Eligius

I can see Mourinho going 4-3-3. WIth Luiz-ramires-lampard Willian-eto-hazard Does anyone know the extent of Luiz's injury?

Don't know what game you were watching.... Oscar was playing behind Lampard and than slide back to CM and than play through the wings a lot... Oscar provided the best passes for us to score today besides the cross from Dave. Hazard had the best opportunity to score this game. In addition, Hazard gave the ball away how many times today?

Joe Hart saved from embarrassment.

we lost because our fullbacks were getting abused....

Cahill was quite lucky today not to concede penalties and more freekicks.

Mourinho needs to play either Willian or Ramires each game (maybe Oscar). The amount of grass they cover is crucial to our defense.

Oscar set pieces have improved (not so much corners). He had a decent game today. Put Hazard on goal (not sure if it was pass or blocked shot) and whipped some good crosses in.

Pairing him up with Oscar for a good duration of the match when we were getting outmatched psychically. Playing 4-3-3 in the start of the game and not playing Willian to cover for Ramires's trackback ability.

It was always City's to lose.... I would be glad with 2nd place and semifinals in UCL.... Next season is when Mourinho's Chelsea will take shape.

Matic was pretty bad today... However, I blame Mourinho for his form and personnel choice.

We wouldn't because someone would of provided help ala Ramires, rather than have championship level players abuse our fullbacks all day long.

The team 's head was in paris...

We sure didn't need Ramires this game....... Fans don't understand his significance to the team.

We deserve to lose more than 0-1.... Great result leading to PSG.

Always need to be a scapegoat...... When the team was horrible

This is why you don't play Oscar as cm.

Even though I had a whole discussion with another poster about it and he agree though..... BAck to accounting 101 you go!

Well, this whole thing was based on Remy release clause and how you thought you know the QPR board and Remy. Even though the place to be even said how qpr messed up financially. No the reason he was sent out on loan is because he earns about £70,000 p/w and QPR play in the Championship. Their finances are a mess so they needed to remove at least some of his wages from their bill, as well as getting a fee from Newcastle for the loan. Not true. It's highly likely that even if QPR got promoted these guys would either be loaned out again or sold because QPR are massively in debt. They would probably look to go a more frugal route to achieve survival rather than repeat the mistakes of before. Highly likely. As for Granero he probably could play for Cardiff, but Cardiff couldn't afford him. QPR DOUBLED his wages when he joined them so moving him on is very difficult. Hey, I can make up random numbers too for transfer fees.

According to the guardian, they have 2 deals already in place this summer... Maybe Coentrao, coleman, baines, or osman.... Hopefully, its not Gundogan, Kroos, shaqiri or Reus.

If Cole indeeds goes to RM, that means its certain Coentrao is leaving to potentially United, which would not be good for us.

Come on. You know he has to have the last word in every discussion

Mata had 11 and KDB had 1 or 2 i think.... Also, I wasn't debating whether signing both of them were wrong ( that a whole different discussion). I was debating that you think we didn't sell ft9 because of FFP and used the signings of both Willian and Schurrle as an example on how complete bs your so called financial statements were... Hey, I heard Remy doesnt have a release clause or a relegation clause in his contract.. NOT

its ok. I'll be your friend! I'll spell check for you as well.

ok i'll stop... Now I understand why people stop arguing with this tool.

32 appearances and how many starts... 10 in the EPL. Funny how you think we needed to spend an additional amount for ams when we needed to strengthen CF, CM and the backline more. Jose's teams are sure built from ams, not cms or cbs or cfs.. YEAP! I like you though because you make me laugh.