edited Thursday at 14:02 by Fernando

[Vesper 30,282]

On 10/09/2025 at 12:22, Fernando said:

I hope they go for Maduro and Petro 😁😎

What does 'go for' mean?

Are you advocating for the US to invade sovereign nations and militarily take out their governements via kinetic warfare?

[Vesper 30,282]

 

https://cognitivedissident.substack.com/p/charlie-kirk-31-shot-dead-in-utah

“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows.”
— Galatians 6:7 in the New Testament

“You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won’t have a single gun death. That is nonsense. It’s drivel. …I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.”

— Charlie Kirk, 2023 TPUSA

Charlie Kirk has long argued that the epidemic of gun violence in America is the regrettable, but acceptable, price of liberty.

In his words, the trade-off is a “prudent deal,” a “rational” sacrifice to preserve the Second Amendment and protect what he calls “God-given rights.” (He said these cruel and heartless words at a speaking event in April 2023 — I'm just the messenger.)

When children are slaughtered in their classrooms, when congregants are gunned down in churches, when families are erased at grocery stores, Kirk’s response is not grief but calculus. The deaths are tragic, he says, but worth it. A necessary toll paid at freedom’s gate.

“Thought and prayers.”
— Conservative party after every public shooting

And so, when he himself was shot at a speaking event in Utah, the hypocrisy was deafening. Here was a man who minimized other people’s agony, suddenly forced to taste the violence he once dismissed.

This is what I mean by Second Amendment justice: not that the shooting should be celebrated, not that violence solves anything, but that the logic he defended has folded back on him like a tesseract.

He declared that mass shootings were an unfortunate but tolerable part of liberty. Then he became a victim of the very “tolerable violence” he worked so hard to normalize.

It is not justice in the sense of moral balance or divine retribution. It is justice in the way a mirror delivers justice: cold, impartial reflection. The gun culture he championed did not exempt him. The bullets he waved away in theory found their way into practice. He is not immune. None of us are.

The asymmetry here is staggering. When Nashville lost six lives, when Buffalo buried grandmothers and fathers, when children in Uvalde were executed one after another, Kirk’s sympathy was withheld. He hardened his rhetoric.

He doubled down. His “deal” demanded that others bear the cost, while he collected the political dividends of defiance. They are some sweet economic dividends, I tell you. Charlie Kirk gets paid for his support of the Conservative agenda.

But compassion is a muscle. Fail to exercise it for others, and you cannot expect it to be exercised for you. If he offered no tears for the slain, why should the public be compelled to offer them for him?

This is not schadenfreude. It is a reckoning. It is the exposure of a brutal dissonance at the core of American politics: leaders who protect the idea of rights while sacrificing the reality of lives.

Leaders who worship an amendment more than they grieve for the children whose bodies become its sacrament. Leaders who declare that freedom requires blood, and then recoil when their own blood is drawn.

Let me be clear: the shooting of Charlie Kirk was a crime. It was not noble resistance. It was not an answer. Political violence corrodes democracy; it breeds escalation, not resolution.

This event will make an unstable nation, more unstable. More fearful. It may even help lead the nation to martial law. It shouldn’t but sometimes when you are dealing with zealots, they may decide martyrs are necessary…

But understanding the irony is not the same as endorsing the act. Recognizing the karmic symmetry does not mean cheering it. What it means is this: when cruelty is normalized, when violence is rationalized, when deaths are rendered acceptable by ideology, eventually the logic boomerangs.

That is the lesson here, the harsh and unsentimental truth. You cannot unleash a culture of violence, bless it as liberty, and then feign shock when it arrives at your own doorstep.

The Second Amendment, as interpreted by Kirk and his allies, does not discriminate. It devours indiscriminately.

That is the justice of it. Not divine, not poetic — merely inevitable.

 

REFERENCES:

2025. “Charlie Kirk: Trump Ally Shot at Campus Event in Utah.” BBC News. 2025.
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c206zm81z4gt

Mordowanec, Nick. 2023. “Charlie Kirk Says Gun Deaths ‘Unfortunately’ Worth It to Keep 2nd Amendment.” Newsweek. April 6, 2023.

https://www.newsweek.com/charlie-kirk-says-gun-deaths-worth-it-2nd-amendment-1793113

Edwards, David. 2023. “Charlie Kirk on Mass Shooting Victims: ‘We Cannot Allow Them to Emotionally Hijack the Narrative.’” Raw Story. April 10, 2023.

https://www.rawstory.com/charlie-kirk-louisville-shooting/

[Fernando 6,594]

3 hours ago, Vesper said:

What does 'go for' mean?

Are you advocating for the US to invade sovereign nations and militarily take out their governements via kinetic warfare?

I was playing. But in truth if one was able to take a poll and see how the Venezuela would see if usa did this in their country? The Venezuela people that is. Likewise in Colombia with Petro. 

Then maybe go for it would have a reason. 

Edited Thursday at 23:06 by Fernando

[Fernando 6,594]

59 minutes ago, Vesper said:

In his words, the trade-off is a “prudent deal,” a “rational” sacrifice to preserve the Second Amendment and protect what he calls “God-given rights.” (He said these cruel and heartless words at a speaking event in April 2023 — I'm just the messenger.)

I will say this I'm conservative but I never share this belief because if we go by God and the Bible we are a fallen people and we should not have that power. 

So I will never agree with this. 

[NikkiCFC 8,370]

7 hours ago, Fernando said:

I was playing. But in truth if one was able to take a poll and see how the Venezuela would see if usa did this in their country? The Venezuela people that is. Likewise in Colombia with Petro. 

Then maybe go for it would have a reason. 

This is the only reason 🇺🇸 is interested in 🇻🇪 

 

[Fulham Broadway 17,357]

9 hours ago, Vesper said:

 

https://cognitivedissident.substack.com/p/charlie-kirk-31-shot-dead-in-utah

“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows.”
— Galatians 6:7 in the New Testament

“You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won’t have a single gun death. That is nonsense. It’s drivel. …I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.”

— Charlie Kirk, 2023 TPUSA

Charlie Kirk has long argued that the epidemic of gun violence in America is the regrettable, but acceptable, price of liberty.

In his words, the trade-off is a “prudent deal,” a “rational” sacrifice to preserve the Second Amendment and protect what he calls “God-given rights.” (He said these cruel and heartless words at a speaking event in April 2023 — I'm just the messenger.)

When children are slaughtered in their classrooms, when congregants are gunned down in churches, when families are erased at grocery stores, Kirk’s response is not grief but calculus. The deaths are tragic, he says, but worth it. A necessary toll paid at freedom’s gate.

“Thought and prayers.”
— Conservative party after every public shooting

And so, when he himself was shot at a speaking event in Utah, the hypocrisy was deafening. Here was a man who minimized other people’s agony, suddenly forced to taste the violence he once dismissed.

This is what I mean by Second Amendment justice: not that the shooting should be celebrated, not that violence solves anything, but that the logic he defended has folded back on him like a tesseract.

He declared that mass shootings were an unfortunate but tolerable part of liberty. Then he became a victim of the very “tolerable violence” he worked so hard to normalize.

It is not justice in the sense of moral balance or divine retribution. It is justice in the way a mirror delivers justice: cold, impartial reflection. The gun culture he championed did not exempt him. The bullets he waved away in theory found their way into practice. He is not immune. None of us are.

The asymmetry here is staggering. When Nashville lost six lives, when Buffalo buried grandmothers and fathers, when children in Uvalde were executed one after another, Kirk’s sympathy was withheld. He hardened his rhetoric.

He doubled down. His “deal” demanded that others bear the cost, while he collected the political dividends of defiance. They are some sweet economic dividends, I tell you. Charlie Kirk gets paid for his support of the Conservative agenda.

But compassion is a muscle. Fail to exercise it for others, and you cannot expect it to be exercised for you. If he offered no tears for the slain, why should the public be compelled to offer them for him?

This is not schadenfreude. It is a reckoning. It is the exposure of a brutal dissonance at the core of American politics: leaders who protect the idea of rights while sacrificing the reality of lives.

Leaders who worship an amendment more than they grieve for the children whose bodies become its sacrament. Leaders who declare that freedom requires blood, and then recoil when their own blood is drawn.

Let me be clear: the shooting of Charlie Kirk was a crime. It was not noble resistance. It was not an answer. Political violence corrodes democracy; it breeds escalation, not resolution.

This event will make an unstable nation, more unstable. More fearful. It may even help lead the nation to martial law. It shouldn’t but sometimes when you are dealing with zealots, they may decide martyrs are necessary…

But understanding the irony is not the same as endorsing the act. Recognizing the karmic symmetry does not mean cheering it. What it means is this: when cruelty is normalized, when violence is rationalized, when deaths are rendered acceptable by ideology, eventually the logic boomerangs.

That is the lesson here, the harsh and unsentimental truth. You cannot unleash a culture of violence, bless it as liberty, and then feign shock when it arrives at your own doorstep.

The Second Amendment, as interpreted by Kirk and his allies, does not discriminate. It devours indiscriminately.

That is the justice of it. Not divine, not poetic — merely inevitable.

 

REFERENCES:

2025. “Charlie Kirk: Trump Ally Shot at Campus Event in Utah.” BBC News. 2025.
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c206zm81z4gt

Mordowanec, Nick. 2023. “Charlie Kirk Says Gun Deaths ‘Unfortunately’ Worth It to Keep 2nd Amendment.” Newsweek. April 6, 2023.

https://www.newsweek.com/charlie-kirk-says-gun-deaths-worth-it-2nd-amendment-1793113

Edwards, David. 2023. “Charlie Kirk on Mass Shooting Victims: ‘We Cannot Allow Them to Emotionally Hijack the Narrative.’” Raw Story. April 10, 2023.

https://www.rawstory.com/charlie-kirk-louisville-shooting/

Last few weeks he was getting threatening texts for being 'anti semitic' -after he said when in Israel he took a helicopter from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, which he said took 45 minutes. He said the border has cameras every 10 meters, and 19 year olds with automatic machine guns everywhere. This was before Oct 7th 2023. So he was asking why Israeli guards were ordered to 'stand down' for 6 hours on Oct 7th ?

He was also citing evidence that Epstein was Mossad backed to compromise World leaders and 'royalty'. That Israel collapses without the support of White Americans, it doesnt care about Afro Americans or Hispanics. Israel has admitted it is losing the propaganda war - and although nearly all republicans back it - there is a sharp drop off when it comes to young white Republicans.

 

[Fernando 6,594]

4 hours ago, NikkiCFC said:

This is the only reason 🇺🇸 is interested in 🇻🇪 

 

They don't show the export because Russia has taken control of their oil. 

And yes that would be the reason and as to why usa wants in. 

Now if the Venezuelan people want usa to go into Venezuela and do something similar like USA did with Panama then their you have it. 

 

Edited yesterday at 11:12 by Fernando

[Fernando 6,594]

3 hours ago, Fulham Broadway said:

Last few weeks he was getting threatening texts for being 'anti semitic' -after he said when in Israel he took a helicopter from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, which he said took 45 minutes. He said the border has cameras every 10 meters, and 19 year olds with automatic machine guns everywhere. This was before Oct 7th 2023. So he was asking why Israeli guards were ordered to 'stand down' for 6 hours on Oct 7th ?

He was also citing evidence that Epstein was Mossad backed to compromise World leaders and 'royalty'. That Israel collapses without the support of White Americans, it doesnt care about Afro Americans or Hispanics. Israel has admitted it is losing the propaganda war - and although nearly all republicans back it - there is a sharp drop off when it comes to young white Republicans.

 

That's as about conspiracy theories as the UFO.