manpe 10,861 Posted March 25, 2012 Share Posted March 25, 2012 Yup you got it right.But I must wonder, why is grammar so important in a forum?Is this an English class or something?Nonetheless thank you for pointing that out.It's my pedantic nature, you may ignore it. It's just that I've seen you writing it that way over and over again since AVB sacking and it got to a point where I couldn't resist but point it out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strike 7,493 Posted March 25, 2012 Share Posted March 25, 2012 Yup you got it right.But I must wonder, why is grammar so important in a forum?Is this an English class or something?Nonetheless thank you for pointing that out.Justin-3d , its not the forum, its you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin_3d 1,140 Posted March 25, 2012 Share Posted March 25, 2012 Justin-3d , its not the forum, its youWhat you mean?I find it funny that instead of debating about something, which is what a forum is about people worry about grammar.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strike 7,493 Posted March 25, 2012 Share Posted March 25, 2012 What you mean?I find it funny that instead of debating about something, which is what a forum is about people worry about grammar....No one's forcin you to stay on the forum,mate.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin_3d 1,140 Posted March 25, 2012 Share Posted March 25, 2012 No one's forcin you to stay on the forum,mate....What does that got to do with anything?A forum about the sport, is about to discuss sport and not grammar.If I want a forum about grammar I am sure there is one..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strike 7,493 Posted March 25, 2012 Share Posted March 25, 2012 What does that got to do with anything?A forum about the sport, is about to discuss sport and not grammar.If I want a forum about grammar I am sure there is one.....Yeah alright...i dont give a damn if you slept through grammar class anyway... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin_3d 1,140 Posted March 25, 2012 Share Posted March 25, 2012 If you don't like it cause I make fun of our ridicules board then I am sorry!But the fact is that no matter who we get, our board will keep doing the same dumb shit over and over again.In order for a new manager to work we need people who know how to plan. They have to detect what is that Chelsea needs what is require and not just throw money at the latest hot thing out there.So as far as I am concern any new manager that comes is already a dead man walking till we fix the main problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strike 7,493 Posted March 25, 2012 Share Posted March 25, 2012 Reports have suggested that Guss may consider a return to Chelsea in June but I would appreciate if Roman looked at younger candidates.Guss is 65 years old and since longevity is what we fans crave for,I think the job will be unsuitable for him.We need a coach in his 40s to 50s who has achieved substantial amount of recognition and is a great motivator but then again Roman contradicts the whole idea of managerial longevity at this club.Based on my judgements,I have shortlisted the 3 most viable and realistic candidates.1.Didier Deschamps2.Pep Guardiola3.Frank RijkaardFrank rijkaard ? Seriously? I would prefer hiddink over him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rubber bullets 1,183 Posted March 25, 2012 Share Posted March 25, 2012 With Guus, you to bear in mind that the only club he has done well with was his two spells with PSV. Apart from that he has been completly average (Valencia) or a complete flop (Real Madrid in the 90s). We are only judging him during a sport shell where veryone was glad and motivated that the previous manager was sacked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strike 7,493 Posted March 25, 2012 Share Posted March 25, 2012 If you don't like it cause I make fun of our ridicules board then I am sorry!But the fact is that no matter who we get, our board will keep doing the same dumb shit over and over again.In order for a new manager to work we need people who know how to plan. They have to detect what is that Chelsea needs what is require and not just throw money at the latest hot thing out there.So as far as I am concern any new manager that comes is already a dead man walking.Ok...overlookin your english, the board will give time to the next manager...they know the press and the public will be all over them otherwise..that is the reason for my optimism Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedsBlue 1,549 Posted March 25, 2012 Share Posted March 25, 2012 Frank rijkaard ? Seriously? I would prefer hiddink over himHiddink's age is the whole point of considering Frank and Dider otherwise I would have no problem with the arrival of Guss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strike 7,493 Posted March 25, 2012 Share Posted March 25, 2012 With Guus, you to bear in mind that the only club he has done well with was his two spells with PSV. Apart from that he has been completly average (Valencia) or a complete flop (Real Madrid in the 90s). We are only judging him during a sport shell where veryone was glad and motivated that the previous manager was sacked.Whatever the case, 2-1 v asnl, 4-1 v asnl,0-0 nd 1-1 vs barca, 3-1 and 4-4 vs liv, the round of 16 win vs juve....impressive Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin_3d 1,140 Posted March 25, 2012 Share Posted March 25, 2012 Ok...overlookin your english, the board will give time to the next manager...they know the press and the public will be all over them otherwise..that is the reason for my optimismLooking back at our managers after Mourinho I can look past by Avram, but then they appoint Scolari which after a couple of months they admit it was a mistake.So OK we can take that mistake and move on.Then the next appointment we get Carlo.What happen after 2 seasons? Was it another mistake?Then to fire him to get a total inexperience manager...What happen then, we made another mistake and fire him?How many more mistakes?Such a board would be fired by now in the real world, as you can't expect good things with a record like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strike 7,493 Posted March 25, 2012 Share Posted March 25, 2012 Hiddink's age is the whole point of considering Frank and Dider otherwise I would have no problem with the arrival of Guss.good point...a younger manager(not 33) is bettr...longetivity Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted March 25, 2012 Share Posted March 25, 2012 I'm sure that Arsenal scoring five at the Bridge would never happen under Deschamps.Yep. Let's face it, we're not getting a complete over all. Perhaps we should sacrifice the whole 'attacking philosophy' for a while and go with a strictly defensive coach who'll get results, get us fighting for the title & gradually bring in more creative and talented players, then try the whole 'attacking' thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin_3d 1,140 Posted March 25, 2012 Share Posted March 25, 2012 With Guus, you to bear in mind that the only club he has done well with was his two spells with PSV. Apart from that he has been completly average (Valencia) or a complete flop (Real Madrid in the 90s). We are only judging him during a sport shell where veryone was glad and motivated that the previous manager was sacked.Great point, as Guus also got helped from the new manager effect.That over hyped his record.Although I still like his record for what he did with Australia and S. Korea. Same stuff that I like Bielsa for what he did at Chile, and Moyes for his great work at Everton. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TacticalBlues 2,817 Posted March 25, 2012 Share Posted March 25, 2012 Yep.Let's face it, we're not getting a complete over all. Perhaps we should sacrifice the whole 'attacking philosophy' for a while and go with a strictly defensive coach who'll get results, get us fighting for the title & gradually bring in more creative and talented players, then try the whole 'attacking' thing.The attacking feat was an implausible aim with our depleted, aging and tired squad. At the moment we should comprise a plan B, but in the long term attacking is the only way forward. Look at Barcelona and Real Madrid, even Mourinho realised it. I think that was central to AVB's downfall, the inability to conceive a plan B. If we parked the bus to fourth place AVB would still be here today. I have no doubt in my mind he had a brilliant plan for next season, but we virtually threw it away in a brash move to gain some salvation. All I'm saying is that salvation was temporary, like I thought it would be. Perhaps that's what pisses me off the most about sacking AVB, even with all this shit nothing was ever going to get better so quickly. It defies logic to think otherwise. His attacking philosophy - or purported philosophy - did have its positives, that our defensive ones wouldn't. It aided in the acquisition of Mata, and was tantalising Hazard. I guess AVB couldn't go defensive, to extol a principle as fundamental an then treat it with contempt could of been equally fatal.Bottom line remains, this squad needs a major revamp - and we can play around with it all we want, it won't matter. The $ummer transfer window needs to be big for us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chelsea_4_eva 1,182 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 fabio capello? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedsBlue 1,549 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 fabio capello?Hes a very experienced candidate but the man is 65 years old and I am sure he will retire in another 2-3 years time so that doesn't help with our want of longevity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capriccioso 2,545 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Yep.Let's face it, we're not getting a complete over all. Perhaps we should sacrifice the whole 'attacking philosophy' for a while and go with a strictly defensive coach who'll get results, get us fighting for the title & gradually bring in more creative and talented players, then try the whole 'attacking' thing.You're right, we need a pragmatic manager. Villas-Boas and Guardiola are just too involved in their ideology to even consider developing a plan B. I have no problems with parking the bus to 4th for 3-4 years while we revamp the squad over that period and then try and be a bit more attacking and think about winning trophies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.