Spike

Jesus Christ, he isn't even online. That wasn't the basis of his argument, the basis was that he has seen a lot of games (which for some reason you don't believe him). That 'he doesn't play for Chelsea' was only a facet of his argument; literally a half sentence.

I just said this Just because an idea hasn't been mentioned doesn't mean it is automatically false.

1. Streams 2. You don't know if BlueLion has a friend that is from Nantes. You don't know that they don't regularly watch games together. 3. You don't know that BlueLion doesn't spend a lot of time in France or another place where they are televised. 4. You don't know that BlueLion doesn't have a subscription to a Ligue 1 chanel deal that he watches through a VPN. 5. BlueLion may not watch Nantes in particular, he may watch games like Marseille, Lyon and PSG when they play Nantes. You assume that BlueLion can only watch Nantes on TV. You assume he has no other means of watching Nantes.You quite simply don't know how or why BlueLion watches Nantes, you only assume. Just because an idea hasn't been mentioned doesn't mean it is automatically false. You have no proof, only assumptions that you've made based on incomplete information. Djiilobodju also plays for Senegal and has done so in the AFCON. If I know BlueLion he was also watched this man perform for his country, but I don't know that, it is only an assumption like what you have done. Let's say I have a box, it was given to me by a man. The man states 'Boxes can be opened by keys'. Now, he hasn't stated that this box is opened by a key, only that boxes can be opened by keys. Now, why would I immediately try to open the box with a key? I don't know that the box is opened by a key, all I know is that this is a box and I've been told boxes can be opened by keys. To immediately attempt to open the box with a key would be an assumption based on incomplete information given to me by another entity. This is what you are doing.

That isn't proof, that is an assumption made on conjecture.

I wouldn't. I'd change style first.

The three players you listed are notorious for being hot and cold.

That isn't the point. The point being I don't criticise or rate something that I haven't seen, used or know anything about. Until then it is just an assumption based on conjecture. For instance, I bought The Witcher, when it was released back in 2008. I didn't know if I'd like it but I didn't have an opinion on it till I played it. I bought the game based on what I knew about it; being it's a point-and-click RPG. I didn't know if I'd like it or not, that is impossible. Criticizing and reviewing a game without first hand experience is comparable to most forms of media, books, TV, film and even the ability of footballers

Nah, it'll be more like a 4-4-2, fam. Which is just a modified, 4-2-3-1, which I just a modified 4-3-3, which is just a modified 4-1-2-3, which is just a modified, 4-1-4-1, which is just a modified 4-2-1-3. Damn, formations are a little asinine. It's like the tactics and strategies employed are more important than a formation.

It's like having an opinion on a videogame you've never played.

S H O G U N You mopped hair cunt.

Name: Blue Traveler Reason: Abusive Behaviour Punishment: Content moderated for 7 daysAbility to create content removed for 7 days.Suspended for 7 days

Penalties...I hate them. It is just like losing scissors, paper, rock.

I unlocked it because Jason is SHIT FOR BRAINS.

featuring Will.I.A.N

I could see him in a De La Soul video.

Remy looks like he should be rapping about Afrocentricity in early 90s New York.

RAMIRES YOU ARE THE BANE OF MY EXISTENCE YOU ARE MY ANELKALOUDA

And then the rest of the season.

Stoke are bring an amazing atmosphere. Same for the travelling fans.

Farking geez, Stoke have a good team.

As a midfield duo? No thanks.

Ramires and Mikel?

Fair is fair is when you suck back.

It is nearly 2:25am. I'm in America.

Whatever, I've been drinking. I typed the wrong number out. You are right.