didierforever 7,349 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 LOL. Moses isn't fast now? Also, Sterling takes Moses and Coutinho spot. Schurrle has played how many games this season? Your football statements and basic accounting background is rather funny. Hahahahahaha... lol-max. Lets sign usain bolt. Cos all we need is pace. lol.Schurrle has made 32 appearances for us this season.Mine might be funny, yours are hilarious. BleedsBlue 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eligius 121 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 Hahahahahaha... lol-max. Lets sign usain bolt. Cos all we need is pace. lol.Schurrle has made 32 appearances for us this season.Mine might be funny, yours are hilarious.32 appearances and how many starts... 10 in the EPL.Funny how you think we needed to spend an additional amount for ams when we needed to strengthen CF, CM and the backline more. Jose's teams are sure built from ams, not cms or cbs or cfs.. YEAP!I like you though because you make me laugh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 32 appearances and how many starts... 10 in the EPL.Funny how you think we needed to spend an additional amount for ams when we needed to strengthen CF, CM and the backline more. Jose's teams are sure built from ams, not cms or cbs or cfs.. YEAP!I like you though because you make me laugh. Hahahaha.... dude. U do get that it was not me that spent the money on schurrle and willian. Jose did. I am only trying to make someone who has no clue about football understand as to why he did that. So if u think, I am laughable to think that we did right in buying them, then jose should get the same treatment, right? LOL.We needed to strengthen on backlone??? Lol. Gc-jt-dl as cbs. Azpu and iva as rbs. Bertrand and cole as lbs. Lol.U r absolutely right dude. This chelsea team is more reliant on STs rather than AM and cms. Oh wait!!!!! Lol.The feeling is mutual dude. Lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedsBlue 1,549 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 BOTH OF YOU! STFU!!!!! Eligius 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 32 appearances and how many starts... 10 in the EPL.Dude, why don't u ask me how many starts willian had this season???LOLOLOLOL.also how many did mata and kdb in half a season. :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eligius 121 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 BOTH OF YOU! STFU!!!!!ok i'll stop...Now I understand why people stop arguing with this tool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 Name-calling. First sign of submission. Ohhhh I am enjoying this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eligius 121 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 Name-calling. First sign of submission. Ohhhh I am enjoying this.its ok.I'll be your friend! I'll spell check for you as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 its ok.I'll be your friend! I'll spell check for you as well.Ohhh... thanks dude.Me tooI ll help u with football discussions for doing me that favor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eligius 121 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 Dude, why don't u ask me how many starts willian had this season???LOLOLOLOL.also how many did mata and kdb in half a season. :lol:Mata had 11 and KDB had 1 or 2 i think....Also, I wasn't debating whether signing both of them were wrong ( that a whole different discussion). I was debating that you think we didn't sell ft9 because of FFP and used the signings of both Willian and Schurrle as an example on how complete bs your so called financial statements were... Hey, I heard Remy doesnt have a release clause or a relegation clause in his contract.. NOT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 Mata had 11 and KDB had 1 or 2 i think....Also, I wasn't debating whether signing both of them were wrong ( that a whole different discussion). I was debating that you think we didn't sell ft9 because of FFP and used the signings of both Willian and Schurrle as an example on how complete bs your so called financial statements were... Hey, I heard Remy doesnt have a release clause or a relegation clause in his contract.. NOTOh again!!!! Ummm... not in the mood to spoon feed u everythinf.Remy has a release clause. Great. Cos THAT is the thing every football fan wants to know, right? I mean loic remy is THE footballer of the generation of whom every detail is explicitly known to every football fan. NOT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eligius 121 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 Oh again!!!! Ummm... not in the mood to spoon feed u everythinf.Remy has a release clause. Great. Cos THAT is the thing every football fan wants to know, right? I mean loic remy is THE footballer of the generation of whom every detail is explicitly known to every football fan. NOT. Well, this whole thing was based on Remy release clause and how you thought you know the QPR board and Remy. Even though the place to be even said how qpr messed up financially. No the reason he was sent out on loan is because he earns about £70,000 p/w and QPR play in the Championship. Their finances are a mess so they needed to remove at least some of his wages from their bill, as well as getting a fee from Newcastle for the loan.Not true. It's highly likely that even if QPR got promoted these guys would either be loaned out again or sold because QPR are massively in debt. They would probably look to go a more frugal route to achieve survival rather than repeat the mistakes of before.Highly likely. As for Granero he probably could play for Cardiff, but Cardiff couldn't afford him. QPR DOUBLED his wages when he joined them so moving him on is very difficult. Hey, I can make up random numbers too for transfer fees. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 Well, this whole thing was based on Remy release clause and how you thought you know the QPR board and Remy. Even though the place to be even said how qpr messed up financially. Hey, I can make up random numbers too for transfer fees. Is not that what u have been doing? Atleast I can own up and say I was wtong about one thing, remy's release clause.which is better than going on and on about FFP when u have no clue about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eligius 121 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 Is not that what u have been doing? Atleast I can own up and say I was wtong about one thing, remy's release clause.which is better than going on and on about FFP when u have no clue about it. Even though I had a whole discussion with another poster about it and he agree though.....BAck to accounting 101 you go! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 Even though I had a whole discussion with another poster about it and he agree though.....BAck to accounting 101 you go! Sadly, our board and jose don't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiwaz 539 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 I thought this was the Lukaku thread, boy was I wrong! At least I'm getting some accounting lessons, so I got that going for me . PANDOOBIE, Eligius, Reddish-Blue and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bir_CFC 3,455 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 What's funny is that you guys are just arguing about the most random things haha. Going off random tangents every 2 posts haha.It started with Torres, you were both right since Elgius was looking at the impact to Chelsea's financial outlook in the FUTURE while didierforever was focused on the FFP impact whenever he was sold. It was a misunderstanding clearly because both things aren't even related.The rest of the discussion is beyond me haha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 What the actual fuck?! Do I even need to say it: Get back on topic, please! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 That actually hurt my eyes. BlueLion., Reddish-Blue and Blue-in-me-Veins 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted March 29, 2014 Share Posted March 29, 2014 What's funny is that you guys are just arguing about the most random things haha. Going off random tangents every 2 posts haha.It started with Torres, you were both right since Elgius was looking at the impact to Chelsea's financial outlook in the FUTURE while didierforever was focused on the FFP impact whenever he was sold. It was a misunderstanding clearly because both things aren't even related.The rest of the discussion is beyond me haha.I found it easy to deal with ,,just scrolled straight past all the FFP crap Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.