didierforever

HOW DOES LOANING HIM TO WBA HELP HIM? HIS LAST MATCH WITH WBA WAS MANCHESTER UNITED IN WHICH HE SCORED A HAT-TRICK. YET AGAINST UNITED, HE DINT GET A MINUTE TO PLAY? HIS 17 GOALS FOR WBA ARE THROWN ASIDE IF EVER MENTIONED, SAYING THAT "IT WAS JUST WBA, WHO CARES, HE DINT SCORE FOR US". THIS IS A USELESS LOAN WHICH DOES NOTHING FOR HIM BECOMING A CHELSEA PLAYER. IRRESPECTIVE OF HOW MANY GOALS HE SCORES, HE IS GOING TO HAVE TO START FROM GROUND 0 AGAIN, NEXT SEASON. USELESS.

3 more years for torres.

u can check the timings and see who started it.

torres is going no where. (we expect him to get out of here before every season but one pathetic performance after another he still stays). etoo might or might not be here. ba should not be here even as we speak. plus i feel next year we WILL get rooney or a real big name striker. hence again the 3rd striker position for the lad. i feel it would have been better if he could have stayed here, fought for his place in the team (because if lukaku is given a true chance, he WILL prove that he is better than torres), it would have been better.

lukaku>torres. whole world agrees. another torres fan girl.

the problem will be the same next year. even if lukaku scores 15+ goals for wba ,again, this season, people will just come out and say, wba and chelsea play very differently, he is still not ready, blah blah blah. if he had stayed here, got carling cup matches, fa cup matches, atleast 2 CL matches plus a odd PL match here or there. he still could have got 10+ appearance for us, plus he would have atleast got an official goal for CFC.

take 2.

under 21s then.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzjelVtrXqg amazing reaction...

troy?

everton played like the old chelsea. right now, baines and peinaar and coleman are just crossing the ball into the box. on the other hand we stopped crossing the ball a year ago. anyways, no one is comparing lukaku to etoo here (even the aging one).

what?? what sums what up? by the way in all the hogwash, this guy was simply left un noticed.

he is 20 for god's sake. do u expect kalas/ake to beat jagielka and distin? plus he goes to a team like everton where he will take some time adjusting to their style of play and all. WBA is a much better option.

even before signing etoo, we had made it clear that we wanted rooney (cavani or any other striker). we were always going to have the same problem of rooney (etoo), being no.1, yet lukaku was promised game time and all. and suddenly we want to loan him!!! what has changed in a day?

everton dont care about lukaku's promise and potential. jelavic is a decent striker and with kone too in everton, lukaku wont get much playing time. WBA (if the stories are true), is a much better option.

oh come on!!! this is far more interesting than the deadline day itself. nothing is happening right now. it seems all the teams are taking their dinner. plus its far more entertaining.

oh come on!!! this is far more interesting than the deadline day itself. nothing is happening right now. it seems all the teams are taking their dinner. plus its far more entertaining.

ahead of jelavic? doubt it.

got it, ... stingray, i got a message for u.

ma'am, i dont think i am the person who u should be quoting.. i have nothing to do with it. just a casual by-stander enjoying a nice show with some popcorn...

damn fuck... i removed him from my FPL team just last week. damn... i ll probably have to use my wildcard... too many changes...

stingray taking on bushman and barbara alone... wooohhhooo... interesting match-up...

wba just sold odemwingie and long... they will be quite desperate i think.

the last time i heard they were "close" was when i was watching valencia vs barca, at the same time yesterday.

one word - HYPOCRISY. but a brilliant post. :clap:i agree with every thing u said except for rupert. the guy was a "troll".In Internet slang, a troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), either accidentally or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. no doubt about it. his evidence and claims were very poor and were called out a number of times, after which he would take one off the smallest weak point in your debate and continue on that.