Heisenberg

He is, If an Alexis Sanchez is scoring for fun with an average Arsenal, Leo will score three per match with an exceptionnal Chelsea, he can fit in every top team, however, he may be more effective in some teams then others.

Are you guys doubting Messi's ability to play with Chelsea ? He is the greatest player you'll ever see.

I've read that elsewhere.

ALL HAIL THE KING.

Shalke 05.

Hazard, he will join his friend Demba and they'll both drink shrewsbury syrup.

The only Liverpool legend I'd like to have him in my side, he is the pure attacker.And he likes sniffing the pitch.

And Lampard.People tend to forget that he was never the same since his injury in the beggining of the 2010/2011 season.

My mistake, forgot it was the 10-11 season.

Glad he didnt play in 5-0 El Clasico thrashing, Barca probably played their greatest game in history that day, so Cesc's standards are still matchable, dont think we'll hear that from any Barca players that played in the 11-12 season.

I agree.I should probably have said that this side is potentially the greatest PL side of the history, wait & see.AND ENJOY.

I'm I the only one who thinks this Chelsea side is the best Premier League team in the history ? Those guys are making history.

It will end up a draw and that's perfect for us.

Actually, even the 2010 side wasnt as good as this one, especially in November.The 05 side wasnt like that either, less enjoyable to watch, more clinical.

Strange times this month, an away win to Liverpool, then this ...

Footballistic orgasm.

Fabregas doesnt agree.And since when its only Mourinho who sign players ?

The Mourinho factor will benefit us, he'll sign for us if José wants him.

Cech - Ivanovic - Desailly - Terry - Cole - Makelele - Wise - Lampard - Zola - Drogba - Osgood Mourinho as a manager, Di Matteo as his assistant.

I believe Reus hair are outstanding quality, therefore, we should sign him.

Mourinho needs a World Cup to be considered as the best ever, he'll probably manage Portugal one day, I just hope the crop of players will worth the management.

With Porto he won a Champions League, but failed to win us the trophy in three occasions, and with Inter, I counted six years for Mourinho and six years for Guardiola because Guardiola managed six years. You can be honest, you are still not right.

I got your point, that's why I strictly wanted to explain how he made Barcelona favourites against big opposition as an exceptionnal achievement, and didnt wanted to talk about it on a general note. My first opinion was that Pep is having a better career than Mourinho, it seems its is not the subject anymore, we are more going in a Pep vs Mou direction, that will ultimately ends up with two sides, pro-José and pro-Guardiola, but that wasnt my intentions in first place.

Just picked, simple, normalization isnt my cup of tea, and I dont accept easily such things, it isnt easy to just pick.Mourinho had a great Madrid side too, but didnt win trophies, football defies logic.

" Guardiola' s team in all games with the exception of perhaps the European giants away are always the strong favourites" I dont agree, he made Barcelona looks the favourite because of the dominace they produced with his football, its a gained-status, not a given one, and even before him, Barcelona is Barcelona, they'll always be the favourite against smaller teams, its against the biggest of teams that we have noticed how much Barca looked invincible under Pep, and that's what should reflect the quality of the group and the manager.I definetly agree on the point of Mourinho is a galvanisator and an amazing coach for groups of players that never won titles, and no one will repeat what he did at Porto, but again, why should we blast Pep if he only had offers from Barcelona A as they watched his capacities with Barca B ? If he had the chance to go to another team, maybe he'd have done great elsewhere, we cannot know. " Imagine if Di Matteo had set up like for like in the Nou Camp in 2012, Chelsea would have lost badly " Why should I even imagine this ? We have to be rational in our way of thinking and by saying that it implies that Pep is a dogmatic managers when approching games, if he was our manager in 2012 with that team he'd have played in a defensive way anyway ! Good managers make good sides, there is no such thing of a side making a manager, and Pep made Barcelona, not the contrary.He got rid of players at the right time where we didnt.Di Matteo, with a little bit of luck, made of a small Chelsea team a big Chelsea team, and that's an amazing achievement.