Jump to content

Sheva.

Member
  • Posts

    9,846
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3
  • Country

    United States

Everything posted by Sheva.

  1. He's the only one who tries to make things happen, essentially doing Lampard's job.
  2. Yep, it's all Mata's fault that Torres isn't in the game and Lampard can't make a pass. We should send him to Swansea now.
  3. Because Mata played well in his last start, and Schurrle has been sub-par since his hat-trick for Germany. If anything, the only person who could have started instead of Mata is Willian.
  4. Mata had to start, and Mourinho won't drop Oscar, hence Mazacar again.
  5. Right you are On Willian you're right he can do better in attack, but there are many factors that might be the cause of this that have been posted. But in the mean time he's not just slouching around, but working very hard and has been involved in goals when he has played, so i'm fairly happy with him.
  6. I watched them against Liverpool, and i'm sure there will be space for us to exploit. We have to be compact at the back because they do have some good players in attack, but if Torres and Hazard are on their game we will get chances, just have to put them away.
  7. He's done his fair share getting goals, actually more than his fair share because he made up for Lamps and our strikers not scoring. But he's also a CAM, and meant to be our primary playmaker, yet he has 0 assists in the league. And it's not like he has created abundance of chances for people to miss either. Only time we look good in attack is when we counter or Torres takes matters into his hands and dribbles his way through. Everyone can do better, but mainly Oscar since it's his job to dictate our play. Anyway, my original point wasn't even about Oscar and Mata but you turned it into that. Having Mata around is good for us because he's a player with tremendous quality in attack. He doesn't have to start every game, but he can still play a major part for us.
  8. People brought up fair points to counter your criticism of Willian so:
  9. Attack could really be any different combination. Only Torres looks like a definite starter.
  10. He has done well but we are 2nd because of our defensive workrate imo, because our attack has hardly been brilliant so far.
  11. Obvious you're not a Chelsea fan, but Mourinho specifically told players to limit crossing because we have only 1 person in the box. So crossing definitely does not help KDB's cause. And your last line is just fanboyish bitterness.
  12. Our other attacking mids are not great enough for us to sell Mata, they are all good but Mata is still the best and most effective of the lot in attacking positions.
  13. Drogba killing shit in the Turkish league and he's still been a handful every-time in the CL also.
  14. Lol no. Hazard has played well since the Norwich game, only exception was vs City. He will always start if he's fit, Schurrle and Willian are fighting to play on the opposite wing.
  15. He has had good moments like these every season for us, except his first half season. But something happens and he stops trying again. I do hope this lasts more than the others, because we look so much better in attack when he's hungry and skinning defenders.
  16. Willian will soon take Schurrle's spot.
  17. Overall he played a good game. City didn't have many clear chances, and when they did it was due to individual brilliance of their very good players.
  18. City hardly had a shot before 42 minutes, Chelsea should have been 3-0 up by the time they started playing. Honestly anything other than 3 points would have been 2 points dropped considering how the game was going, thankfully Hart came to the rescue.
  19. Can't expect players who started against City to play again after 1 day rest.
×
×
  • Create New...