Fernando

But there's a problem I have, and I'm skeptical of UN, they are so biased I have a problem with this: Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruciton of a racial. How can it be deliberate when they are their because of Hamas? If anything it would be hamas that is doing genocide as they provoke this and don't nothing to stop as they don't care for their people. If Gaza are startving then how come Hamas is still kicing on about? So I have a problem with that part of deliberate. The other parts of the definition of genocide are true, Israel is doing that. I don't deny that. The blockade, bombing and all that stuff is true. BUT the definition of genocide is also adding "with the intent to eliminate the groups existence". I don't see that intent when they are their because of Hamas and Hamas still fighting. I will agree with this definition if say Hamas surrender, gives back all the hostage and then Israel continues attacking for no good reason. Then I will say 100 percent genocide.

Thanks for the video. Yes he is asking some questions that to me needs to be address when this is all over. And those should be address when this all over, because no war is eternal. I would think the own Israelites will do a thorought investigation into this and if this is true he would be jailed. Which in all fact I think a lot of people in their should be jailed. They are not committing genocide but more like war crime and officers and what not should go to jail once this is all over.

In one thing where i was debating with vesper is that often times when you read an article it will be highly bias. They tend to take one word or phrase to build their entire teaching. For example I been doing some more further research on what Kirk believe in Immigration just by listening to his word, in context, with no cuts and all that nonsenese that Journos and people do. And it came out a very thought out process. From 14:03 to 24:40 he gives a detail response as to his view on immigration. And I have to say my man gives a thoughtful view. I still don't agree with his point of view with immigration but this is much smarter then labels he got thrown as xenophobic and what not. That's why I tend to be very skeptical with articles and what not as they tend to have a bias and choose and pick what they want.

This whole Strasbourg not going to end well me thinks. Fans in france are very vocal and passionate. Similar to owning a club in Germany, not going to fare well. I wonder if it would have worked better in Portugal? Or some other league like in Belgium?

Emanuel Emegha’s move to Chelsea provokes fresh fury at Strasbourg The team is climbing up the Ligue 1 table but fans are sick of being treated like ‘pawns’ by the Chelsea owners By Get French Football News Luke Entwistle Mon 15 Sep 2025 11.04 EDT Share Strasbourg are a club torn between inertia and evolution. Change is visible all around the Meinau: in its recently developed stands and on the pitch where, in two years, they have gone from perennial relegation strugglers to Champions League candidates. The motor for change was BlueCo’s purchase of the club in 2023. The takeover was met with stout opposition and the team’s upward trajectory since has done little to remould public opinion. “I feel like we are back at the beginning. I am so disappointed with the reaction,” complained Liam Rosenior on Sunday, exasperated by the latest fan protests. You needn’t scratch too much to uncover the resentment that bubbles beneath the surface of the Meinau. The 15-minute strike, where the club’s ultras remain silent at the start of matches, is now just a common feature of Strasbourg fixtures, and you are never more than a few weeks away from a lengthy and often explosive supporters group communique denouncing some facet of the management of the club. BlueCo have always been the target of the fans’ ire – and that remains the case – but recent protests have also seen other figures caught in the crossfire. Marc Keller, who played for Strasbourg in the 1990s and came to the club’s rescue when it went bankrupt in the early 2010s, is the latest target. He built the club back up from the amateur divisions but fans are furious that he sold up to BlueCo. Strasbourg’s supporters federation called for him to “face his responsibilities” and leave before their match against Le Havre on Sunday. “We will never accept what Marc Keller has done to the club by selling to BlueCo,” read the statement. And what the club has become is acquiescent. What Chelsea want, Chelsea get. Ben Chilwell hardly fits the team’s needs but that is largely irrelevant to BlueCo given their extensive portfolio of players. He needed a new club and interest wasn’t forthcoming, so Chelsea sent him to Strasbourg to join Mathis Amougou and Diego Moreira, who have also made the same move in recent seasons. Chilwell made his debut in the 1-0 win over Le Havre. He was hooked at half-time. View image in fullscreen Ben Chilwell had a forgettable Strasbourg debut. Photograph: Icon Sport/Getty Images Strasbourg fans are unimpressed by BlueCo’s opaque dealings and asset juggling. Ishé Samuels-Smith joined Strasbourg from Chelsea on a permanent deal this summer before returning to Stamford Bridge and then being sent out on loan to Swansea City – all within the same window. “They’re taking us for fools,” read a banner unfurled by the Strasbourg fans in response to the saga. A more disparaging banner was reserved for Emanuel Emegha, who will move to Chelsea next summer. The power dynamics within the BlueCo “family” mean that Chelsea get the pick of the crop. Emegha scored 14 league goals last season and was handed the captain’s armband over the summer, but he is now preparing to move to Stamford Bridge. The announcement of the deal was not well received in Alsace. “Emegha, pawn of BlueCo, after changing shirts, hand back your captain’s armband,” read a banner. Rosenior said that Emegha was “devastated” by the banner. “I don’t know why they want him to leave straight away,” added Moreira. “OK, he has signed for Chelsea, but he is still here.” Emegha’s insistence that he is “100% focused on Strasbourg until the end of the season” has not appeased fans. However, that he remains in France at all this season is a testament to Strasbourg’s newfound exceptionalism. While the financial realities of French football force others to sell, Strasbourg are able to retain their assets and resist even the advances of “top European clubs that play in the Champions League” – as revealed by Emegha himself. View image in fullscreen Strasbourg fans express their fury with Emegha. Photograph: Icon Sport/Getty Images Having brought in 18 players this summer for a combined €110m, making them the top spenders in Ligue 1, above even PSG, Strasbourg are now the envy of French clubs. And yet, despite joining the elite, fans are reminiscent of the times of hardship, of relegation struggles and financial worries. Rosenior pleaded for fans to applaud his players after a hard-fought win against Le Havre; he was met with hostility, boos and jeers. “Please, please,” he shouted, but the Englishman cut the image of a man fighting a hopeless battle. The win, secured through Joaquín Panichelli’s late penalty, takes them up to fifth in Ligue 1 and level on points with third-placed Monaco. Having finished seventh last season, their performances so far this campaign suggest they will be in the race for a Champions League place. It would be quite the achievement but, for many Strasbourg fans, it still won’t be enough. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2025/sep/15/emanuel-emegha-Chelsea-fresh-fury-strasbourg-ligue-1

Yes I did saw a debate about this with him an a femmnist. He did believe in that patriarchy vs the feminist movement. Could be or could not. We will never know unless she spoke about it and if her husband did talk to her about that. At this time just pure speculation. We don't know and have nothing concrete. My speculation is just a general guy that killed him, nothing deep secret conspiracy theory about it. It was a guy that grew up in a conservative life but as he grew up he differed from the views from his family and he got a hatred for Kirk as a fascist pig. Just a normal guy gone crazy with a vendetta for me.

Interesting, the only problem is that Epstein is dead so we couldn't question about this connectiong as a Mossad agent. But if Kirk was aware of that I'm sure his wife would know...... People can always question his now widow wife in the future about this. If she did know something, did his husband mentioned anything about this?

I would like to see more info about this. Because every time I heard Kirk debate he would defend Israel. In one debate I put where he was at Cambridge posted 3 months ago he was defending Israel, here from 52:30 and on:

Yea I agree and that's because for me they are so much in loved with their political affiliation. Because they are republican, they will use that as their "glasses" that will shape their worldview. Now to the person who killed him, he just made him a martyr. This Charlie Kirk guy, my wife and I hardly knew him. I seen him once when he was doing debate but never really followed him. I was actually surprised to see my daughter 12 years old listen to him, because she told me she liked to see them debate, him and his opponents. She enjoyed those debates with opposing views.... But after he died my wife and I have seen him more, lol. That's what happens when you create a martyr. In the end my wife told me he was a bit arrogant in the way he came about with his debates. "Prove me wrong" it's very arrogant and that was his motto it seems.

Many people also said the same about cucurella and Caicedo. So they are not always right. With this guy I'm going to give them the Caicedo treatment. Rather wait next season as he is too raw.

In the end then my opinion is that the legacy the Kirk should be follow is that of debate. Weather I agree with his view point or not people should be able to do that. If we truly live in a free society people should voiced their opinions in a respectful manner and safe environment. As a Christian first I don't agree with all of Kirk views, he used to put his devotion to his political affiliation often time first and when you do that it will influence your ideas. If I had to weight into how much I agree and how much disagree I will say 70-30....it's made up just like that so I'm not sure. I can say what I don't agree with, as I stated before I don't agree that weapons is a god given right (this is core under the maga, right wing ideas). We shouldn't have that kind of power for the reason that according to the bible we are a falling race and people under those conditions can do scary stuff. Sin in the heart of man drives people to do crazy stuff. I can also say I don't like how he attacked immigrants at times, as well the bible speak about this that we should take care of the foreigners and treating them fair. Of course bad people can come in and we need to take care of ourself for that, but we should help people that really want to be here not criminalized them. Those are few things that I heard from him that I don't agree. Might be more if I take more time to listen him carefully. But this is my opinion after taking my time to listen carefully what he has to say, not depend on the opinion of some Journalist that write with a bias and thus might not be honest with the content they have as they will chose and pick what fits their agenda.

This is what I'm talking I want your opinion not someone else opinion. With all these articles you bring me, is their opinion not yours. I want to know why you think like that, why is that your viewpoint not some Journalist. Hence the comment of AI, because that's how it looks like. Now that you voice "your" opinion I can respond. Did Kirk like the vast majority of right wing Christian nationalists distort the corse message of Christ? Maybe but your only focusing on "love" which he did talked, however he also touch many things. I would say first we need to define love by the bible standard if you want to bring Christ in the picture. Do you accept the love definition of the bible? or you make up your own definition? In regard to his ilk are all about domination and power, maybe but I need to know what they are actually teaching. I want a full teaching of his in context not soundbites here and there that can take any word someone says out of context. And all about eradicating anything they deem to not fit into their worldview? It could be but how is this? In what way are they eradicating? By eliminating free speech? By committing violent crime against other? Forceully submitting people into their views? Or just debating with others their point of view?

In which you don't bother going deep into context why he said that. You just take their word and that's it. It's superficial to me. In one of the link they just took one part of a long talk he had here: https://www.mediamatters.org/charlie-kirk/charlie-kirk-goes-unhinged-racist-rant-prowling-blacks-go-around-fun-go-target-white

But that is the point you search what others write. Have you taken the time to listen in context and without cuts? As you know how the journalist do with Chelsea that take things out of context and don't post the full information.

Wait what are you thinking I'm saying? I'm not saying that info is false. I said well if he said that then made a lot of enemy's. That I wasn't aware of what everything he said because I'm not an AI. I only watch a couple YouTube videos in which he debated. In which I posted one. And as well that info you got it is not because you heard his video, took the time to hear what he said but you asked AI and gave you the article. That is what I'm saying. I'm not saying that AI info is fake. So I'm saying I only seen a couple of videos of him just debating on Campusus with college kids. All that other stuff I was not aware of. You need an AI to cycle all that stuff for you so that your are aware otherwise I can't know.

And yes I don't argue with the truth. If he said that then yes he got a lot of enemy. As well I don't agree with everything he says But I do give him props is how he went and debated his viewpoint. I like that and that is the legacy we should continue. And with AI that looks like a AI generated article but if not then good work on them.

Because they need to reduce gun control in which they are not in favor. (When I mean they I mean the people who believe the right to have guns) Like I said in the past why I don't agree. Not because I'm Republicans but because I'm a Christian first. Republicans view are not perfect and whatever does not align with my world view of the Bible I will say it right out. Not a blind Maga follower, or blind republican party follower. So yes they will play dumb because it doesn't do justice to their gun control. Now I'm a favor of the gun control but that doesn't mean we will get rid of these violent crime once and for fall. It will reduce a lot but it's not completely gone because we can smuggle gun from another part of the world.

Seems like Guardian uses AI. Anyhow So if those quotes are true then obviously he made enemy but the point that I like is that he takes time to debate at school different point of view. That is the legacy that I see that people should continue.

On debate On gender, feminism and reproductive rights On gun violence On immigration On Islam On religion Wow I wasn't aware of that I only saw videos where he would debate. For example this one: By the way I'm not AI where I follow everything, I only seen a video or two where he debates in school. All that info you got is not from you but what AI spit you out. So if those quotes are true then obviously he made enemy but the point that I like is that he takes time to debate at school different point of view. That is the legacy that I see that people should continue.

And idiots that is not the legacy that he would want. I'm sure he would want more people like him to continue doing the same job he did. As he often debated against the liberal, woke view and all that stuff in campuses. Weather we get killed oh well but your standing up for your beliefs, and from what I seen from him he was for a lot of Christian belief. The one I did not agree with him was for guns because that is not in the Bible. If anything Jesus recommends the opposite of weapon, peace and humility. The authority in place are the only that should have that power not common people.

Yes I saw him played against Argentina and was tearing them apart. Not long before a PL team come for him. Maybe Brighton.

Won't give a number but let's just say enough to pay the balance for my wife NX and put a down payment for my TX. If you want dividends I recommend buying the ETF DIA. This ETF tracks the Dow Jones and it pays a monthly dividen. Good to buy Dow Jones on market crash.

Tesla at 395. What a great recovery. As I been saying the world tends to get it wrong in the market. You need to play contrary to what the world fears in the stock market. The whole fear of Trump and the fascist Musk was a golden opportunity to buy. Remember that next time you see market crashing.

I don't know if it's been mentioned but Ecuador has like a golden generation. I don't remember players from Ecuador being good in Europe like this. Kind of like what happen with Belgium with their gold generation. Granted that Belgium generation was amazing with Hazard and company, but it's interesting to see this boom in Ecuador, something never seen before for that country.

That's as about conspiracy theories as the UFO.