Spike

We Hate Scouse

Lo siento, no es accetable pero te amo.

You'll always have my belief, even if you don't always have me. Never forget Paris.

The only dimension of De Heer Robben's approach to football.

Mario Götze. We Hate Scouse Even though he barely deserves it.

Messi makes Barcelona Barcelona not those two. They are brilliant players no doubt, probably two of the best in the world, but Messi takes Barcelona to the next level, not those two. Barcelona can handle life without Iniesta and Xavi but not without Messi.

My mother kicked me out of home several times when I was in highschool. Just saying. I can sympathise with the guy. All I've got to say. Shut the fuuuuuck uuuuup, both of you. You are making a scene, have a look at yourselves. Ooops, looks like I lied. I've two things to say.

B-but I already posted that link. Regardless, it's nice to see this is official. No more speculation or worrying and certainly no more meltdowns naming José a traitor among other distasteful words.

We are 10 hours in front of the UK. When it's June 3rd 12:00am in the UK iti'll be June 3rd 10:00am here. When it's June 4th 12:00am here it'll be June 3rd 2:00pm in the UK.

http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/news/news/2013-14/jun/jose-mourinho-returns-to-chelsea.html?

Unless the Official Premier League website gaffed up awfully, the wait is over. It's done, The Special One has returned.

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/soccer-dirty-tackle/premier-league-website-posts-jose-mourinho-chelsea-announcement-032514778.html http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/news/news/2013-14/jun/jose-mourinho-returns-to-chelsea.html?

Well it's true. From my understanding he wasn't banned from a single gaff but a multitude of gaffs. There is only so much a person can get away with, I think he went through a period of often warnings a while ago which eventually screwed him in the long run. But in the end what is done, is done.

The last I heard he had the maximum amount of warnings a user can have, one more transgression and banning is the only punishment. The rules, are the rules, are the rules.

Maybe...don't feel like I've much to say anymore.

Just because I like you, I'll kill you last.

You are. I'm banting with him. FFS is a good lad, he just doesn't like you. Which is fair because you are a cunt.

Hmm, interesting point Strike. The club must have this in consideration when buying new players this transfer window. Do you actually believe that Rooney and Shaw could join?

The Internet is serious business [sic] making everyone on the Internet a tough guy, a self-proclaimed badboy with nothing to lose. Behind the LED lights of a monitor everyone is a thick-skinned dynamo that can hurl out insults and take them with the best of the best. And it’s fucking annoying. You there! Reading this. When was the last time you insulted someone on the internet? Called them a ‘ knob goblin’ or a ‘fucker faced retard drop kick’? It was probably in the last 24 hours right? Right. Now think of the last time you said the same words to a person on the street or at a pub? What happened? I’m putting my money on two scenarios, you either: got into some deep shit (people yelling at you/arrested) or you left with your tail between your legs with a new black eye to compliment the usual non black eye. So why are you cunt on the Internet, if you are such a lovely human being in the flesh? I’m a cunt in real life, so that’s my excuse, but I at least know when to leave something alone and when to shut my damn mouth. When I see something on the internet, that I don’t agree with (or isn’t factually right), it’s not my prerogative to march in chest out, get offended and try to sway their opinion in a flurry of insults and rage. The same applies for you, have some decency and tact. Don’t fall for traps, don’t take the bait and don’t get angry. I lost my temper the other day on TalkChelsea for some misunderstanding and cultural difference (or some bullshit like that). I thought about what I was doing, realised I looked like a frothing twat and I left it alone. I left the site alone for a few days and now everything has reset and the tiny incident (if it can be called that) is forgotten. If you disagree and have to respond to defend you honour and intelligence, there is no need to attack the other person. Just state your opinion and leave it at that, no need to call them a ‘cock jockey’, somewhere during your thesis. But that’s the easy stuff, what I find even more enraging and frustrating is passive-aggressive behaviour. I’m guilty of it myself and I hate myself for it. Saying things like “LOL That’s your opinion? Okay” or “DEAL WITH IT. It’s snide, arrogant and completely dick like in nature. People take it to the next level by using emotiocons/smileys. Just by throwing in :banghead: they take the douchebaggery and the cuntiness up to 11. If you think that using a smiley or whatever to mask an insult is a great idea, then I hate you. Personally, I’m staying away from the masses from now on. I’ve a lot of free time for a while and I’m going to just write up articles when I feel like it, writing is my passion and I'm embracing it. Don't expect me to post too often anymore, okay? This how I’m dealing with the Internet Hate Machine, I suggest you figure out how you are going to deal with it yourself. All the insults and passive-aggressive nonsense just make everyone look like a bunch of COD playing 12 year-olds who have just learnt a bunch of new swears. Chill out and grow up. But that’s my opinion and you can do whatever you like. The average internet user is akin to a soldier carrying their keyboards as guns, spraying their hate left right and centre. I’m aware of the hypocrisy and irony so don’t fucking mention it. Yes, yes, everything I’ve just is applicable to this post. I know.

It's not about statistics at all. The stats are just there as a supporting act, I could have written the article sans statistics. I was just creating a case for the #9 shirt being a very unlucky shirt (if you believe in that sort of stuff).

Well, you know...I made this thread. So yeah, you must not have read the OP.

Lionel Messi was your childhood hero? How old are you? 14?

Since it almost took eight hours for a staff member to verify, my article has been lost in the mix: BUMP. You shouldn't really mind this post, it's an illusion.

As and English club, FA law requires a certain amount of English players to be registered in the squad every season. Its easy to bypass this rule and register youth players that the club will never play but it is nice to have a little legitimacy and have a core of regular starting English players. Not being an Englishmen myself, it doesnt bother me all that much where the players in the starting XI are from, but Im not the law maker and as I said the FA demands it. Right now the main Pommies featuring regularly in the Chelsea squad are John Terry, Ashley Cole, Frank Lampard and Gary Cahill. Not a bad list of players, eh? All capped by England, and three of four have Captained England. But, Terry, Cole and Lamps are getting old, all on the very wrong side of 30 and Cahill; well its debateable if he is even qualified to be the undisputed #1 CB at Chelsea. Soon, whether its next season where you can find good betting odds with Unibet or the seasons after Terry, Cole and Lamps will leave or retire. Its going to happen, accept it. Who is going to replace this trio? Someone bought? Or someone promoted? Now when it comes to English players, they seem to be potted into very distinct groups: Idiots That Are In The Media Daily (John Terry, Wayne Rooney, Ashley Cole Rio Ferdinand, Joey Barton) and Quiet Respectable Men With A Stiff Upper Lip (Frank Lampard, Leighton Baines, Paul Scholes, Phil Jagielka). Which do I prefer: The type of guy that gets into the news for snorting cocaine from a prostitutes stomach, or the bloke that is in the news for scoring a hat trick against Liverpool? While they are both great and entertaining in their own rights, I think I lean towards the bloke who scores on the football pitch and not the fella that scores in the brothel. At the Chelsea youth theyve some very interesting prospects. Very interesting. It seems the youth setup is finally paying dividends on talented youngsters, but as Chelsea fans we say that every few years dont we? Starting the list of is Islam Feruz, a Scottish youngster signed from Celtic, a forward in the mould of Wayne Rooney. Ruben Loftus-Cheek a pornstar a young physical Englishmen that is earning more money a year than Ill ever see in a lifetime, a combative midfielder, though with injury problems. Nathanial Chalobah, the beast, the animal, dominant in Zolas Watford; Chalobah has drawn comparisons from dozens of players, for instance he is compared to that cunt Yay Touré. Todd Kane, another Englishmen; has been doing a marvellous effort at Blackburn Rovers, tearing up and down the right flank as a RB. And lastly, the prodigal son himself, Josh McEachran; Josh has talent and technique above nearly all of these other youngsters, yet he lack drive and determination, he seems to have rested on his laurels after picking himself up a pretty(?) girlfriend. Very exciting stuff indeed A Scot and four Englishmen; five big prospects, five lads set for stardom or bust. Sadly we are maybe seeing one bust right now. McEachrans hype and justification for playing for Chelsea seems to growing weaker by the match. A superb technique not seem in the English game is possessed by Joshs left foot but as I said earlier he is cursed with a very slim physique and a mentality more geared towards listened to Morrissey and The Smiths while writing in his diary. He can still do it, he can still make, to give up on him just yet, is chomping at the bit. Give just a little hope, because he is only 20 and José hasnt arrived nor has he decided on Josh. Ruben Loftus-Cheek and Nathanial Chalobah are in my eyes shoe-ins for the Chelsea first team one day. Powerful, determined and technical; all three adjective are applicable to both players. They are rather similar players really; maybe Loftus-Cheek has more up his sleeve in terms of attacking but Chalobah offers more in defence. But other than that, the similarities are there and hopefully the similarities dont push one forward whilst holding the other back. They'll make it one day, trust me. I'm calling this right now. Laugh at me later if you want, but I'm still calling it. I havent seen much of Islam Feruz to be honest. Ive heard whispers and rumours that he is a powerful forward that will run his socks off for the good of the team; much like Wayne Rooney and Carlos Tevéz. The is great, Im taking a lot of liberty here but Im going to say that makes him as versatile as Rooney and Tevéz. In general I believe its harder for forwards to break into the first team. They talent and the goods are all there but if they dont score its bye-bye time. A few games and a few missed chances could ruin Islams future at Chelsea. But a few early goals could see his stock and hype soar and rise beyond everything reasonable. Tricky ones to call forwards are. But now, who can Chelsea buy? The rags are linking the Blues to players such as Wayne Rooney, Luke Shaw andthats pretty much it. Two very, very great players, I might add. Id take them in a heartbeat. But how much will they cost? Who will they be marginalising at Chelsea? Will they flop? I feel Luke Shaw is a must buy. Not even a second thought or opinion about it, future number one LB for England. No doubt about it. He is already better than Bertrand and he is quickly coming up on Ashley Cole. He is tall, strong, quick and can run all day and night. A self-claimed Chelsea supporter, Shaw is an absolute must buy, I cannot stress this enough. If Shaw is missed out on and he joins ManUtd Liverpool or some other team, I will be very cross and upset. Rooney. He has been brilliant at ManUtd ever since his debut. Can he brilliant for Chelsea too? Wayne dislike Moyes and Moyes dislike Wayne. So that being said Shrek Rooney will probably want to leave ManUtd. But who will he join? PSG? Arsenal? My bet is Chelsea. Im not too sure I want him at Chelsea, but I cant say I wouldnt want him here either. He is dynamic; he can play in just about every position with class and elegance (something he lacks in real life). He would definitely improve Chelsea, as he would be a perfect CF. People say he cant play as a CF anymore after being converted to CAM/CM but I respond to that with: If he can be converted to a CAM/CM from a striker, the reverse is more than possible. Its not like he can only switch positions once, besides he has played as a CF much longer than he has played in this deeper position. He will cost an arm and a leg, but I cant complain much about that seeing as it wont be my arm or leg. So what you would you prefer? Buying in all the English and homegrown talent or focusing inwards on the youth system? I think the pickings are bare enough in both fields which enables a little of both. Buying Shaw would be great, but so would promoting Loftus-Cheek and Chalobah. You probably disagree, if so why?3 1At the very least they have to be homegrown. In fact Im too sure about the rules. Victor Moses is homegrown, but he plays for Nigeria (though Im sure he owns an English passport). I know Owen Hargreaves was English to a degree but did he qualify as homegrown growing up in Canada and playing his early career in Germany? I think when it comes down to it a player can be homegrown and non-eligible for the Three Lions and they can be eligible for the Three Lions without being homegrown. Confusing. 2 I think a lot of Poms and just about everyone else arent bothered too much by it either. 3 You are probably wrong anyway. Click here to view the article

No read it again. In a single season he has the highest amount of goals across all competition (22 goals) and the lowest in the league (1 goal). The highest for the league belongs to Hernán with only 10 goals. But don’t worry it gets better…than much worse…